Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/981,702

Induction Coil Assembly for Uterine Ablation and Method

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 07, 2022
Examiner
VAN, QUANG T
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Aegea Medical Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
795 granted / 1078 resolved
+3.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1101
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1078 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15-18, 26 and 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sharma et al (US 2016/0354140) cited by applicant , in view of Fawal et al (US 5,801,602). Regarding claim 15, Sharma discloses induction-based micro-volume heating system comprising a closed loop ferrite core (ferromagnetic core 4903, Figures 49L, 49M; par. 0811); a wire configured to carry electric current coiled around a first portion of the closed loop ferrite core and at least partially surrounded by the closed loop ferrite core (Figure 49L: induction coil 4904; pr. 0811, par. 0813); a fluid tube configured to carry a fluid coiled around a second portion of the closed loop ferrite core and at least partially surrounded by the closed loop ferrite core (Figure 49L: grooves 4915 and 4998- which are channels formed for water or steam to flow around the ferromagnetic core; par. 0813); wherein the electric current in the wire generates a magnetizing inductance to inductively heat the fluid tube (par. 0089, par. 0142). However, Sharma does not disclose the closed loop ferrite core comprising two or more separable ferrite pieces. Fawal discloses a closed loop ferrite core comprising two or more separable ferrite pieces (col. 5, 25-32). It would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to utilize in Sharma the closed loop ferrite core comprising two or more separable ferrite pieces as taught by Fawal in order to suit user specific application. Regarding claims 16-18, Sharma discloses (Figure 49L and 49M: ferrite core 4903) and Fawal discloses ferrite core (450) comprising, figure 4, a ferrite side, a ferrite top, a ferrite bottom, and a ferrite center, and wherein the ferrite top (452) is separable from the ferrite bottom (454). Regarding claims 26, 30, Fawal discloses two or more separable ferrite pieces (452, 454) couple to one another to form a ferrite box (Figure 4). Claims 19-25, 27-29 and 31-34 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Alley et al (US 4,764,744) discloses overload relay having adjustably gapped current transformers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUANG T VAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4789. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven W Crabb can be reached at 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUANG T VAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761 October 6, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604374
SPLATTER COVER AND APPARATUS FOR USE IN MICROWAVE OVENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604372
ELECTRIC RANGE ADJUSTING HEAT POWER BASED ON PROPERTIES OF HEATING TARGET
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604376
MICROWAVE HEATING APPLIED TO MINING AND RELATED FEATURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593377
Method for Load Detection in a Cooking Chamber of a Cooking Device and Cooking Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588113
MICROWAVE OVEN CHILD RESISTANT DOOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+8.4%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1078 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month