Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/963,630

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING UPLINK CHANNEL FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 11, 2022
Priority
Oct 08, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0134207
Examiner
SIXTO, NANCY
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
6 granted / 8 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
47
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.8%
+49.8% vs TC avg
§102
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 8 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 5, 9, 13 and 17-28 are presented for examination. Claims 1, 5, 9, 13 and 17-28 are amended. Claims 2-4, 6-8, 10-12 and 14-16 are cancelled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 5, 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks pages 8-9, filed March 5, 2026, with respect to claims 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 20, 23, and 26 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 rejection of claims 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 20, 23, and 26 has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks page 8, filed March 5, 2026, with respect to claims 18 and 19 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 rejections of claims 18 and 19 have been withdrawn. Dependent claims 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, and 28 depend on independent claims 1, 5, 9 or 13. Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks pages 8-9, filed March 5, 2026, with respect to claims 1, 5, 9, and 13, have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 rejections of dependent claims 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, and 28 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 5, 9, 13 and 17-28 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 claims “wherein a repetitive MsgA transmission includes at least one of the PRACH or the PUSCH” followed by two conditional limitations that may result in a Msg A transmission that does not include a PRACH or a PUSCH if the RSRP of the measured pathloss is greater than both the second and third RSRP thresholds. Since there is no limitation that precludes the measured downlink pathloss reference from being greater than both the second and third RSRP thresholds, the possibility exists that neither the PRACH nor the PUSCH meet the criteria set forth in the conditional limitations to be included in the Msg A transmission. This scenario would directly contradict the previous limitation where a repetitive MsgA transmission must include “at least one of the PRACH or the PUSCH”. There is also no limitation that precludes the second and third RSRP thresholds from being the same. In this scenario, if the measured downlink pathloss is greater than the second RSRP threshold it will also be greater than the third RSRP threshold. This would also result in a MsgA transmission that does not include either the PRACH or the PUSCH, directly contradicting the preceding claim limitation that requires “at least one of the PRACH or the PUSCH”. Claims 5, 9 and 13 recite similar limitations as set forth in claim 1, thus the rejection for claim 1 is also applicable to claims 5, 9 and 13. The dependent claim(s) 17-19, 20-22, 23-25 and 26-28 depends directly or indirectly from rejected independent claims 1, 5, 9 and 13, respectfully, and therefore, claims 17-28 are rejected based on its dependency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 5, 9 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 17-28 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Liu (WO 2022028341 A1) discloses a Random Access coverage enhancement method for a two-step Random Access Procedure. When the signal quality is lower than a second threshold, PUSCH time-domain repeated resources are used. When the signal quality is greater than a second threshold, PUSCH time-domain non-repetitive resources are used. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NANCY SIXTO whose telephone number is (571)272-3295. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Friday 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached at 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NANCY SIXTO/Examiner, Art Unit 2465 /GARY MUI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2465
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Apr 11, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 07, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12457594
RAN APPLICATIONS FOR INTER-CELL INTERFERENCE MITIGATION FOR MASSIVE MIMO IN A RAN
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Patent 12363587
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DUPLICATE PDU DISCARDING FOR MULTI-PATH TRANSMISSION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.0%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 8 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month