Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/978,962

3D Spatial Mapping in a 3D Coordinate System of an AR Headset Using 2D Images

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 01, 2022
Examiner
THOMPSON, JAMES A
Art Unit
2615
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Novarad Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
617 granted / 723 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
732
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
85.3%
+45.3% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 723 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 3. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2 January 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments 4. Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 2 January 2026, with respect to the rejections of claims 1-5 and 39-41 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejections have been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, new grounds of rejection are made in view of newly-applied prior art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claims 1-5 and 39-41 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gibby (US-2020/0159313 – cited in IDS of 7/12/2023). Regarding claim 1: Gibby discloses a method, comprising: receiving 2D image data of patient anatomy from a medical imaging device (fig 1, fig 6, [0023]-[0025], and [0051] of Gibby – 2D image data captured for use by medical professional with AR headset); identifying a location of the 2D image data in a 3D coordinate system of an augmented reality (AR) headset (fig 1, fig 2, [0024]-[0027], and [0030] of Gibby – location of 2D image data in the 3D coordinate system is identified based on features, such as the optical code 200 and markers 206, so the medical professional can properly operate using the AR headset); receiving a graphical mark from a user for a point within the 2D image data (fig 2(200,206) and [0031]-[0032] of Gibby); and computing a 3D coordinate of the point in the 3D coordinate system using a location of the medical imaging device with respect to the AR headset to generate a 3D spatial mapping and target a structure in a person (fig 4, figs 6-7, [0047], [0051], and [0058]-[0062] of Gibby – location and orientation of medical imaging device used to reconstruct the 3D image data set for the AR display), wherein the medical imaging device captured the 2D image data (fig 6, fig 7, fig 8A, [0051], [0059], and [0068] of Gibby). Regarding claim 2: Gibby discloses the method as in claim 1 (as rejected above), further comprising displaying 2D image data while viewing patient anatomy through an augmented reality (AR) headset (fig 1(114) and [0024]-[0025] of Gibby). Regarding claim 3: Gibby discloses the method as in claim 1 (as rejected above), further comprising displaying a procedure guidance indicator for a medical tool or augmentation tag identified by the AR headset to the 3D coordinate of the point (fig 3, fig 4(400,402,404), [0040]-[0041], and [0046]-[0047] of Gibby). Regarding claim 4: Gibby discloses the method as in claim 1 (as rejected above), wherein the 2D image data is an ultrasound image (fig 8B and [0071]-[0072] of Gibby). Regarding claim 5: Gibby discloses the method as in claim 1 (as rejected above), wherein the medical imaging device has an optical marker on a surface of the medical imaging device to identify a placement of the medical imaging device and provide 3D coordinates of the 2D image data (figs 6-7(652,658), [0055], and [0059] of Gibby). Regarding claim 39: Gibby discloses the method as in claim 1 (as rejected above), wherein the location of the medical imaging device further comprises a position and orientation of the medical imaging device (figs 6-7, [0055], and [0059]-[0060] of Gibby). Regarding claim 40: Gibby discloses the method as in claim 1 (as rejected above), further comprising displaying 2D images from the medical imaging device while viewing patient anatomy using an augmented reality (AR) headset, in order to generate a 3D spatial mapping (fig 1 and [0027]-[0028] of Gibby). Regarding claim 41: Gibby discloses the method as in claim 1 (as rejected above), further comprising providing a navigation path from a medical tool identified by the AR headset to the point (fig 4(404) and [0047] of Gibby). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James A Thompson whose telephone number is (571)272-7441. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Harrington can be reached at 571-272-2330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Nov 08, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 08, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 11, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12626412
ADAPTIVE GEOMETRY FILTERING FOR MESH COMPRESSION
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620063
IMAGE GENERATION DEVICE, AUTONOMOUS CLEANER AND IMAGE GENERATION METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12614315
ATTRIBUTE CODING FOR POINT CLOUD COMPRESSION
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614352
MULTI-CAMERA HIGH SPEED SIMULTANEOUS LOCALIZATION AND MAPPING (SLAM) FOR A HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY
11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12602893
VOLUMETRIC HEAT MAPS FOR INTELLIGENTLY DISTRIBUTING VIRTUAL OBJECTS OF INTEREST
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.0%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 723 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month