Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/982,018

DYNAMIC AIR FILTRATION

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 07, 2022
Priority
Nov 08, 2021 — provisional 63/276,908
Examiner
HOPKINS, ROBERT A
Art Unit
1794
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Carrier Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1357 granted / 1604 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1622
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1604 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 20 recites “further comprising turning on an active filter”. Examiner has reviewed the current specification and is not able to locate a specific explanation of what is encompassed by “turning on an active filter”. Examiner notes that independent claim 16 defines “a plurality of movable filters” , however claim 16 does not refer to any of the plurality of movable filters as “active”, therefore examiner is unsure as to if the “active filter” is one of the plurality of movable filters, or another separate filter independent of the plurality of movable filters. Examiner furthermore respectfully submits a statement of “turning on” could refer to adding a specific component or composition to the filter to provide the filter with increased filtration capability, however the specification provides no guidance as to what is specifically referred to by “turning on an active filter”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by WO reference(WO2019/197693A1). WO reference in figures 1-3,6-9,15 teach a filter section of a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system(para 0108 stating “the variable filtration system could also be used in existing air conditioning or ventilation installations”) comprising: a plurality of filters (2,3 in figure 9) arranged in series relative to a flow path of air(air flow 1) through the filter section(conduit 10), the plurality of filters including at least one movable filter transformable between an extended position arranged within the flow path of air and a retracted position removed from the flow path of air(noting figure 9; para 0140 stating “this configuration is suitable for both for filters(2,3) of the same type of contaminant, where one of them is more efficient than the other, and depending on the concentration of the contaminant, one or the other filter(2,3) can be activated, as well as for filters of different contaminants or particles, which can be activated independently of each other depending on the concentrations and objectives of the contaminant that corresponds to each filter”) ; and at least one movement mechanism operably coupled to the at least one movable filter to transform the at least one movable filter between the extended position and the retracted position (para 0136 stating “the activation of the filter (2,3) may be manual or motorized”, wherein statement of “motorized” provides for at least one movement mechanism operably coupled to the at least one movable filter to transform the at least one movable filter between the extended position and the retracted position). With regards to claim 2, WO reference further teaches wherein the plurality of filters further comprises a filter(fixed filter 9 in figure 6) that is fixedly mounted within the flow path of air. With regards to claim 3, WO reference further teaches wherein the filter that is fixedly mounted is arranged upstream from the at least one movable filter(fixed filter 9 upstream in figure 6; para 0135 stating “or may be found within a variable filtration system in conjunction with other fixed filters (9)”). With regards to claim 4, WO reference further teaches wherein the filter that is fixedly mounted is a pre-filter. With regards to claim 5, WO reference further teaches wherein the filter that is fixedly mounted is arranged downstream from the at least one movable filter (para 0135 stating “or may be found within a variable filtration system in conjunction with other fixed filters (9)”) , wherein a second fixed filter downstream from the moveable filter in figure 6 is known from a statement of “in conjunction with other fixed filters (9)”. With regards to claim 6, WO reference further teaches wherein the filter that is fixedly mounted is an active filter. With regards to claim 7, WO reference further teaches wherein the at least one movable filter is translatable between the extended position and the retracted position. With regards to claim 8, WO reference further teaches wherein the at least one movable filter is rotatable between the extended position and the retracted position(figure 15 showing rotation of filter between extended position and retracted position). With regards to claim 9, WO reference further teaches wherein the at least one movable filter further comprises a plurality of movable filters, wherein a configuration of the plurality of movable filters varies(noting plurality of filters in figures 2,3,9, wherein one or more of the filters is activated or deactivated at any moment; para 0115 stating “when filtration requirements increase, the activation of highly efficient filters(2) associated with a smaller particle size, may be associated with the deactivation of less efficient filters(3), associated with a larger particle size”). With regards to claim 10, WO reference further teaches wherein the at least one movement mechanism includes a plurality of movement mechanisms, each movement mechanism being operably coupled to one of the plurality of movable filters(noting “motorized”). With regards to claim 11, WO reference further teaches wherein the at least one movement mechanism is operably coupled to the plurality of movable filters. Claims 12-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by WO reference(WO2019/197693A1). WO reference in figures 1-3,6-9,15 teach a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system(para 0108 stating “the variable filtration system could also be used in existing air conditioning or