Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/971,625

CAMERA MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 23, 2022
Examiner
LIU, SHAN
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sharp Sensing Technology Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
436 granted / 606 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
59.5%
+19.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 606 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Pages 4-5, filed 07/08/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-3 and 5-6 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejections previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed 04/08/2025 has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejections for claims 1-3 and 5-6 are made as stated below. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang (US2024/0210665) in view of Watanabe (US 2011/0182566) and Hirata (JP2016224388A) Regarding claim 1, Zhang teaches a camera module (Fig. 1-40, Abs, [0006-0208]) comprising: a first lens group (G1 in Fig. 2-4), including two or more lenses (Fig. 2-4), having a positive power as a whole (Abs, [0006, 0094]), and being configured to receive object light (Fig. 1-4 and 40); a second lens group (G2 in Fig. 2-4) including one or more lenses (Fig. 2-4), having a negative power as a whole (Abs, [0006, 0094]), and disposed in a traveling direction of the object light (Fig. 1-4 and 40) with respect to the first lens group (G1 in Fig. 2-4) to concentrate the object light (Fig. 1-4 and 40, Abs, [0093-0094, 0101]); and a lens driver (Fig. 5A-5B, the inherent driver to move G2 in Fig. 2-3, [0098, 0105]) to move (Fig. 3) the second lens group (G2 in Fig. 2-4). Zhang does not teach that a first lens barrel holding the first lens group; a second lens barrel holding the second lens group, a lens driver holding a perimeter of the second lens barrel to move the second lens group, in a direction along a first optical axis of the second lens group, wherein a size of the lens driver in a direction intersecting with the first optical axis is smaller than a size of the first lens barrel in the direction intersecting with the first optical axis, a case housing the first lens barrel, one of the first lens barrel and the case is provided with a protrusion structure protruding in a diameter direction of the first lens barrel, and another one of the first lens barrel and the case is provided with a guidance structure for the protrusion structure. Watanabe teaches that (Fig. 1-4 and 7-8, [0157-0170, 0205]) a first lens barrel (10 in Fig. 2-4, [0159]) holding a first lens group (the lens group corresponding to G1 in Fig. 2-4); a second lens barrel (110a in Fig. 3 and Fig. 7, [0173, 0178]) holding a second lens group (the lens group corresponding to G3, G4 and/or G5 in Fig. 4), a lens driver (the driver corresponding to 130/132, 140/142, 105, 106 and 70 in Fig. 2-3, [0168, 0205]) holding a perimeter of the second lens barrel (110 in Fig. 3, [0169]) to move the second lens group (the lens group corresponding to G3, G4 and/or G5 in Fig. 4), in a direction along a first optical axis (L2 in Fig. 3) of the second lens group (the lens group corresponding to G3, G4 and/or G5 in Fig. 4), wherein a size of the lens driver (the driver corresponding to 130/132, 140/142, 105, 106 and 70 in Fig. 2-3, [0168, 0205]) in a direction (the vertical direction in Fig. 3) intersecting with the first optical axis (L2 in Fig. 3) is smaller than (Fig. 2-3) a size of the first lens barrel (10 in Fig. 2-4, [0159]) in the direction (the vertical direction in Fig. 3) intersecting with the first optical axis (L2 in Fig. 3). Before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to the artisan of ordinary skill to employ the above elements as taught by Watanabe for the system of Zhang such that in the system of Zhang, a first lens barrel holding the first lens group; a second lens barrel holding the second lens group, a lens driver holding a perimeter of the second lens barrel to move the second lens group, in a direction along a first optical axis of the second lens group, wherein a size of the lens driver in a direction intersecting with the first optical axis is smaller than a size of the first lens barrel in the direction intersecting with the first optical axis. The