DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/01/2025 has been entered.
Response to Amendment
Claims 1-2, 12-13, and 21-22 are amended.
Claims 1-24 are pending.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 5, 7, 16 and 22-23 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claims 5, 16 and 23 recite “setting a point” and “the setting point” with the amended claims it is now unclear if the setting point refers to the previous setting a point or the newly amended setting point in their respective independent claims. For the purposes of examining, they are considered to refer to the setting a point.
Claims 7 and 22 recites the limitation "the point", claim 22 recites it twice. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1, 5-12, 16-17, 20-21 and 23-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakayama (US 9846201 B2).
In claim 1, Nakayama discloses a method (see claim 1), the method comprising: charging a battery (Fig. 1, 701) in a constant current (CC) charging mode (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “charged by a constant current”); iteratively updating a full state of charge (SOC) value of the battery while in the CC charging mode (Column 4 Lines 24-31 “full charge capacity outputted” “a voltage-based state of charge and a current-based state of charge compared with each other”, Column 24 equation 8, Lines 44-67 examiner considers before charging starts with a constant voltage to be still in said CC charging mode); when a measured voltage value of the battery is determined to be greater than or equal to a cutoff voltage value (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “reaches a predetermined limit voltage V_lim”), switching from the CC charging mode to a constant voltage (CV) charging mode and charging the battery in the CV charging mode (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “charged at the limit voltage V_lim, which is a constant voltage”); and iteratively updating the full SOC value while in the CV charging mode (Column 7 Lines 7-30); wherein the iteratively updating of the full SOC value while in the CC charging mode comprises determining whether the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached a set point for updating the full SOC value (Column 24, Lines 44-67, equation 8, “change-point”); and when the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached the point, updating the full SOC value while in the CC charging mode (Column 7-8 details about charge operation, corrected value of the full capacity, Column 24 equation 8, Lines 44-67), and wherein the last updated full SOC value in the CC charging mode is set as an initial full SOC value for CV charging mode (Column 7-8, Column 21 Line 56 – Column 22 Line 11, Column 23 Lines 19-25, Column 25 Lines 9-30, Equation 10 “reads the full charge capacity Qmax, and the state-of-charge initial value SOC_ini,”, “calculates a charge period Tcv for the constant voltage charge (CV charge)” see Eq. 10 uses Qmax from previous Eq. 8).
In claim 5 Nakayama discloses determining whether charging the battery has reached a start point by comparing a first measured current value of the battery being charged in the CV charging mode to a preset current associated with the start point (See Fig. 10); when the charging the battery reaches the start point, setting a point for updating the full SOC value (Column 8 Lines 39-51); determining whether the charging the battery has reached the set point (Column 8 Lines 39-51); when the charging the battery reaches the set point, predicting a full charge time of the battery and predicting a residual SOC that remains until the battery is fully charged, based on the predicted full charge time (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); and updating the full SOC value based on the predicted residual SOC (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12).
In claim 6 Nakayama discloses wherein the iteratively updating the full SOC value in the CV charging mode comprises: setting a subsequent point for updating the full SOC value (Column 18 Lines 7-31); when the battery reaches the set subsequent point, iteratively predicting a full charge time of the battery (Column 18 Lines 7-31), and iteratively predicting a residual SOC that remains until the battery is fully charged, based on the iteratively predicted full charge time (Column 18 Lines 7-31, See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); and iteratively updating the full SOC value based on the iteratively predicted residual SOC (Column 18 Lines 7-31, See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12).
In claim 7 Nakayama discloses all of claim 6. Nakayama further discloses wherein the predicting the residual SOC comprises: predicting the full charge time based on a first time value of a time at which charging the battery has reached the start point (Column 23 Lines 14-37 “initial value” “remaining charge time”), a second time value of a time at which charging the battery has reached the start point (Column 24 Line 50-Column 25 Line 17 “charge period”), a transformed value of the first measured current value (Column 24 Line 50-Column 25 Line 17 “SOC change”), a transformed value of a result value derived by subtracting a predetermined value from the first measured current value (Column 24 Line 50-Column 25 Line 17 see eq. 8 and 9), and a transformed value of a cutoff current value (Column 26 eq. 11); and predicting the residual SOC based on the predicted full charge time, the second time value, the result value, and the cutoff current value (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12).
