Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/972,493

MEMORY DEVICE HAVING CACHE STORING CACHE DATA AND SCRUB DATA

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 24, 2022
Examiner
TALUKDAR, ARVIND
Art Unit
2132
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Micron Technology, Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
449 granted / 557 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
593
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 557 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 3, 5-20 are pending. Claims 2, 4 are cancelled. Priority: October 24, 2022 Assignee: Micron Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim(s) 1, 13 and 20 recite the following limitations that contain insufficient antecedent basis or are otherwise unclear. Claim 1: in response to receiving a first read command requesting a second data set, determine that [first] the second data set is not stored in the cache, and read the [first] the second data set from a memory array; in response to determining that [second data] the second data set read from the memory array has an error, correct the second data set, store the corrected second data set in the cache, and set a flag for the second data set; and in response to receiving a second read command requesting the second data set, determine that the second data set is stored in the cache, determine the flag is set, write the corrected second data set from the cache to the memory array, and read the corrected second data set from the cache. Claim 13: An apparatus comprising: a cache; and a controller configured to: determine that a first data set read from a memory array has an error, correct the first data set, store the corrected first data set in the cache, and set a scrub flag for the first data set; receive a read command from a host device, the read command requesting the first data set; in response to receiving the read command, determine the first data set is stored in the cache and that the scrub flag for the first data set is set; in response to determining that the scrub flag is set, write back the corrected first data from the cache to the memory array; read the corrected first data set from the cache; and send the corrected first data set to the host device. Claim 17: A method comprising: in response to determining that a first data set read from a memory array has an error, correcting the first data set; storing the corrected first data set in a scrub area of a cache memory; receiving a request to read the first data set; in response to determining that the first data is stored in the scrub area, writing back the corrected first data set from the scrub area to the memory array; and providing the corrected first data set from the scrub area in reply to the request. Regarding the dependent claims All instances of “the first/second/third read command” should be appended with “requesting the first/second/third data set”. All instances of “second/third data” should be replaced with “the second/third data set”, with the exception of the very first instance which should should have the indefinite article “a” instead of “the”. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 1, 3, 5-20 contain allowable subject matter based on the prior art. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance. Claim(s) 1, 13 and 17 each contain the following limitations that distinguish the claims from the prior art: “…and in response to receiving a second read command, determine that second data is stored in the cache, determine a flag is set indicating the second data needs correction, write the second data from the cache to the memory array, and read the second data from the cache…”(Claim 1); “…in response to receiving the read command, determine the first data is stored in the cache and that a scrub flag for the first data is set;in response to determining that the scrub flag is set, write back the first data, and read the first data from the cache; and send the first data to the host device…”(claim 13). “…in response to determining that the first data is not stored in either of the scrub area or the cache area, writing back the first data, providing the first data from the scrub area in reply to the request.…”(claim 17). A relevant prior art is Anantaraman et al.(20160350237) where the electronic device has a cache memory communicatively coupled to processor. A controller is communicatively coupled to the cache memory and has logic, partially including hardware logic, to receive a first transaction to operate on a first data element in the cache memory. A lookup operation is performed for the first data element in the volatile memory. A cache scrub hint is generated, the cache scrub hint is forwarded to a cache scrub engine and cache lines are identified to scrub based in portion on the cache scrub hint, in response to a failed lookup operation. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Regarding claims 1, 3, 5-20, the previous grounds for the 112(b) have been dropped. However new grounds for a 112(b) have been entered based on insufficient antecedent basis, and additional clarity issues. Please see the rejection(s) above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARVIND TALUKDAR whose telephone number is (303)297-4475. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 10 am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hosain Alam can be reached at 571-272-3978. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Arvind Talukdar Primary Examiner Art Unit 2132 /ARVIND TALUKDAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2132
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2022
Application Filed
May 16, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 19, 2024
Response Filed
Nov 16, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 17, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602317
MEMORY DEVICE HARDWARE HOST READ ACTIONS BASED ON LOOKUP OPERATION RESULTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591520
LINEAR TO PHYSICAL ADDRESS TRANSLATION WITH SUPPORT FOR PAGE ATTRIBUTES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591382
STORAGE DEVICE OPERATION ORCHESTRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12579074
HARDWARE PROCESSOR CORE HAVING A MEMORY SLICED BY LINEAR ADDRESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566712
A RING BUFFER WITH MULTIPLE HEAD POINTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+3.5%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 557 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month