Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/963,688

CAMERA MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 11, 2022
Examiner
QURESHI, MARIAM
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
463 granted / 624 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
675
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 624 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/18/25 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments are moot in view of the amendments to the claims and the new grounds of rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US Publication No.: US 2014/0071335 A1 of record) in view of Hwang et al (US Publication No.: US 2017/0134628 A1, “Hwang”). Regarding Claim 1, Lee discloses a camera module (Figures 1-70 comprising: A lens module comprising a lens barrel (Figure 4, lens barrel 170) and one or more lenses (Figure 4, lens module 210; Paragraph 0060); A fixing frame having a rectangular cross-section formed along a circumference of the lens module (Figure 4, fixing frame 110); A first driver, disposed along a side surface of the fixing frame, configured to provide a first driving force in a first direction intersecting an optical axis of the lenses (Figure 4; Figure 9, first driver 310; Paragraph 0075); and A cam assembly configured to convert the first driving force into a second driving force in an optical axis direction (Paragraph 0058; Figures 2-4, second driving force pushes lens in and out along optical axis direction). Lee fails to explicitly disclose that the lens barrel is configured to move in an optical axis direction separately and independently from the lens module. However, Hwang discloses a similar lens barrel that is configured to move in an optical axis direction separately and independent from the lens module (Hwang, Paragraph 0092 discloses that the moving lens barrels move independently of the lens module). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the camera module as disclosed by Lee to include a lens barrel that moves separately and independently as disclosed by Hwang. One would have been motivated to do so for the purpose of correcting a shaking movement of a user’s hand (Hwang, Paragraph 0092). Regarding Claim 2, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 1, wherein the first driver comprises: a drive motor (Figure 10, drive motor 320); and an operation member configured to move on a drive shaft of the drive motor in the first direction (Figure 10, operation member 330). Regarding Claim 3, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 1, wherein the cam assembly comprises: a first cam member configured to move in the first direction, the first cam member having a first projection protruding toward a side surface of the lens module; and a second cam member extending in a diagonal direction with respect to the first direction, the second cam member having a first cam groove configured to fit the first projection and a guide groove extending in the optical axis direction (Paragraph 0058; Figure 4, cam assembly 180; Paragraph 0089). Regarding Claim 4, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 3, wherein the first cam groove is open toward a lower portion of the second cam member, and the guide groove is open toward an upper portion of the second cam member (Figure 4, the first cam groove is the upper groove and the second cam groove is the lower groove; Paragraph 0089). Regarding Claim 5, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 1, wherein the fixing frame comprises: a lower fixing frame having a seat portion configured to partially contact a protrusion portion extending in a direction opposite to the first projection from a side surface of the first cam member (Figure 4, lower fixing frame (lower of) 130); and an upper fixing frame having a second projection configured to fit into a guide groove of the second cam member (Figure 4, upper fixing frame (top portion of) 130). Regarding Claim 6, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 1, further comprising: a first shield can configured to surround a circumference of the fixing frame (Figure 4, first shield can 120); a second shield can configured to cover an upper portion of the second cam member (Figure 4, second shield 160); and an airtight member configured to seal a space between the first shield and the second shield (Figure 4, airtight member 130). Regarding Claim 7, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 1, wherein the lens module further comprises: a housing; and the lens barrel is disposed in the housing (Figure 4, housing 120, lens barrel 170). Regarding Claim 8, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 7, further comprising: an elastic member, disposed between the housing and the lens barrel, configured to provide inertial force pushing up the lens barrel upwardly (Figure 1, elastic member 160). Regarding Claim 9, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the lens module further comprises: a first movable frame, disposed in the housing, configured to move in the optical axis direction; a second movable frame, disposed on the first movable frame, configured to move in the first direction intersecting the optical axis; and a barrel holder disposed on the second movable frame and coupled to the lens barrel (Figure 4, first movable frame 150, second moveable frame 250; barrel holder 120). Regarding Claim 10, Lee in view of Hwang discloses the camera module of claim 9, wherein the lens module further comprises a second driver configured to drive the first movable frame in the optical axis direction or to drive the second movable frame in the first direction intersecting the optical axis (Figure 4, Figure 10, second driver 350; Paragraph 0075). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIAM QURESHI whose telephone number is (571)272-4434. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Caley can be reached at 571-272-2286. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARIAM QURESHI/Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601893
OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596248
PATTERN ELECTRODE STRUCTURE FOR ELECTRO-WETTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596272
CORRESPONDENCE GENERATION METHOD, CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR MICRO RING MODULATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596254
HEAD-MOUNTABLE DEVICE WITH CONNECTABLE ACCESSORIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596257
DISPLAYS INCLUDING LIGHT-GUIDE OPTICAL ELEMENTS WITH TWO-DIMENSIONAL EXPANSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.2%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 624 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month