Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/969,518

MULTI-CHANNEL MEMORY MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 19, 2022
Examiner
HARCUM, MARCUS E
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
507 granted / 565 resolved
+21.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
583
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 565 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/19/2022 was filed on the mailing date of the application. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 11-13 and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang [US 2020/0083623]. Regarding claim 1, Huang discloses a memory module comprising: a printed circuit board (PCB) (fig. 1; 12) having a first face (fig. 2; 13), a second face (fig. 2; 15), and a first edge (fig. 2; 23) to be received by a connector (fig. 4; 30); a plurality of memory chips (fig. 2; 14) on at least one of the first and second faces (13, 15) of the PCB (12); and two rows of conductive contacts (fig. 1; 16, 18) on each of the first and second faces (13, 15) of the PCB (12), the two rows (16, 18) including a first row of conductive contacts (16) proximate to the first edge (23) of the PCB to be received by the connector (30), and a second row of conductive contacts (18) between the first row (16) and a second edge (fig. 2; top edge of 12) of the PCB opposite to the first edge (23). Regarding claim 2, Huang discloses wherein: the second row of conductive contacts (18) is between the first row (16) and the plurality of memory chips (14). Regarding claim 3, Huang discloses wherein: the first row of conductive contacts (16) is to couple with a plurality of inner pins (fig. 4; 34) of the connector (30); and the second row of conductive contacts (18) is to couple with a plurality of outer pins (fig. 4; 36) of the connector (30). Regarding claim 11, Huang discloses a dual-inline memory module (DIMM) comprising: a printed circuit board (PCB) (12) having a first face (13), a second face (15), and an edge (23) to be received by a DIMM connector (30); a plurality of DRAM chips (14) on each of the first and second faces (13, 15) of the PCB; a bottom row of conductive contacts (16) on each of the first and second faces (13, 15) of the PCB (12) at the edge (23) of the PCB to be received by the DIMM connector (30); and a top row of conductive contacts (18) on each of the first and second faces (13, 15) of the PCB, wherein the top row (18) is aligned over and parallel to the bottom row of conductive contacts (13). Regarding claim 12, Huang discloses wherein: the top row of conductive contacts (18) is between the bottom row (16) and the plurality of DRAM chips (14). Regarding claim 13, Huang discloses wherein: the bottom row of conductive contacts (16) is to couple with a plurality of inner pins (34) of the DIMM connector (30); and the top row of conductive contacts (18) is to couple with a plurality of outer pins (36) of the DIMM connector (30). Regarding claim 16, Huang discloses a system comprising: a processor (fig. 32; 980a), and a memory module coupled (fig. 32; 910) with the processor (980a), the memory module (910) including (910 and 930 may be formed in accordance with other embodiments i.e. figs. 1 and 2; see Par [0070] Ln 12-14): a printed circuit board (PCB) (12) having a first face (13), a second face (15), and a first edge (23) to be received by a connector (30); a plurality of memory chips (14) on at least one of the first and second faces (13, 15) of the PCB; and two rows of conductive contacts (16, 18) on each of the first and second faces (13, 15) of the PCB, the two rows (16, 18) including a first row of conductive contacts (16) proximate to the first edge (23) of the PCB to be received by the connector (30), and a second row of conductive contacts (18) between the first row (16) and a second edge (top edge of 12) of the PCB opposite to the first edge (23). Regarding claim 17, Huang discloses wherein: the second row of conductive contacts (18) is between the first row (16) and the plurality of memory chips (14). Regarding claim 18, Huang discloses wherein: the first row of conductive contacts (16) is to couple with a plurality of inner pins (34) of the connector (30); and the second row of conductive contacts (18) is to couple with a plurality of outer pins (36) of the connector (30). Regarding claim 19, Huang discloses a motherboard (fig. 32; 950) including the connector (fig. 32; 930). Regarding claim 20, Huang discloses one or more of: a display (fig. 32; 984), a battery, and a power supply. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 5, 7, 8, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang [US 2020/0083623] in view of Amidi et al. [US 2008/0123305]. Regarding claims 4, 5, 7, 8, 14 and 15, Huang discloses all of the claim limitations except wherein: the two rows of conductive contacts on each of the first and second faces of the PCB are to couple with two memory channels [claim 4]; wherein: the first and second rows of conductive contacts on the first face of the PCB are to couple with a first memory channel; and the first and second rows of conductive contacts on the second face of the PCB are to couple with a second memory channel [claim 5]; a first registering clock driver (RCD) on the PCB to receive command and address signals for a first of the two memory channels; and a second RCD on the PCB to receive command and address signals for a second of the two memory channels [claim 7]; the first RCD is on a first face of the PCB; and the second RCD is on a second face of the PCB [claim 8]; wherein: the bottom rows and the top rows of conductive contacts on each of the first and second faces of the PCB are to couple with two memory channels [claim 14]; wherein: the bottom rows and the top rows of conductive contacts on the first face of the PCB are to couple with a first memory channel; and the bottom rows and the top rows of conductive contacts on the second face of the PCB are to couple with a second memory channel [claim 15]. Regarding claims 