motivation is to provide an optical system with simplification of the structure or a reduction in size and thickness of the device (Watanabe, [0013, 0019, 0043]). Hirata teaches that (Fig. 1-2, Pages 2-4 of English translation of JP2016224388A) a case (17 in Fig. 1-2) housing a first lens barrel (the lens barrel 1 in Fig. 1-7), one of the first lens barrel (the lens barrel 1 in Fig. 1-7) and the case (17 in Fig. 1-2) is provided with a protrusion structure (the protrusion of lens barrel 1 corresponding to 1c in Fig. 1-2) protruding in a diameter direction (Fig. 1-2) of the first lens barrel (the lens barrel 1 in Fig. 1-7), and another one of the first lens barrel (the lens barrel 1 in Fig. 1-7) and the case (17 in Fig. 1-2) is provided with a guidance structure (the end portion of 17 contact 1c in Fig. 1-2) for the protrusion structure (the protrusion of lens barrel 1 corresponding to 1c in Fig. 1-2) Before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to the artisan of ordinary skill to employ the above elements as taught by Hirata for the system of Zhang in view of Watanabe such that in the system of Zhang in view of Watanabe, a case housing the first lens barrel, one of the first lens barrel and the case is provided with a protrusion structure protruding in a diameter direction of the first lens barrel, and another one of the first lens barrel and the case is provided with a guidance structure for the protrusion structure. The motivation is to provide a lens unit that can prevent lenses supported by a lens barrel from moving due to a temperature change (Hirata, Abs). Regarding claims 2-3 and 5-6, Zhang teaches that an image pickup unit (20 in Fig. 2-4, [0101]) to which the object light converges (Fig. 2-4, [0101]), wherein a position of the first lens group (G1 in Fig. 2-4) with respect to the image pickup unit (20 in Fig. 2-4, [0101]) is fixed (Fig. 2-3, Abs, [0006, 0094]). Zhang does not teach the following elements. Watanabe teaches the following elements (Fig. 1-4 and 7-8, [0157-0170, 0205]): (Claim 2) the lens driver (the driver corresponding to 130/132, 140/142, 105, 106 and 70 in Fig. 2-3, [0168, 0205]) is incorporated in the first lens barrel (10 in Fig. 2-4, [0159]). (Claim 3) a position of a first lens barrel (10 in Fig. 2-4, [0159]) with respect to an image pickup unit (50 in Fig. 3, [0158]) is fixed (Fig. 3). (Claim 5) the lens driver (the driver corresponding to 130/132, 140/142, 105, 106 and 70 in Fig. 2-3, [0168, 0205]) has a movable part (the part corresponding to 130/132, 140/142, 105, 106 in Fig. 2-3) configured to move a second lens group (the lens group corresponding to G3, G4 and/or G5 in Fig. 4) in the direction along the first optical axis (L2 in Fig. 3), and a fixed part (the part corresponding to 70 in Fig. 2-3) that does not change position (Fig. 2-3) when the second lens group (the lens group corresponding to G3, G4 and/or G5 in Fig. 4) undergoes movement, and a size of the fixed part (the part corresponding to 70 in Fig. 2-3) in the direction (the vertical direction in Fig. 3) intersecting with the first optical axis (L2 in Fig. 3) is smaller than (Fig. 2-3) a size of the first lens barrel in the direction (the vertical direction in Fig. 3) intersecting with the first optical axis (L2 in Fig. 3) Before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to the artisan of ordinary skill to employ the above elements as taught by Watanabe for the system of Zhang in view of Watanabe such that in the system of Zhang in view of Watanabe, (Claim 2) the lens driver is incorporated in the first lens barrel. (Claim 3) a position of the first lens barrel with respect to the image pickup unit is fixed. (Claim 5) the lens driver has a movable part configured to move the second lens group in the direction along the first optical axis, and a fixed part that does not change position when the second lens group undergoes movement, and a size of the fixed part in the direction intersecting with the first optical axis is smaller than a size of the first lens barrel in the direction intersecting with the first optical axis. The motivation is to provide an optical system with simplification of the structure or a reduction in size and thickness of the device (Watanabe, [0013, 0019, 0043]). Regarding claim 6, Zhang also teaches the following elements: (Claim 