Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/962,356

SAFE BATTERY CHARGING STATION MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHING FACILITATING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 07, 2022
Examiner
MCCLURE, JOSHUA PATRICK
Art Unit
1723
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Yarok Advanced Solutions Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
39 granted / 76 resolved
-13.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
122
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 76 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Withdrawn Specification Objection The amendment(s) to the claim(s) filed December 11th, 2025 is acknowledged and the previous objection is withdrawn. Withdrawn Drawings Objections The amendment(s) to the claim(s) and/or drawings filed December 11th, 2025 is acknowledged and the previous objections are withdrawn. Withdrawn Claim Objections The amendment(s) to the claim(s) filed December 11th, 2025 is acknowledged and the previous objection is withdrawn. Withdrawn Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The amendment(s) to the claim(s) filed December 11th, 2025 is acknowledged and the previous rejections are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xiao et al. (CN209616916 (U) and using Machine Translation as English version), hereinafter Xiao. Regarding claim 1, Xaio discloses a charging station mounted fire extinguishing facilitating apparatus (i.e., at least [0002], [0007]-[0008], [0014], [0016], [0049]-[0053], [0054], Fig. 3), comprising: a plurality of spaced interconnected partitions fixedly mounted at a charging station (i.e., at least as shown in Annotated Fig. 3), and that define an interior volume within which a rechargeable electric battery is introducible and rechargeable (i.e., at least charging compartments ref. 351 as disclosed in [0053] and shown in Annotated Fig. 3, also see [0075]-[0077], [0080]-[0081], [0084]-[0085], [0094], [0096]-[0097]), and one or more peripheral cavities in communication with said interior volume (i.e., at least ref 340 as disclosed in [0051] and shown in at least Annotated Fig. 3, also see [0055], [0058]-[0059], lacking any further structural distinction thereof), within each of said one or more peripheral cavities a sealed heat sensitive package containing a flowable fire extinguishing material is receivable (i.e., at least fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 filled with gaseous fire extinguishing agent located in the upper cavity ref. 340 as disclosed in [0105]-[0106], such that the skilled artisan would appreciate that said fire extinguishing container is at least a sealed heat sensitive package containing a flow fire extinguishing material so that as disclosed in [0107] the fire extinguishing hose ref. 3840 quickly melts and breaks when the temperature is too high or an open flame is generated in a certain charging compartment ref. 351, such that this allows the gaseous fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 to quickly flow into the corresponding charging compartment ref. 351, etc., and lacking any further distinction thereof), wherein said heat sensitive package is confined by the partitions defining the one or more peripheral cavities cavity within which it is received so as to remain in fixed spatial relationship to said interior volume and separated therefrom (i.e., at least as shown in Annotated Fig. 37). Since Xiao discloses in [0106] as shown in Fig. 38, fire-fighting device ref. 3710 includes a fire extinguishing container support ref. 3810, which is located inside the upper cavity ref. 340, whereby a fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 is provided at the fire extinguishing container support ref. 3810, etc., and further discloses in [0106]-[0107] the opening of the fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 is connected to a fire extinguishing hose ref. 3840, etc., and the fire extinguishing hose ref. 3840 quickly melts and breaks when the temperature is too high or an open flame is generated in a certain charging compartment ref. 351, such that this allows the gaseous fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 to quickly flow into the corresponding charging compartment ref. 351, etc., this at least provides said heat sensitive package is configured to be sufficiently deformed so as to become perforated in at least one package region during exposure to a predetermined fire-induced temperature when said battery is inflamed, thereby allowing the contained fire extinguishing material to be discharged from said package via a perforation at said at least one package region, to flow into said interior volume, and to extinguish the fire, such that the skilled artisan would appreciate that said at least one package region is broad in scope, and is at least a fire extinguishing hose of said fire extinguishing container so as to quickly melt and break (i.e., at least perforate) when the temperature is too high or an open flame is generated in a certain charging compartment, thereby allowing the gaseous fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing container to quickly flow into the corresponding charging compartment, etc., lacking any further structural distinction thereof. PNG media_image1.png 1050 1335 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 3 (Xiao) PNG media_image2.png 716 718 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 37 (Xiao) Regarding claim 9, Xiao discloses the apparatus as discussed above in claim 1. Xiao further discloses in [0004] traditional electric bicycles require the charge to be plugged into the charging port on the bicycle body for charging, however, due to the large size of the electric bicycles, charging is inconvenient, therefore, rechargeable batteries that can be separated from the electric vehicle body, etc., and further discloses in [0014] the present invention provides a charging cabinet, the cabinet main body includes a plurality of independent charging