Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/971,136

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SERVICE LIFE MANAGEMENT USING ACCELERATION FACTOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 21, 2022
Examiner
TIMILSINA, SHARAD
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Dell Products L.P.
OA Round
4 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
122 granted / 161 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 161 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments/Amendment Applicant argument and amendment are considered. Applicant amended independent claims 1, 10 and 16. Claim rejection under 35 U.S.C 103: Further search and consideration found prior arts Storino US 20030078741 A1 and Benlarbi et al US 20120160444 A1 for the amended or added limitations. Please see below at their respective section. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 10, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Asmussen et al. (US 20190371367 A1) herein after “Asmussen” in view of Vichare et al. (US 20170089607 A1) herein after “Vichare”, Webster et al (US 5005410 A) herein after “Webster”, Storino (US 20030078741 A1) Benlarbi et al (US 2012016044 A1) herein after Benlarbi. Regarding claim 1 Asmussen teaches a method for managing environmental conditions of an information handling system (para [0004] corrosion protection (i.e., managing environmental condition) of a tape drive (is viewed to be of an information handling system), comprising: obtaining an ambient temperature of an environment proximate to the information handling system (para [0024] According to an example embodiment of the corrosion protection system, the temperature sensor and/or a humidity sensor are included within the tape drive. Thereby the temperature and/or humidity can be determined in close proximity to the components which should be protected against corrosion. According to other embodiments, the temperature sensor and/or a humidity sensor are external sensors arranged outside the tape drive.) External sensor (i.e., temperature sensor) is viewed to be obtaining an ambient temperature information outside or environment proximate to the tape drive system.; obtaining an ambient humidity of the environment in para [0024] External sensor (i.e., humidity sensor) is viewed to be obtaining an ambient humidity information outside (i.e., environment) the tap drive system; determining a component temperature of a component in the information handling system, using a temperature sensor integrated into the component; (para [0024] According to an example embodiment of the corrosion protection system, the temperature sensor and/or a humidity sensor are included within the tape drive. Thereby the temperature and/or humidity can be determined in close proximity to the components which should be protected against corrosion.) From Fig. 1. Sensors 130, 160 located or included within the tape drive system 100 is viewed to measure proximate temperature or humidity of tape drive component 120; However, Asmussen does not teach determining a component humidity of the component based on the component temperature, the ambient temperature, and the ambient humidity, and using the following equation: Log10Psat(T)= A- (B/(C+T)), where A, B and C are constants, T is the component temperature and Psat(T) is a vapor pressure; determining, in real-time, an acceleration factor for the component based on the component humidity and the component temperature using an Arrhenius- Peck equation as follows; A F = R 1 R 2 - 2.66 * [ e ^ ( ( E a K ) * 1 T 1 - 1 T 2 ) ] where AF is an acceleration factor, R1 is a baseline relative humidity, R2 is the component humidity, E, is a baseline activation energy, K is the Boltzmann's constant, T1, is a baseline temperature, and T2, is the component temperature; storing, in a memory module, the acceleration factor to create a historical information of acceleration factors for the component over time, wherein determining the acceleration factor is also based on the historical information of acceleration factors; determining an estimated useful service life of the component based on the historical information of acceleration factors; and modifying a speed of a fan configured to control airflow through the information handling system based on the acceleration factor when the estimated useful service life falls below a threshold value. Vichare teaches determining a component humidity of the component based on the component temperature, the ambient temperature, and the ambient humidity (para [0016] Information handling system 100 can include multiple temperature sensors. For example, a battery can include a temperature sensor, in addition to an embedded controller for monitoring charging and discharging temperatures of a rechargeable battery. In one embodiment, temperature sensor 190 and humidity sensor 192 can be incorporated at a battery assembly, and the embedded controller can perform one or more of the detection, logging, and remediation techniques disclosed herein. para [0022] The method continues at decision block 206 where it determined whether the current temperature is at or below the dew temperature calculated at block 205. If the current temperature is above the calculated dew temperature, the method returns to block 205 where the dew temperature continues to be monitored. If the current temperature is at or below the calculated dew temperature, it is possible or likely that condensation of water vapor can occur within the information handling system. Corrosion, especially of metallic components, is greatly accelerated by condensation.) Herein current temperature (i.e., viewed to be a temperature within the information handling system or a component temperature) is compared with a