Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/973,713

PRISMATIC BATTERY CELL

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 26, 2022
Priority
Nov 11, 2021 — DE 102021129321.9
Examiner
GREENE, PATRICK MARSHALL
Art Unit
1724
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Audi AG
OA Round
4 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
119 granted / 169 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
65.4%
+25.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 169 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/27/26 has been entered. Response to Arguments The following is in response to the applicant’s remarks filed 01/27/26 The applicant argues that the amendments which incorporate the limitations of dependent claim 9 into 1 overcome the previous rejection. Specifically, the applicant argues that Kim does not teach the limitations of a second terminal arranged on a second terminating element which sealingly encloses a second insertion opening of the cell housing on second side. The examiner respectfully disagrees as Kim teaches a cylindrical cell comprising a first and second terminal (positive and negative terminals)[0047][0043] on a first and second terminating element (top (20) and bottom (not shown) covers of casing)[0043][fig. 2A] disposed on a first (top (14)) and second (bottom (not shown)) side of a case (10) wherein both sides of the housing are sealed circumferentially (inherently circumferentially shaped given the cylindrical shape of the case)[0005][0041][0043]. The examiner acknowledges that Kim does not give a detailed description of the exact structures of the bottom side of the battery housing. However, the claimed features that are not explicitly described (bottom terminating element and circumferential sealing structure) are inherently present as they are necessary for the battery to function (ie. sealed and electrically conductive). Then, given the broadest reasonable interpretation of the general and broadly disclosed claimed structures, the implied structures of Kim are sufficient in teaching the claimed limitations. Therefore, the rejection is maintained. Additionally, while not being relied upon in the rejection below, Park, US20220131216A1, will be discussed as an evidentiary reference establishing known structures in the art. Park teaches a cylindrical battery cell (100) comprising a case (140) comprising a top and bottom opening (openings covered by cap (150) and lower plate (142))[fig. 1] wherein the top and bottom openings comprise terminating elements (collecting plates (120)(130))[fig. 2] which the first and second terminals (exterior electrical connection points (151)(142)) are arranged on (electrically connected)[fig. 1]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 7 and 10 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)(a)(2) as anticipated by Kim, US20110294002A1. Regarding claim 1, Kim teaches a prismatic battery cell (secondary battery)[0002], comprising: a cell housing (case body (10))[fig. 2A] and several electrodes arranged in an interior of the cell housing (electrode assembly)[0026] some of which are electrically connected to a first cell terminal accessible from outside the cell housing, and some to a second cell terminal also accessible from outside the cell housing (positive terminal (40) and negative terminal (not shown))[0043][fig. 2A], wherein the first cell terminal is arranged on a first side of the cell housing and the second cell terminal is arranged on a second side of the cell housing opposite the first side [0043][fig, 2A], wherein one of the cell terminals is arranged on a terminating element which is materially connected to the cell housing and which closes an insertion opening configured in the cell housing (cap plate (20) welded to case body (10))[0041][fig. 2B], and wherein the terminating element (cap plate (20)) is sealingly connected to the cell housing (case body (10)) via a circumferential sealing (sealing member (50)) in order to sealingly close the insertion opening in relation to an external environment of the battery cell (seals battery housing)[0054][fig. 2B] wherein the cell housing (10) has a terminating element receptacle (stepped portion (16)) which is encompassed by a circumferential step formed on the cell housing [fig. 2A], wherein the terminating element (20) rests on the step (16) or is supported on the step via the sealing [fig. 2B] wherein another one of the cell terminals (negative terminal (not shown))[0043] is arranged on a further terminating element (inherent structure) which is materially connected to the cell housing and which closes a further insertion opening (bottom (not shown)) side of a case (10) configured in the cell housing, (case body (10)) wherein the further terminating element (inherent structure) is sealingly connected to the cell housing via a further circumferential (inherently circumferential) sealing in order to tightly close the further insertion opening in relation to the external environment of the battery cell (case is sealed) [0005][0041][0043]. Regarding claim 2, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 1, wherein the material connection of the terminating element to the cell housing is present along a circumferential connecting seam (weld performed around the boundary of cap and case)[0053]. Regarding claim 3, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 2, wherein the connecting seam is present as a weld seam (weld)[0053] Regarding claim 4, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 2, wherein the connecting seam is arranged on a side of the sealing facing the external environment along an imaginary flow path between the external environment and the interior (weld on outside)[fig. 2B]. Regarding claim 5, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 2, wherein the sealing is arranged at a distance from the connecting seam (sealing member (50) and weld inherently posses a distance between one another)[fig. 2AB] Regarding claim 6, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 1, wherein the sealing is inserted into a sealing receptacle which is configured in the terminating element or the cell housing (seal (50) formed in groove (23))[fig. 4A]. Regarding claim 7, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 1, wherein the sealing is integrally configured with the terminating element or the cell housing (seal being a weld)[0053]. Regarding claim 10, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 1, wherein the cell housing (10) is configured as a hollow cylinder (cylindrical)[0045] and has the insertion opening on the first side (top opening (14))[fig. 2A] and the further insertion opening on the second side (bottom opening (not shown))[0043]. Regarding claim 11, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 3, wherein the connecting seam is arranged on a side of the sealing facing the external environment along an imaginary flow path between the external environment and the interior (weld on the outside)[fig. 1]. Regarding claim 12, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 3, wherein the sealing is arranged at a distance from the connecting seam (sealing member (50) and weld inherently possess a distance between one another)[fig. 2AB]. Regarding claim 13, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 4, wherein the sealing is arranged at a distance from the connecting seam (sealing member (50) and weld inherently possess a distance between one another)[fig. 2AB]. Regarding claim 14, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 2, wherein the sealing is inserted into a sealing receptacle which is configured in the terminating element or the cell housing (seal (50) formed in groove (23))[fig. 4A]. Regarding claim 15, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 3, wherein the sealing is inserted into a sealing receptacle which is configured in the terminating element or the cell housing (seal (50) formed in groove (23))[fig. 4A].. Regarding claim 16, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 4, wherein the sealing is inserted into a sealing receptacle which is configured in the terminating element or the cell housing (seal (50) formed in groove (23))[fig. 4A]. Regarding claim 17, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 5, wherein the sealing is inserted into a sealing receptacle which is configured in the terminating element or the cell housing (seal (50) formed in groove (23))[fig. 4A]. Regarding claim 18, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 2, wherein the sealing is integrally configured with the terminating element or the cell housing (seal being a weld)[0053]. Regarding claim 19, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 3, wherein the sealing is integrally configured with the terminating element or the cell housing (seal being a weld)[0053]. Regarding claim 20, Kim teaches the prismatic battery cell according to claim 4, wherein the sealing is integrally configured with the terminating element or the cell housing (seal being a weld)[0053]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK M GREENE whose telephone number is (571)270-1340. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at (571)270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK MARSHALL GREENE/Examiner, Art Unit 1724 /STEWART A FRASER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 07, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 03, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12725782
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719065
SEPARATOR INTEGRATED WITH GASKET FOR FUEL CELL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12665216
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12633631
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620630
ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
4y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+25.0%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 169 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month