Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/965,624

METHOD FOR CONFIGURING SIDELINK RESOURCES BASED ON USER EQUIPMENT SPEED IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AN APPARATUS FOR THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 13, 2022
Examiner
ZHU, BO HUI ALVIN
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
6 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
627 granted / 780 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
804
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Amendment filed on 08/28/2025 has been entered. Claims 1, 3, 6-8, 10, 13, 16, 18, and 19 are pending. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “zone time” in line 14 appears to be a typo and should be changed to “zone type”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1, 3, 6-8, 10, 13, 16, 18, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Adachi et al. (US 2019/0174503 A1), hereinafter “Adachi”, in view of Mok et al. (US 2018/0124771 A1), hereinafter “Mok”. Regarding claim 1: Adachi discloses aa user equipment (UE) (Fig. 5, 100), comprising: a processor (Fig. 5, 130), wherein the processor causes the UE to: receive a message that includes a speed threshold, zone configuration information, and resource pool configuration information (Para [0063], [0106]-[0110], [0137]-[0139], “configuration information” (information of zones and transmission resource pools), [0142], “threshold value” (for comparison with a movement speed)) from a base station (Fig. 6, 200); select a zone type among a plurality of zone types indicated by the zone configuration information based on a comparison result of the speed threshold and a speed of the UE (Para. [0142], “select configuration information according to a movement state (movement speed) of the UE”, “configuration information for which the zone is calculated to be small”, “configuration information for which the zone is calculated to be large”); determine a zone identifier based on the selected zone type (Para. [0145]-[0149], “the UE 100-1 identifies the zone in which the UE 100-1 is located based on the selected configuration information”); and perform sidelink (SL) communication using a resource pool mapped to the determined zone identifier among one or more resource pools indicated by the resource pool configuration information (Para. [0150], “the UE 100-1 selects a transmission resource pool associated with the identified zone”, Fig. 10, S120-140), wherein the plurality of zone types have different zone-sizes, and a zone-size of the selected zone type is different from a zone-size of other zone type except for the selected zone type among the plurality of zone types (Para. [0142], “configuration information for which the zone is calculated to be small” and “configuration information for which the zone is calculated to be large”). Adachi does not disclose the processor causes the UE to receive a request for information regarding a position of the UE from a base station; transmit the information regarding the position of the UE to the base station; transmit at least one of the selected zone type or the determined zone identifier to the base station. Mok teaches a UE receives a request for information regarding a position of the UE from a base station (Para [0067], “the serving BS 110 may include information for causing the terminal 100 to measure the distance in the terminal configuration information to be transmitted”, [0107], “the serving BS 110 may request distance information (measurement) from the terminal 100,”), transmits the information regarding the position of the UE to the base station (Para [0107], “the terminal 100 may measure the distance information to perform a measurement report operation … and may periodically transmit the measurement report”); and the UE transmit a zone identifier to the base station (Para [0148], “the terminal 100 may provide information for determining whether the service area of the target BS 620 is the same as the service area of the serving BS 610 by including location information (e.g., absolute coordinates or zone ID) of the terminal 100 in the measurement report message and explicitly transmitting the corresponding location to the BS,” [0226], “The resource request information of the terminal may include at least one of a zone ID of the terminal,” and [0246]-[0248]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Adachi in view of Mok to include the features that the processor causes the UE to receive a request for information regarding a position of the UE from a base station; transmit the information regarding the position of the UE to the base station, and transmit at least one of the selected zone type or the determined zone identifier to the base station, in order to enhance service reliability of the network. Regarding claim 3: Adachi further discloses wherein the resource pool configuration information includes configuration information of resource pools for a high-zone and configuration information of resource pools for a low-zone (Para. [0106]-[0110], [0137]-[0139], [0145], and [0149]). Regarding claim 6: Adachi further discloses the message is a system information block (SIB) (Para. [0107]). Regarding claim 7: Adachi does not disclose wherein the processor further causes the UE to: before receiving the message, transmit the speed of the UE to the base station. Mok teaches before receiving zone configuration information or resource pool configuration information, transmitting the speed of the UE to the base station (Fig. 1A, 103, “Distance information” (before receiving zone configuration information 106, Para. [0084], Fig. 2F, 1506 “UE location” (before receiving a resource pool information 1508)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Adachi in view of Mok to include the feature that wherein the processor further causes the UE to: before receiving the message, transmit the speed of the UE to the base station, in order to enhance resource configuration information selection for user equipment. Regarding claim 