Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 17/971,871

CONTROLLED RELEASE OF A THERAPEUTIC FROM AN OPHTHALMIC DEVICE WITH A LOCALLY ENHANCED CONCENTRATION OF CHLORIDE IONS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 24, 2022
Priority
Oct 28, 2021 — provisional 63/272,732
Examiner
SU, SUSAN SHAN
Art Unit
3700
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Verily Life Sciences LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
824 granted / 1145 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1173
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1145 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-20 are pending, of which Claims 14-15 & 17 are amended. All claims are examined on the merits. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 7/21/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Gutierrez (US 2019/0380871). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17 recites the limitation "wherein dissolving the boost layer further comprises…" There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because Claim 10, from which Claim 17 depends, merely mentions a boost layer being present but does not mention dissolving the boost layer. Examiner believes that Claim 17 should depend from Claim 11 to have proper antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 8-9, 15, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gutierrez (US 2019/0380871). Re Claim 1, Gutierrez discloses an ophthalmic device comprising: a reservoir (e.g., 118a or 118b, see [0050]) having an interior configured to hold a therapeutic ([0050]); a metal electrode (thin film seal 119a or 119b) configured to cover an opening of the reservoir ([0050] “a plurality of controllable thin film seals 119a, 119b positioned over the reservoirs 118a, 118b”) and to receive an electrical signal that electrodissolves the metal electrode to release the therapeutic from the reservoir ([0051] “the processor 114 is configured to cause each of the seals 119a, 119b to undergo electrodissolution by applying a voltage to the thin film seals 119a, 119b); and a body (flexible coating 117) comprising a hydrogel-based material ([0040]) configured to encapsulate the reservoir and the metal electrode ([0040] & FIG. 6B), wherein electrodissolution is enhanced by chloride ions ([0052] “The metallic film undergoes electrodissolution when a potential is applied in presence of chloride-containing solutions (e.g., tear film).”). Re Claim 2, Gutierrez discloses claim 1, wherein the hydrogel-based material is permeable to the chloride ions ([0043] of Gutierrez discloses the same materials as those found in [0039] of the current Application’s Specification; therefore the reference’s hydrogel-based material must also be permeable to chloride ions). Re Claim 8, Gutierrez discloses a method comprising: positioning an ophthalmic device on an eye of a subject, wherein the ophthalmic device comprises: a reservoir (118a, 118b) having an interior configured to hold a therapeutic; a metal electrode (119a, 119b) configured to cover an opening of the reservoir and to electrodissolve to release the therapeutic from the reservoir (e.g., [0050]); and a body (117) comprising a hydrogel-based material ([0040]) configured to encapsulate the reservoir and the metal electrode; and applying an electrical signal ([0052]) to the electrode so that the electrode undergoes electrodissolution to release the therapeutic, wherein the electrodissolution is enhanced by chloride ions ([0052]). Re Claim 9, Gutierrez discloses claim 8, wherein the hydrogel-based material is permeable to the chloride ions ([0043] of Gutierrez discloses the same materials as those found in the current Application). Re Claim 15, Gutierrez discloses claim 8 and further discloses: applying an electrical signal ([0052]) to the metal electrode to begin electrodissolution; dissolving ([0051]-[0052]) the metal electrode by electrodissolution; and releasing the therapeutic from the reservoir ([0051]) to diffuse across the hydrogel body into the eye. Re Claim 18, Gutierrez discloses claim 8 and also implies that wherein the applying electrical signal further comprises starting the electrodissolution once a charge transfer limit is reached ([0053] discloses holding the anode potential at a particular voltage to enable gold dissolution, thus implying that once the right conditions are met, such as reaching a particular voltage, electrodissolution will naturally start). Re Claim 19, Gutierrez discloses claim 8 and also discloses treating an eye disease with the therapeutic (e.g., Abstract). Re Claim 20, Guterrez discloses claim 19 and also disclosing wherein the eye disease is one of glaucoma (e.g., Abstract) and dry eye. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7, 10-14, 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 17 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Re Claims 3, 10 & 16, no prior art is found to disclose placing a boost layer next to a metal electrode that gates a drug reservoir, wherein the boost layer is configured to supply the chloride ions to enhance the electrodissolution. Claims 4-7 and 11-14, 17 are allowable at least for being dependent from Claim 3 or 10. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 5,797,898 discloses a microchip drug delivery device where the drug reservoirs on the chip are capped by gold that can electrodissolve upon application of an electric potential. WO 97/11744 discloses an iontophoretic device wherein the anode is substantially copper and the cathode is silver-coated carbon, and both the anode and cathode are in an electrolyte solution. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUSAN S SU whose telephone number is (408)918-7575. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 - 5:00 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rebecca Eisenberg can be reached at 571-270-5879. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUSAN S SU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3781 25 September 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jul 09, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 09, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 21, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766301
INFUSION SITE OF A BLOOD TUBING SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766051
DURABLE UNDERWEAR ADAPTED FOR USE WITH ABSORBENT COMPONENT
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12740852
STENT WITH ANTI-MIGRATION FEATURES
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734062
OSTOMY FILTER
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734079
PATTERNED APERTURED NONWOVEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+23.7%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month