dew point value or temperature (i.e., combination of ambient temperature and ambient humidity as suggested by para [0080] and [0085] of instant application) to determine the condensation of water vapor (i.e., related to component humidity or relative humidity) of a component (i.e., battery or metallic components) within the information handling system; storing, in a memory module, the acceleration factor to create a historical information of acceleration factors for the component over time (para [0005] FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for maintaining a record of humidity and condensation events to estimate a corrosion rate at an information handling system according to a specific embodiment of the present disclosure. Para [0023] Method 200 continues at block 207, where the condensation event can be logged. For example, a time and duration of a condensation event can be stored with the temperature and humidity information logged at block 203).; Herein the time and duration of condensation event (i.e., condensation event estimates acceleration factor or corrosion rate) at the information handling system is recorded to create a log (i.e., a historical information) over time and duration, wherein determining the acceleration factor is also based on the historical information of acceleration factors (para [0009…Environmental logs and historical failure data can be used to facilitate diagnosis of a failure at an information handling system. For example, such data may predict that a device failure is due to corrosion of an electrical connector associated with the device, rather than failure of the device itself.); The combination of Assmussen and Vichar do not teach using the following equation: Log10Psat(T)= A- (B/(C+T)), where A, B and C are constants, T is the component temperature and Psat(T) is a vapor pressure; Webster (US 5005410 A) teaches determining a component humidity of the component based on the component temperature, the ambient temperature, ambient humidity based on Antoine equation. (In col 5. Line 54-60. Equation 1. P*V= 10^(A-(B/(Tc+C))), where A, B, C are coefficient or constants, Tc is the measured temperature of sample and P*V saturated vapor pressure. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the invention to have incorporated Webster into Asmussen for the purpose of accurate determination of humidity in an information handling system using an Antoine equation taught be Webster. The combination of Assmussen, Vichar and Webster do not teach determining, in real-time, an acceleration factor for the component based on the component humidity and the component temperature using an Arrhenius-Peck equation as follows; A F = R 1 R 2 - 2.66 * [ e ^ ( ( E a K ) * 1 T 1 - 1 T 2 ) ] where AF is an acceleration factor, R1 is a baseline relative humidity, R2 is the component humidity, E, is a baseline activation energy, K is the Boltzmann's constant, T1, is a baseline temperature, and T2, is the component temperature; determining an estimated useful service life of the component based on the historical information of acceleration factors and modifying a speed of a fan configured to control airflow through the information handling system based on the acceleration factor when the estimated useful service life falls below a threshold value. Storino teaches determining, in real-time, an acceleration factor for the component based on the component humidity and the component temperature (para [0028] FIG. 2E shows a table that can be stored in nonvolatile memory, containing "instantaneous" acceleration factors, as computed from input from each of the sensors. Fig. 1 para [0035] The sensors in sensor group 112 can all be different, monitoring different environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, voltage, and thermal cycle information) the sensors collect the temperature and humidity of the component 100 and determine the acceleration factor in real time or instantaneously. using Arrehnius-peck model or equation in paragraphs [007] to [0013] (temperature-humidity acceleration factor) A F = R H t R h u n * [ e ^ ( ( E a K ) * 1 T u - 1 T t ) ] Where AF is temperature-humidity acceleration factor, RHt is a relative humidity of test (i.e., component), RHu is a nominal use relative humidity (i.e., baseline), Ea is activation energy, K Boltzmann’ constant, Tu is baseline temperature and Tt is component temperature. determining an estimated useful service life of the component based on the historical information of acceleration factors (para [0001] This invention relates to reliability of a product, and in particular to estimating the remaining lifetime of the product, using environmental and use condition history of the product, together with wearout, or aging, acceleration factors applicable to the environmental factors and use conditions.); Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the invention to have incorporated Storino into Asmussen for the purpose of accurate determination of acceleration factor of a component in an information handling system using an Arrhenius-peck equation and historical acceleration factors taught by Storino. The combination of Assmussen, Vichar, Webster and Storino do not teach modifying a speed of a fan configured to control airflow through the information handling system based on the acceleration factor when the estimated useful service life falls below a threshold value Benlarbi teaches modifying a speed of a fan configured to control airflow through the information handling system based on the acceleration factor when the estimated useful service life falls below a threshold value (para [0002] Electronic components are in general subject to at least two stresses, an electrical stress, with increasing tendency to breakdown due to