ventilation installations”) comprising: a filter section(filters 2,3) configured to receive air, the filter section including at least one movable filter(2,3) transformable between an extended position arranged within a flow path of the air and a retracted position removed from the flow path of the air (noting figure 9; para 0140 stating “this configuration is suitable for both for filters(2,3) of the same type of contaminant, where one of them is more efficient than the other, and depending on the concentration of the contaminant, one or the other filter(2,3) can be activated, as well as for filters of different contaminants or particles, which can be activated independently of each other depending on the concentrations and objectives of the contaminant that corresponds to each filter”) ; at least one sensor for monitoring an air quality of the air (para 0111 stating “in air conditioning and ventilation, to determine whether a filter (2,3, 4, 16, 17) should be activated or not, criteria based on indoor air quality, outdoor air quality or air quality downstream of the filter(2,3,4,16,17) may be used”, noting a statement of “criteria” provides for inclusion of a sensor mechanism for monitoring an air quality of the air) ; and a controller operably coupled to the at least one sensor and to the at least one movable filter, wherein the controller is configured to move the at least one movable filter between the extended position and the retracted position in response to the air quality of the air(para 0136 stating “activation order may be by external concentration, internal concentration, upstream or downstream of the contaminant that the filters(2,3), by time, by use or voluntary based on pre-established criteria). With regards to claim 13, WO reference further teaches wherein the at least one sensor is arranged upstream from the filter section(noting “upstream”). With regards to claim 14, WO reference further teaches wherein the at least one movable filter further comprises a plurality of movable filters (plurality of filters in figures 2,3,9) and a configuration of the plurality of movable filters varies. With regards to claim 15, WO reference further teaches wherein the controller is configured to select at least one of the plurality of movable filters to arrange within the flow path in response to the air quality measured by the at least one sensor. Claims 16-18, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by WO reference(WO2019/197693A1). WO reference in figures 1-3,6-9,15 teach a method of adjusting a configuration of a filter section of a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system(para 0108 stating “the variable filtration system could also be used in existing air conditioning or ventilation installations”) comprising: sensing an air quality of a flow of air upstream from the filter section(para 0111 stating “in air conditioning and ventilation, to determine whether a filter (2,3, 4, 16, 17) should be activated or not, criteria based on indoor air quality, outdoor air quality or air quality downstream of the filter(2,3,4,16,17) may be used”, noting a statement of “criteria” provides for inclusion of a sensor mechanism for monitoring an air quality of the air) ; identifying at least one of a plurality of movable filters to apply to the flow of air to achieve preset air quality limits of the HVAC system(noting activation of a high efficient filter 2 or less efficient filter 3); and moving the at least one movable filter identified into the flow of air. With regards to claim 17, WO reference further teaches further comprising moving another of the plurality of movable filters out of the flow of air. With regards to claim 18 , WO reference further teaches wherein identifying the at least one of the plurality of movable filters further comprises comparing the air quality of the flow of air with the preset air quality limits( para 0136 stating “activation order may be by external concentration, internal concentration, upstream or downstream of the contaminant that the filters(2,3), by time, by use or voluntary based on pre-established criteria). With regards to claim 20 , WO reference further teaches further comprising turning on an active filter. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 19 recites “ further comprising: sensing the air quality of the flow of air downstream from the filter section; sensing the air quality of an outdoor air provided to the HVAC system; and adjusting a position of an outside air damper in response to sensing the air quality of the outdoor air”. WO reference teaches sensing an air quality of a flow of air upstream from a filter section; however WO reference does not teach or suggest further comprising sensing the air quality of the flow of air downstream from the filter section; sensing the air quality of an outdoor air provided to the HVAC system; and adjusting a position of an outside air damper in response to sensing the air quality of the outdoor air. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT A HOPKINS whose telephone number is (571)272-1159. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 6am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at 5712707872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT A HOPKINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776 June 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678732
MEMBRANE-DEHUMIDIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR ELECTRONIC COMPONENT PROTECTION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678743
POROUS MEDIUM WITH ADJUSTABLE FLUID PERMEABILITY AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673285
AIR PURIFIER
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667813
NOZZLE FOR MIXING GAS WITH LIQUID WITH COMPACT DESIGN
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671100
FUEL CELL MEMBRANE HUMIDIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1604 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month