4, 5, 7, 8, 14 and 15, Amidi teaches the row of conductive contacts (figs. 9a-b; 194) on each of the first and second faces (figs. 9a-b; 155a, 155b) of the PCB (191) are to couple with two memory channels (figs. 9a-b; 190a-b); wherein: half of the row of conductive contacts (194) on the first and second faces (155a-b) of the PCB (191) are to couple with a first memory channel (190a); and half of the row of conductive contacts (194) on the first and second faces (155a-b) of the PCB (191) are to couple with a second memory channel (190b); a first registering clock driver (RCD) (figs. 9a-b; 152a) on the PCB to receive command and address signals for a first (190a) of the two memory channels (190a-b); and a second RCD (152b) on the PCB to receive command and address signals for a second (190b) of the two memory channels (190a-b); the first RCD (152a) is on a first face (155a) of the PCB (191); and the second RCD (152b) is on a second face (155b) of the PCB (191). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the bottom and top/two rows of conductive contacts on each of the first and second faces of the PCB being coupled with two memory channels, the first/bottom and second/top rows of conductive contacts on the first face of the PCB are to couple with a first memory channel; and the first/bottom and second/top rows of conductive contacts on the second face of the PCB are to couple with a second memory channel, a first registering clock driver (RCD) on the PCB to receive command and address signals for a first of the two memory channels; and a second RCD on the PCB to receive command and address signals for a second of the two memory channels and the first RCD being on a first face of the PCB; and the second RCD being on a second face of the PCB as suggested by Amidi for the benefit of providing improved information flow between a processor and the memory module to achieve increased overall system performance. Claim(s) 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang [US 2020/0083623] and Amidi et al. [US 2008/0123305] as applied to claim 4 above, and further in view of Lee et al. [US 2019/0237152]. Huang and Amidi disclose all of the limitations except a single registering clock driver (RCD) on the PCB, the single RCD to receive command and address signals for both of the two memory channels. However, Lee teaches a single registering clock driver (RCD) (fig. 5; 530) on the PCB (fig. 5; 502), the single RCD (530) to receive command and address signals for both of the two memory channels (fig. 5; CHA, CHB). Therefore, it would have been further obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate a single registering clock driver (RCD) on the PCB, the single RCD to receive command and address signals for both of the two memory channels as suggested by Lee for the benefit of improving the digital logic of a memory module processor for a simpler design with optimized functionality. Claim(s) 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang [US 2020/0083623]. Regarding claims 9 and 10, Huang (figs. 1-2 embodiment) discloses all of the claim limitations except a third row of conductive contacts between the first row and the second row of conductive contacts [claim 9]; the first row of conductive contacts is to couple with a plurality of inner pins of the connector; the second row of conductive contacts is to couple with a plurality of outer pins of the connector; and the third row of conductive contacts is to couple with a plurality of pins between the plurality of inner pins and the plurality of outer pins [claim 10]. Regarding claims 9 and 10, figs. 23-26 embodiments teach a third row of conductive contacts (figs. 23, 25; 517 or 617) between the first row (516/616) and the second row of conductive contacts (518/618); the first row (516/616) of conductive contacts is to couple with a plurality of inner pins (figs. 24, 26; 534/634) of the connector (figs. 24, 26; 530/630); the second row of conductive contacts (518/618) is to couple with a plurality of outer pins (536/636) of the connector (530-630); and the third row of conductive contacts (517/617) is to couple with a plurality of pins (535/635) between the plurality of inner pins (534/634) and the plurality of outer pins (536/636). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate a third row of conductive contacts between the first row and the second row of conductive contacts and the first row of conductive contacts to couple with a plurality of inner pins of the connector; the second row of conductive contacts to couple with a plurality of outer pins of the connector; and the third row of conductive contacts to couple with a plurality of pins between the plurality of inner pins and the plurality of outer pins as suggested by Huang figs. 23-26 embodiments because it would have been an obvious matter of design choice to have three rows of conductive contacts instead of two since applicant has not disclosed that having three rows over two is a critical factor of the functionality of the invention and it appears that the invention would perform equally well with two rows; it also would have been obvious for the benefit of improving the application of use of a memory module for robust computing purposes. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCUS E HARCUM whose telephone number is (571)272-9986. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARCUS E HARCUM/ Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 19, 2022
Application Filed
May 17, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597728
CONNECTOR INCLUDING TERMINAL LOCKING PORTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592519
SIGNAL CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592530
CLOCK SPRING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582164
AEROSOL DELIVERY DEVICE WITH IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY, AIRFLOW, AND AEROSOL PATHS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586942
CARD EDGE CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month