voltage, current or power and a thermal stress due to its own power dissipation and, in part, to the total dissipation of neighboring components and/or the local environment. Reducing electrical and thermal stress leads to products improved failure rates and extended useful life. [0007] It is an object of the invention to provide an improved form of adaptive cooling adapted to a selectable reliability target or a selectable useful life target. [0009] In some embodiments the cooling unit is a fan and the setting is a fan speed setting and the system configuration information identifies an association between the cooling unit and at least one sub equipment location. Para [0010] This apparatus configuration information may be an association between a cooling unit setting and a threshold value reading for the sensors associated with the apparatus wherein the threshold value reading for the sensors is associated with a specific useful life target.) Here examiner views an adaptive (i.e., modifying) fan speed used for control of airflow through an equipment or apparatus (i.e., information handling system) based on the thermal stress (i.e., acceleration factor) for a selectable useful life target of the equipment (i.e., if the useful life is below a threshold due to a thermal stress the speed of the fan is modified to extend the service life of device). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the invention to have incorporated Benlarbi into Asmussen for the purpose of modifying a speed of a fan to control the airflow through the information handling system using the acceleration factor so that the system can be operated for a desired useful life target by reducing acceleration factors. Claims 10 and 16 are rejected as claim 1 having same claim limitations. Claim(s) 2 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Asmussen, Vichare, Webster, Storino and Benlarbi in view of Hamann et al. (US 20130265064 A1) herein after “Hamann” Regarding claim 2, the combination of Asmussen, Vichare Webster, Storino and Benlarbi teach the method of claim 1, however the combination does not teach further comprising: determining that a moisture level in a volume between a sensor measuring ambient humidity data and the component is unchanged, wherein the determination is made before determining the component humidity Hamann teaches determining that a moisture level in a volume between a sensor measuring ambient humidity data and the component is unchanged (para [0037] In a further embodiment, to maintain a constant relative humidity level within the device, the humidity sensor device 22 is controlled in real-time to achieve a set air moisture level) Herein the moisture level or humidity level within the structure (i.e., is viewed to be space between the sensor and a device or component) is maintained at a desired humidity level (i.e., constant or unchanged) , wherein the determination is made before determining the component humidity (para [0037] …A controller 32C receives real-time output sensor signals either via hard-wired or wireless communication from the humidity sensor device 22 and generates a feedback control signal 45 to activate a humidifier element 60 which may be a humidifier or like device to raise the moisture level in the ambient air to a desired set condition….). Examiner views after a desired (i.e., constant) set humidity, the humidity sensor device 22 measures the humidity of the component or within the structure 12. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the invention to have incorporated Hamann into Asmussen for the purpose of determining a humidity level between a structure and a humidity senor and adjust the humidity level by measuring the humidity level by the humidity sensor. Claim 11 is rejected as claim 2 above having same claim limitation/element. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Cercueil et al. (US 20130231872 A1) discusses method and device for monitoring ageing of electric equipment. Hershey et al. (US 20020161457 A1) discusses estimating time To Failure Acceleration Factor. Campbell et al. (US 20110290448 A1) discusses cooling of an electronics rack(s) of a data center, including rack-mounted assemblages of individual electronics units, such as rack mounted computer server units. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHARAD TIMILSINA whose telephone number is (571)272-7104. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Catherine Rastovski can be reached at 571-270-0349. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARAD TIMILSINA/Examiner, Art Unit 2857 /Catherine T. Rastovski/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2857
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 13 earlier events
May 01, 2026
Interview Requested
May 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 12, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 31, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704626
INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES FOR MICROMACHINED pMUT ARRAYS AND ELECTRONICS USING SOLID LIQUID INTERDIFFUSION (SLID)
5y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681097
A METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE ASSOCIATION OF A SENSOR DEVICE WITH AN ELECTRIC BATTERY UNIT
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663559
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EVALUATING PARAMETERS CHARACTERIZING ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663473
METHOD FOR EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF BATTERY PARAMETERS AND THEIR USE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12644482
FASTENER ASSEMBLY SENSOR UNIT
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 161 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month