compartments for placing rechargeable batteries, etc., which at least provides (in an embodiment) the rechargeable electric battery is a rechargeable electric bicycle battery. Furthermore, the examiner notes MPEP 2115: "Expressions relating the apparatus to contents thereof during an intended operation are of no significance in determining patentability of the apparatus claim." Ex parte Thibault, 164 USPQ 666, 667 (Bd. App. 1969). Furthermore, "[i]nclusion of material or article worked upon by a structure being claimed does not impart patentability to the claims." In re Young, and the limitations relating to how the claimed apparatus works on the "the rechargeable battery" (i.e., the material worked upon) do not distinguish the claims from the prior art. Therefore, the limitation “the rechargeable electric battery is a rechargeable electric bicycle battery” does not provide additional structure to the apparatus, such that the material or article worked upon (i.e., rechargeable battery) by said apparatus being claimed does not impart patentability to the claims. Claims 2-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xiao as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Leng et al. (CN213720854(U) and using Machine Translation as English version), hereinafter Leng. Regarding claim 2, Xiao discloses the apparatus as discussed above in claim 1. Xiao further discloses in [0060] the compartment doors ref. 140 are all hinged to the corresponding charging compartments ref. 351, and each compartment door ref. 140 is equipped with an electronic lock, etc., which at least provides the plurality of partitions is mounted within an enclosed charging station (also see Figs. 1-4), and lacking any further distinction thereof. Although Xiao is silent as to the plurality of partitions is resistant to the fire-induced temperature, since Xiao discloses the plurality of partitions that are identical and/or substantially identical to that as claimed, properties and/or functions such as resistant to the fire-induced temperature are presumed inherent (MPEP 2112.01, I., II.). In the alternative, and in the interest of compact prosecution, Leng teaches a high-flame-retardant storage cabinet made of polyamide material (Title). Leng further teaches in [n0006] a storage cabinet made of highly flame-retardant polyamide material, comprising a cabinet body, wherein the cabinet body is composed of a plurality of unit cabinets, wherein the plurality of unit cabinets are independently arranged and arranged in a matrix, wherein the unit cabinets comprise cabinet doors and cabinet boxes, etc. Leng further teaches in [n0002] the lockers are made of high-quality cold-rolled steel plates and have superior performance that traditional wood lockers cannot match, etc., which at least provides a lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have modified Xiao with the teachings of Leng, whereby the charging station mounted fire extinguishing facilitating apparatus including the interconnected partitions, interior volume, one or more peripheral cavities, flowable fire extinguishing material, lockable cabinet, etc., as disclosed by Xiao further includes lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction as taught by Leng so as to have superior performance that traditional wood lockers cannot match. Therefore, since the combined teachings of Xiao and Leng disclose the plurality of partitions that are identical and/or substantially identical to that as claimed, properties and/or functions such as resistant to the fire-induced temperature are presumed inherent (MPEP 2112.01, I., II.). Regarding claim 3, Xiao discloses the apparatus as discussed above in claim 2. Xiao further discloses in [0060] the compartment doors ref. 140 are all hinged to the corresponding charging compartments ref. 351, and each compartment door ref. 140 is equipped with an electronic lock, etc., which at least provides the enclosed charging station is configured as a lockable cabinet (also see Figs. 1-4, 37, etc.). However, Xiao is silent as to the enclosed charging station is configured as a lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction. Leng teaches a high-flame-retardant storage cabinet made of polyamide material (Title). Leng further teaches in [n0006] a storage cabinet made of highly flame-retardant polyamide material, comprising a cabinet body, wherein the cabinet body is composed of a plurality of unit cabinets, wherein the plurality of unit cabinets are independently arranged and arranged in a matrix, wherein the unit cabinets comprise cabinet doors and cabinet boxes, etc. Leng further teaches in [n0002] the lockers are made of high-quality cold-rolled steel plates and have superior performance that traditional wood lockers cannot match, etc., which at least provides a lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have modified Xiao with the teachings of Leng, whereby the charging station mounted fire extinguishing facilitating apparatus including the interconnected partitions, interior volume, one or more peripheral cavities, flowable fire extinguishing material, lockable cabinet, etc., as disclosed by Xiao further includes lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction as taught by Leng so as to have superior performance that traditional wood lockers cannot match. Regarding claim 4, Xiao discloses the apparatus as discussed above in claim 3. Xiao further discloses in [0060] the compartment doors ref. 140 are all hinged to the corresponding charging compartments ref. 351, and each compartment door ref. 140 is equipped with an electronic lock, etc., such that as shown in at least Annotated Fig. 3 above in claim 1 the enclosed charging station is at least configured as an array of the lockable cabinets. However, Xiao is silent as to the enclosed charging station is configured as a lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction. Leng teaches a high-flame-retardant storage cabinet made of polyamide material (Title). Leng further teaches