Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 17/980,920

MEMORY EXPANSION WITH PERSISTENT PREDICTIVE PREFETCHING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 04, 2022
Examiner
VERBRUGGE, KEVIN
Art Unit
2132
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
505 granted / 570 resolved
+33.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
584
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 570 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 14 depends from claim 9 and calls claim 9 a “computer system,” however, claim 9 is a “memory device” claim. Perhaps claim 14 should depend from claim 13? Or from claim 11? Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 11, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by PCT published application WO 95/01600 to DORNIER. DORNIER shows the claimed memory device in Fig. 1. He shows the claimed nonvolatile memory to store data as disk drive 11. He shows the claimed volatile memory to cache data from the nonvolatile memory as system RAM 17. DORNIER’s device performs the claimed steps, namely: --Receiving an access request (from the CPU 13) --Storing an access history (sequence table 23) --Computing a prediction and causing storing of the predicted data in the volatile memory (“On start-up, the predictive disk cache system loads ahead…” abstract), and --Storing the prediction in nonvolatile memory (sequence table 25). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10, 12-15, and 17-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The details of the dependent claims (local tables, global tables, page index and offset values within the tables, and confidence values) are not found in the prior art in combination with the limitations of the independent claims. Note It is noted that any citations to specific pages, columns, lines, or figures in the prior art references and any interpretation of the reference should not be considered to be limiting in any way. A reference is relevant for all it contains and may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill in the art. See MPEP § 2123. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this Office action should be directed to the Examiner by phone at (571) 272-4214. Any response to this Office action should be labeled appropriately (including serial number, Art Unit 2132, and type of response) and mailed to Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; hand-carried or delivered to the Customer Service Window at the Knox Building, 501 Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA 22314; faxed to (571) 273-8300; or filed electronically using the Patent Center. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from the Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about the Patent Center and visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Verbrugge/ Kevin Verbrugge Primary Examiner Art Unit 2132
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 04, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 15, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602158
MANAGING NAMESPACE MAPPING IN A MEMORY SUB-SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596644
TECHNIQUES FOR LOGICAL-TO-PHYSICAL INFORMATION COMPRESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591475
CACHING LOOKUP TABLES FOR BLOCK FAMILY ERROR AVOIDANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585582
POWER-LOSS PROTECTION FOR ADDRESS CONVERSION TABLE USING A CHARGED CAPACITOR IN A STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585583
MULTIPLE WRITE PROGRAMMING FOR A SEGMENT OF A MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-2.5%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 570 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month