6) a reflective element (Fig. 40, [0206]) disposed in a direction opposite to the traveling direction of the object light (Fig. 40) with respect to the first lens group (the first lens group of 301 in Fig. 40, which is corresponding to G1 in Fig. 2-4), wherein the reflective element (Fig. 40, [0206]) guides, along the first optical axis (the axis of 301 corresponding to the horizontal direction in Fig. 40), the object light emitted along a second optical axis (the axis corresponding to the vertical direction in Fig. 40) intersecting with the first optical axis (the axis of 301 corresponding to the horizontal direction in Fig. 40), and the first lens group (the first lens group of 301 in Fig. 40, which is corresponding to G1 in Fig. 2-4) and the second lens group (the second lens group of 301 in Fig. 40, which is corresponding to G2 in Fig. 2-4) concentrate the object light along the first optical axis (the axis of 301 corresponding to the horizontal direction in Fig. 40). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kinouchi (US 2019/0179108, at least Fig. 2-3) a case (the case corresponding to 212, or the combination of 212, 211 and 205 in Fig. 3) housing the first lens barrel (220 in Fig. 2-3, [0037]), wherein a size of the lens driver (the driver corresponding to 270 in Fig. 3) in a direction (the vertical direction in Fig. 3) intersecting with the first optical axis (OA in Fig. 3) is smaller than (Fig. 3) a size of the first lens barrel (220 in Fig. 2-3, [0037]) in the direction intersecting with the first optical axis (Fig. 3); one of the first lens barrel (220 in Fig. 2-3, [0037]) and the case (the case corresponding to 212, or the combination of 212, 211 and 205 in Fig. 3) is provided with a protrusion structure (221a in Fig. 2-3) protruding in a diameter direction (Fig. 2-3) of the first lens barrel (220 in Fig. 2-3, [0037]), and another one of the first lens barrel (220 in Fig. 2-3, [0037]) and the case (the case corresponding to 212, or the combination of 212, 211 and 205 in Fig. 3) is provided with a guidance structure (212a in Fig. 2-3) for the protrusion structure (221a in Fig. 2-3). PNG media_image1.png 564 414 media_image1.png Greyscale Ozaki (US 2010/0067129, at least Fig. 1) teaches that a case (11 in Fig. 1) housing a lens barrel (36 in Fig. 1), one of the lens barrel (36 in Fig. 1) and the case (11 in Fig. 1) is provided with a protrusion structure (the bottom protrusion of 36 in Fig. 1) protruding in a diameter direction (Fig. 2-3) of the lens barrel (36 in Fig. 1), and another one of the first lens barrel and the case is provided with a guidance structure (the groove of 11 for the bottom protrusion of 36 in Fig. 1) for the protrusion structure (Fig. 1). PNG media_image2.png 250 468 media_image2.png Greyscale Hwang (US 2023/0075967, at least Fig. 4) teaches that a case (the case corresponding to C1 in Picture 1) housing a first lens barrel (1230 in Picture 1), one of the first lens barrel (1230 in Picture 1) and the case (C1 in Picture 1) is provided with a protrusion structure (P1 in Picture 1) protruding in a diameter direction (Fig. 4) of the first lens barrel (1230 in Picture 1), and another one of the first lens barrel and the case is provided with a guidance structure (G1 in Picture 1) for the protrusion structure (P1 in Picture 1). PNG media_image3.png 304 418 media_image3.png Greyscale Picture 1, from Fig. 4 of Hwang (US 2023/0075967) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAN LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-0383. The examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached on 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Shan Liu/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 08, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596033
LIGHT SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591114
OPTICAL LENS ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578588
LENS DRIVING APPARATUS AND CAMERA MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560837
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND VIRTUAL REALITY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560822
LIQUID CRYSTAL PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.4%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 606 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month