in [n0006] a storage cabinet made of highly flame-retardant polyamide material, comprising a cabinet body, wherein the cabinet body is composed of a plurality of unit cabinets, wherein the plurality of unit cabinets are independently arranged and arranged in a matrix, wherein the unit cabinets comprise cabinet doors and cabinet boxes, etc. Leng further teaches in [n0002] the lockers are made of high-quality cold-rolled steel plates and have superior performance that traditional wood lockers cannot match, etc., which at least provides a lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have modified Xiao with the teachings of Leng, whereby the charging station mounted fire extinguishing facilitating apparatus including the interconnected partitions, interior volume, one or more peripheral cavities, flowable fire extinguishing material, lockable cabinet, etc., as disclosed by Xiao further includes lockable cabinet made of solid steel construction as taught by Leng so as to have superior performance that traditional wood lockers cannot match. Regarding claim 5, The combined teachings of Xiao and Leng disclose the apparatus as discussed above in claim 2. Xiao further discloses in [0059] the first panel ref. 130, the first cover plate ref. 210, the second panel ref. 150, the door ref. 140, the bottom plate ref. 320 and the top plate ref. 330 are provided with heat dissipation holes ref. 420 corresponding to the heat dissipation cavity, and the side plate ref. 111 is provided with heat dissipation holes ref. 160 corresponding to the charging compartment ref. 351, etc., which at least provides one or more of the partitions is of openwork construction defining a plurality of openings through which the fire extinguishing material is able to flow from one of the peripheral cavities to the interior volume, such that as disclosed in [0059] the heat dissipation holes ref. 160 allow the charging compartment ref. 351, the upper cavity ref. 340, and the rear cavity to communicate with the outside world and the heat dissipation cavity ref. 420, thereby effectively dissipating the heat generated inside the cabinet body ref. 110 during the charging process and thus effectively preventing various hidden dangers caused by high temperature. Furthermore, since Xiao discloses one or more of the partitions is of openwork construction defining a plurality of openings, which is a product that is identical and/or substantially identical to the product as claimed, properties and/or functions such as through which the fire extinguishing material is able to flow from one of the peripheral cavities to the interior volume, are presumed inherent (MPEP 2112.01, I., II.), thereby effectively dissipating the heat generated inside the cabinet body ref. 110 during the charging process and thus effectively preventing various hidden dangers caused by high temperature. Regarding claim 6, The combined teachings of Xiao and Leng disclose the apparatus as discussed above in claim 3. Xiao further discloses in [0059] the first panel ref. 130, the first cover plate ref. 210, the second panel ref. 150, the door ref. 140, the bottom plate ref. 320 and the top plate ref. 330 are provided with heat dissipation holes ref. 420 corresponding to the heat dissipation cavity, and the side plate ref. 111 is provided with heat dissipation holes ref. 160 corresponding to the charging compartment ref. 351, etc., which at least provides the plurality of interconnected partitions is configured as a main cage made at least partially of openwork construction and that is mounted within the charging station cabinet, such that as disclosed in [0059] the heat dissipation holes ref. 160 allow the charging compartment ref. 351, the upper cavity ref. 340, and the rear cavity to communicate with the outside world and the heat dissipation cavity ref. 420, thereby effectively dissipating the heat generated inside the cabinet body ref. 110 during the charging process and thus effectively preventing various hidden dangers caused by high temperature (also see Annotated Fig. 3 above in claim 1, Figs. 1-4, and Fig. 37). Regarding claim 7, The combined teachings of Xiao and Leng disclose the apparatus as discussed above in claim 6. Xiao further discloses an upper cage component mounted within the charging station cabinet above the main cage so as to be in communication with the interior volume, and defining another package-receivable cavity (i.e., at least as shown in Annotated Fig. 3 above in claim 1, also see [0105]-[0108], Figs. 1-4, 37), such that said upper cage component above the main cage is at least in communication with the interior volume so that as disclosed in [0059] the heat dissipation holes ref. 160 allow the charging compartment ref. 351, the upper cavity ref. 340, and the rear cavity to communicate with the outside world and the heat dissipation cavity ref. 420, thereby effectively dissipating the heat generated inside the cabinet body ref. 110 during the charging process and thus effectively preventing various hidden dangers caused by high temperature, etc., and lacking any further structural distinction thereof. Furthermore, since Xiao discloses in [0052] the rear side of the back plate ref. 310, together with the bottom plate ref. 320, the top plate ref. 330 and the side plate ref. 111, forms a rear cavity, etc., this at least provides an upper cage component mounted within the charging station cabinet above the main cage so as to be in communication with the interior volume, and defining another package-receivable cavity. Therefore, in one or more embodiments, Xiao at least discloses upper cage component(s), a main cage, and cavity(s), such that as disclosed said limitations are broad in scope, lacking any further structural distinction thereof. Furthermore, since Xiao discloses an upper cage component mounted within the charging station cabinet above the main cage so as to be in communication with the interior volume, which is an identical and/or substantially identical product to that claimed, properties