Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 17/960,198

PORTABLE CHOPSTICK AND CHOPSTICK BODY ALIGNING STRUCTURE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 05, 2022
Examiner
LAZO, THOMAS E
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Layana Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1169 granted / 1350 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1372
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1350 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin (TWM347886U) in view of Tran (9,999,309). Lin discloses (claim 1) a portable chopstick, comprising two-piece chopsticks, wherein the two-piece chopsticks comprise: an upper chopstick body 10 having a lower end joint block 42; a lower chopstick body 20 having an opposite upper end joint groove 32; and a chopstick body aligning structure 30,40, which is separated into two parts 30,40 and precisely positioned in the upper chopstick body 10 and the lower chopstick body 20 respectively, wherein, the upper chopstick body 10 and the lower chopstick body 20 are made of different materials; when the lower end joint block 42 of the upper chopstick body 10 is locked with the upper end joint groove 32 of the lower chopstick body 20, the upper chopstick body 10 is aligned with the lower chopstick body 20 through the chopstick body aligning structure 30,40 at their four sides. Lin does not disclose square chopsticks with four sides and that the upper chopstick body and the lower chopstick body are made of different materials. Regarding Claim 9, Lin discloses a portable chopstick, comprising two-piece chopsticks, wherein the two-piece chopsticks comprises: an upper chopstick body 10 having a lower end joint block 42; a lower chopstick body 20 having an opposite upper end joint groove 32; and a chopstick body aligning structure 30,40, which is separated into two parts and precisely positioned in the upper chopstick body 10 and the lower chopstick body 20 respectively, wherein, when the lower end joint block 42 of the upper chopstick body 10 is locked with the upper end joint groove 32 of the lower chopstick body 20, the upper chopstick body 10 is aligned with the lower chopstick body 20 through the chopstick body aligning structure 30,40. Lin does not disclose polygonal chopsticks having multiple side wherein the upper chopstick body and the lower chopstick body is made of different materials Tran teaches for a portable chopstick with an upper chopstick body 12, a lower chopstick body 10, and a chopstick body aligning structure 11, and that the chopsticks are square/polygonal chopsticks with four/multiple sides (Figs. 1 and 2) and that the upper chopstick body 12 and the lower chopstick body 10 are made of different materials for the purposes of providing a lighter chopstick that pivots to keep an eating portion elevated. See Tran Abstract. Since Lin and Tran are both in the same field of endeavor the purpose disclosed by Tran would have been recognized in the pertinent art of Lin. It would have been obvious at a time before the invention was effectively filed to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the portable chopsticks of Lin to be square chopsticks with four sides and that the upper chopstick body and the lower chopstick body are made of different materials for the purposes of providing a lighter chopstick that pivots to keep an eating portion elevated. Claims 2, 3, 10, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin and Tran, as applied to claims 1 and 9 above, and further in view of Hee (KR20180057407). Lin discloses that (claims 2 and 10) the upper chopstick body is fitted with a first part of the chopstick body aligning structure, and a portion of the first part forms the lower end joint block. The patentability of fitting the upper chopstick body with a first part of the chopstick aligning structure does not require the injection molding process. See MPEP 2113 Product By Process claims. Lin does not disclose that the upper chopstick body is made of plastics. Hee teaches for a portable chopstick with an upper chopstick body 200, a lower chopstick body 100, and a chopstick body aligning structure 220 and that (claims 2 and 10) the upper chopstick body 200 is made of plastics for the purposes of improving the gripping force between a food grip portion and a handle portion. Since Lin, Tran, and Hee are all in the same field of endeavor the purpose disclosed by Hee would have been recognized in the pertinent art of Lee. It would have been obvious at a time before the invention was effectively filed to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the portable chopsticks of Lee such that the upper chopstick body is made of plastics for the purposes of improving the gripping force between a food grip portion and a handle portion. Regarding claims 3 and 11, Lin discloses that the first part is extended along the upper chopstick body 10 and comprises a fitting portion 41, a protrusion 43,44 and a screw portion 42; the fitting portion 41 is positioned in the upper chopstick body 10; the protrusion 43,44 is protruded between the fitting portion 41 and the screw portion 42, and a cross-sectional dimension of the protrusion 43,44 matches a cross-sectional dimension of the upper chopstick body 10 (Fig. 1); the screw portion 42 is extended outside the upper chopstick body and has an external thread (Figs. 1 and 3). Claims 4 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin, Tran, and Hee as applied to claims 3 and 11 above. Lin, as modified discloses all of the claimed subject matter except that the first part is a metal piece. The patentability of the first metal part does not require forming through a machining of a computer numerical control (CNC) machine. See MPEP 2113 Product By Process claims. Since the applicant has not disclosed that having the first part being a metal piece solves any stated problem or is for any particular purpose above the fact that it forms the first part of the chopstick body aligning structure and it appears that the first part of Lin would perform equally well as a metal piece as claimed by applicant, it would have been an obvious matter of engineering expedience to further modify first part of Lin to be a metal piece as claimed for the purposes of attaching the upper chopstick body to the lower chopstick body. Prior Art Prior art made of record but not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure for showing other two piece chopsticks with aligning structures. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 and 13-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The improvement comprises (claims 5 and 13) a plastic injection piece of the lower chopstick body is fitted with a second part of the chopstick body aligning structure and (claims 8 and 16) that each of the two parts of the chopstick body aligning structure has an aligning mark; when the upper chopstick body is locked with the lower chopstick body, the two aligning marks are located on a straight line. Claims 17-19 are allowed. The improvement comprises (claim 17) that each of the first part and the second part has an aligning mark; when the two pieces of chopstick body are tightly locked through the engagement groove and the engagement block, the two aligning marks are located on a straight line. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communication from the examiner should be directed to Thomas Lazo whose telephone number is (571) 272-4818. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor Nathaniel Wiehe, can be reached on (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for this Group is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS E LAZO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745 December 3, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590595
WORKING CYLINDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577963
HYDRAULIC CIRCUIT CONTROL DEVICE AND MOLDING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559913
HYDRAULIC PRESSURE RELIEF CONTROL SYSTEM FOR UTILITY VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560217
MODULAR ROTATING SHEAR THICKENING FLUID BASED OBJECT CONTROL MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552340
METHOD FOR DETECTING A SAFE STATE OF A VALVE OF A HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1350 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month