Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/977,939

SOLID-STATE OPTICAL STORAGE DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 31, 2022
Examiner
PEACE, RHONDA S
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Orca Computing Limited
OA Round
3 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
1039 granted / 1219 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1257
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1219 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-9, filed 11/6/25, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 12-20 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by Ishizaka (US 2015/0063801 A1), have been fully considered and are unpersuasive. The claimed terms “layer” and “coplanar” are broad in the art, so as to refer to a commonly bounded space. For example, the cladding 3 of Figure 3 in Ishizaka bounds a region of space considered to be a “layer” or “plane” so as to define a common layer or plane for optical input, optical output, and floating gate waveguide. The same is consistent with the ordinary meaning of the claims, as the claims fail to specifically define the boundaries of the claimed layer or plane. For these reasons, the rejection is maintained. This Action is FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 12-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ishizaka (US 2015/0063801 A1). Re. Claim 12, Ishizaka discloses a nonvolatile memory for a photonic circuit ([0019]-[0020]), the nonvolatile memory comprising: a layer comprising: an optical input 12/13 (Fig. 3; [0031]); an optical output 9/10 (Fig. 3; [0031]); a floating gate waveguide 5/11 (Figs. 1-3; [0031], [0034]); a control gate 6/7 (Figs. 1-3; [0031]); a source gate 14 (Figs. 1-3; [0031]); a first isolation coupler optically coupling the optical input 12/13 to the floating gate waveguide 5/11, the first isolation coupler conductively decoupling the floating gate waveguide 5/11 from the optical input 12/13 (Fig. 2; [0033]); and a second isolation coupler optically coupling the floating gate waveguide 12/13 to the optical output 9/10, the second isolation coupler conductively decoupling the floating gate waveguide 5/11 from the optical input 12/13 (Fig. 2; [0033]); wherein the floating gate waveguide 5/11 is configured to accumulate and retain electrical charge supplied by the source gate 14 in response to a voltage applied to the control gate 6/7 (Fig. 2; [0034]-[0035]). Re. Claim 13, Ishizaka discloses the floating gate waveguide 5/11 is a portion of an interferometer or a resonator (Figs. 3-4; [0030]-[0031], [0042]). Re. Claim 14, Ishizaka discloses accumulated charge in the floating gate waveguide influences a behavior of the interferometer or the resonator ([0039]), [0045]). Re. Claim 15, Ishizaka discloses the first isolation coupler comprises a gap (Fig. 2; [0034]). Re. Claim 16, Ishizaka discloses the second isolation coupler comprises a tapered gap (Figs. 3-4). Re. Claim 17, Ishizaka discloses the floating gate waveguide 5/11 is formed from a semiconductor ([0031]). Re. Claim 18, Ishizaka discloses nonvolatile memory for a photonic circuit ([0019]-[0020]), the nonvolatile memory comprising: a floating gate waveguide 5/11 (Figs. 1-3; [0031], [0034]); a control gate 6/7 (Figs. 1-3; [0031]); a source gate 14 (Figs. 1-3; [0031]); a first isolation coupler conductively isolating the floating gate waveguide 5/11 from the control gate 6/7 and the source gate 14 (Fig. 2; [0033]); and a second isolation coupler conductively isolating the floating gate waveguide 5/11 from the control gate 6/7 and the source gate 14 (Fig. 2; [0033]); wherein the floating gate waveguide 5/11 is configured to accumulate and retain electrical charge supplied by the source gate 14 in response to a voltage applied to the control gate 6/7 (Fig. 2; [0034]-[0035]). Re. Claim 19, Ishizaka discloses the floating gate waveguide 5/11 is formed from a semiconductor material ([0031]). Re. Claim 20, Ishizaka discloses the floating gate waveguide 5/11 is optically coupled to a photonic circuit ([0020]). Re. Claim 21, Ishizaka discloses the optical input 12/13, optical output 9/10, and floating gate waveguide 5/11 are coplanar with one another (Fig. 3). For example, all elements are contained within the plane defined by layer 3. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to R. PEACE whose telephone number is (571)272-8580. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at (571) 272-2397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RHONDA S PEACE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874 12/15/25
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 29, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 06, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601880
OPTICAL CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596286
OPTICAL PHASE MODULATOR, OPTICAL DEVICE, AND OPTICAL COMPUTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585067
CABLE MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578618
Optical Sources
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566291
SURFACE MOUNT TYPE OPTICAL MODULE AND ATTACHMENT/DETACHMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1219 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month