and/or functions such as defining another package-receivable cavity are presumed inherent (MPEP 2112.01, I.). Furthermore, since Xiao discloses in [0106] as shown in Fig. 38, fire-fighting device ref. 3710 includes a fire extinguishing container support ref. 3810, which is located inside the upper cavity ref. 340, whereby a fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 is provided at the fire extinguishing container support ref. 3810, etc., and further discloses in [0106]-[0107] the opening of the fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 is connected to a fire extinguishing hose ref. 3840, etc., and the fire extinguishing hose ref. 3840 quickly melts and breaks when the temperature is too high or an open flame is generated in a certain charging compartment ref. 351, such that this allows the gaseous fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 to quickly flow into the corresponding charging compartment ref. 351, etc., the skilled artisan before the effective filing date would appreciate duplicating said package-receivable cavity(s) (MPEP 2144.04, IV., B., In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960) ) so as to allow the gaseous fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing container to quickly flow into the corresponding charging compartment, etc. Regarding claim 8, The combined teachings of Xiao and Leng disclose the apparatus as discussed above in claim 6. Xiao further discloses a lower cage component securely positioned on top of a cabinet bottom surface below the main cage so as to be in communication with the interior volume via a bottom cage section of the main cage and defining another package-receivable cavity (i.e., at least as shown in Annotated Fig. 3 above in claim 1, also see [0105]-[0108], Figs. 1-4, 37), such that said lower cage component on top of a cabinet bottom surface below the main cage is at least in communication with the interior volume so that as disclosed in [0063] the bent portion of the base plate ref. 320 and the side plate ref. 111 together form the bottom heat dissipation cavity ref. 380, and the formation of the bottom heat dissipation cavity ref. 380 can better increase the heat dissipation channel, thereby better improving the heat dissipation capacity, etc., (also see Figs. 1-4, [0094]). Furthermore, since Xiao a lower cage component securely positioned on top of a cabinet bottom surface below the main cage so as to be in communication with the interior volume via a bottom cage section of the main cage, which is an identical and/or substantially identical product to that claimed, properties and/or functions such as defining another package-receivable cavity are presumed inherent (MPEP 2112.01, I.). Furthermore, since Xiao discloses in [0106] as shown in Fig. 38, fire-fighting device ref. 3710 includes a fire extinguishing container support ref. 3810, which is located inside the upper cavity ref. 340, whereby a fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 is provided at the fire extinguishing container support ref. 3810, etc., and further discloses in [0106]-[0107] the opening of the fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 is connected to a fire extinguishing hose ref. 3840, etc., and the fire extinguishing hose ref. 3840 quickly melts and breaks when the temperature is too high or an open flame is generated in a certain charging compartment ref. 351, such that this allows the gaseous fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing container ref. 3820 to quickly flow into the corresponding charging compartment ref. 351, etc., the skilled artisan before the effective filing date would appreciate duplicating said package-receivable cavity(s) (MPEP 2144.04, IV., B., In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960) ) so as to allow the gaseous fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing container to quickly flow into the corresponding charging compartment, etc. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-4 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 in view of Zhou and Leng have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Therefore, in light of the amendments to the claims, a new grounds of 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection is made in view of Xiao for claims 1 and 9. See the current rejection of record for the claims that depend therefrom. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zhou et al. (U.S. PGPub US 2022/0336921 A1) discloses a battery system and fire extinguishing method for battery system (Title), whereby as disclosed in [0056] the fire extinguishing apparatus may control spray time of the fire extinguishing agent in the fire extinguishing apparatus in an electric control manner, and when the apparatus is started, a large amount of fire extinguishing agent can be instantaneously sprayed to suppress burning of the battery module, etc. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA PATRICK MCCLURE whose telephone number is (571)272-2742. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached on (571) 272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA P MCCLURE/Examiner, Art Unit 1727 /BARBARA L GILLIAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Dec 11, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577203
A SOLUTION OF TEMPO-DERIVATIVES FOR USE AS ELECTROLYTE IN REDOX-FLOW CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12555865
COVER FOR A BATTERY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12537267
BATTERY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12519160
THERMAL RUNAWAY SUPPRESSANT OF LITHIUM BATTERIES AND THE RELATED APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12476264
SYSTEM FOR REBALANCING A PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL IN A FUEL CELL USING GAS INJECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+14.4%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 76 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month