8: Adachi discloses a base station (Fig.6, 200), comprising: a processor (Fig. 6, 230), wherein the processor causes the base station to: determine a speed threshold, a first sidelink (SL) resource, and a second SL resource; and transmit a message including the speed threshold, information of the first SL resource, and information of the second SL resource (Para [0063], [0106]-[0110], [0137]-[0139], “configuration information” (information of zones and transmission resource pools), [0142], “threshold value” (for comparison with a movement speed)) to a user equipment (UE) (Fig. 5, 100); transmit a message including the speed threshold, zone configuration information, and resource pool configuration information (Para [0063], [0106]-[0110], [0137]-[0139], “configuration information” (information of zones and transmission resource pools), [0142], “threshold value” (for comparison with a movement speed)) to the UE (Fig. 6, 200); the UE determines a zone identifier based on a selected zone type among a plurality of zone types indicated by the zone configuration information (Para. [0145]-[0149], “the UE 100-1 identifies the zone in which the UE 100-1 is located based on the selected configuration information”); and wherein the plurality of zone types have different zone-sizes, and a zone-size of the selected zone type is different from a zone-size of other zone type except for the selected zone type among the plurality of zone types (Para. [0142], “configuration information for which the zone is calculated to be small” and “configuration information for which the zone is calculated to be large”). Adachi does not disclose the processor causes the base station to transmit a request for information regarding a position of a user equipment (UE) to the UE; receive the information regarding the position of the UE from the UE; receive at least one of a zone type selected by the UE among a plurality of zone types indicated by the zone configuration information or a zone identifier determined by the UE based on the selected zone type from the UE. Mok teaches a UE receives a request for information regarding a position of the UE from a base station (Para [0067], “the serving BS 110 may include information for causing the terminal 100 to measure the distance in the terminal configuration information to be transmitted”, [0107], “the serving BS 110 may request distance information (measurement) from the terminal 100,”), transmits the information regarding the position of the UE to the base station (Para [0107], “the terminal 100 may measure the distance information to perform a measurement report operation … and may periodically transmit the measurement report”); and the UE transmit a zone identifier to the base station (Para [0148], “the terminal 100 may provide information for determining whether the service area of the target BS 620 is the same as the service area of the serving BS 610 by including location information (e.g., absolute coordinates or zone ID) of the terminal 100 in the measurement report message and explicitly transmitting the corresponding location to the BS,” [0226], “The resource request information of the terminal may include at least one of a zone ID of the terminal,” and [0246]-[0248]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Adachi in view of Mok to include the features that the processor causes the base station to transmit a request for information regarding a position of a user equipment (UE) to the UE; receive the information regarding the position of the UE from the UE; receive at least one of a zone type selected by the UE among a plurality of zone types indicated by the zone configuration information or a zone identifier determined by the UE based on the selected zone type from the UE, in order to enhance service reliability of the network. Regarding claim 10: Adachi further discloses wherein the resource pool configuration information includes configuration information of resource pools for a high-zone and configuration information of resource pools for a low-zone (Para. [0106]-[0110], [0137]-[0139], [0145], and [0149]). Regarding claims 13, 16, 18 and 19: See rejections of claims 1, 3, 6, and 7 regarding similar features. Response to Arguments Rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Adachi, Mok, and Zhang Applicants’ arguments with respect to independent claims 1, 8 and 13 as amended have been considered and are moot in view of the new ground of rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 based on Adachi and Mok. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alvin ZHU whose telephone number is (571)270-1086. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6am-9am and 2pm-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached at 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BO HUI A ZHU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 13, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 13, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 30, 2023
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Jun 10, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 21, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 24, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 29, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 28, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 28, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598611
INFORMATION SENDING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593335
LOGICAL CHANNELS AND SCHEDULING REQUEST CONFIGURATIONS FOR FULL-DUPLEX MODES AND HALF-DUPLEX MODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588028
Restriction of Configured Grant Resource Occasion
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580693
Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request Acknowledgment Scheduling
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574182
METHOD PERFORMED BY USER EQUIPMENT, AND USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.1%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month