In claim 8 Nakayama discloses all of claim 5. Nakayama further discloses wherein the transformed value of the first measured current value, the transformed value of the result value, and the transformed value of the cutoff current value are values obtained through a logarithmic transformation of the first measured current value, the result value, and the cutoff current value (See Fig. 10, 11, Column 26 Lines 17-45, Column 25 Lines 55-67, examiner notes applicants specification Par. 126 states “a cutoff current value, through a transformation method (e.g., a log scale) that transforms non-linearity into linearity” looking at Fig. 10, the logarithmic curve 650 is transformed using a gradient into linearity as shown in Fig. 11 which is considered to be said “logarithmic transformation”).
In claim 9 Nakayama discloses all of claim 7. Nakayama further discloses wherein the predicting the full charge time comprises: calculating a first difference value between the transformed value of the cutoff current value and the transformed value of the first measured current value (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); calculating a second difference value between the transformed value of the result value and the transformed value of the first measured current value (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); calculating a third difference value between the second time value and the first time value (Eq. 9, 10, 13); and predicting the full charge time using the calculated first difference value, the calculated second difference value, the calculated third difference value, and the first time value (Eq. 9, 10, 13).
In claim 10 Nakayama discloses wherein a method of updating the full SOC value in the CC charging mode differs from a method of updating the full SOC value in the CV charging mode (See Fig. 10, Eq. 7-12).
In claim 11 Nakayama discloses updating an absolute SOC (ASOC) of the battery using a battery model (See Eq. 5); determining whether the battery is fully charged (Eq. 11, Column 23 Lines 14-25); when the battery is determined to be fully charged, determining a relative SOC (RSOC) of the battery using a lastly updated full SOC value, the updated ASOC, and an unusable SOC (Fig. 11, Eq. 11, Column 23 Lines 14-25); and displaying an indication of the determined RSOC (Column 2 Lines 40-46, Column 11 Lines 1-17).
In claim 12 Nakayama discloses a method (see claim 1), the method comprising: charging a battery (Fig. 1, 701) in a constant current (CC) charging mode (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “charged by a constant current”); updating a full state of charge (SOC) value of the battery while in the CC charging mode (Column 4 Lines 24-31 “full charge capacity outputted” “a voltage-based state of charge and a current-based state of charge compared with each other”, Column 24 equation 8, Lines 44-67); when a measured voltage value of the battery is determined to be greater than or equal to a cutoff voltage value (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “reaches a predetermined limit voltage V_lim”), switching from the CC charging mode to a constant voltage (CV) charging mode and charging the battery in the CV charging mode (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “charged at the limit voltage V_lim, which is a constant voltage”); and updating in association with the CV charging mode, the full SOC value according to a second method that is different from the first method (Column 7 Lines 7-30; See Fig. 10, Eq. 7-12); wherein the iteratively updating of the full SOC value while in the CC charging mode comprises determining whether the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached a set point for updating the full SOC value (Column 24, Lines 44-67, equation 8, “change-point”); and when the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached the point, updating the full SOC value while in the CC charging mode (Column 7-8 details about charge operation, corrected value of the full capacity, Column 24 equation 8, Lines 44-67), and wherein the last updated full SOC value in the CC charging mode is set as an initial full SOC value for CV charging mode (Column 7-8, Column 21 Line 56 – Column 22 Line 11, Column 23 Lines 19-25, Column 25 Lines 9-30, Equation 10 “reads the full charge capacity Qmax, and the state-of-charge initial value SOC_ini,”, “calculates a charge period Tcv for the constant voltage charge (CV charge)” see Eq. 10 uses Qmax from previous Eq. 8).
In claim 16 Nakayama discloses wherein the updating the full SOC value in the second method comprises: determining whether charging the battery has reached a start point by comparing a first measured current value of the battery being charged in the CV charging mode to a current value at the start point (See Fig. 10); when the charging the battery reaches the start point, setting a point for updating the full SOC value (Column 8 Lines 39-51); determining whether the charging the battery has reached the set point (Column 8 Lines 39-51); when the charging the battery reaches the set point, predicting a full charge time of the battery and predicting a residual SOC that remains until the battery is fully charged, based on the predicted full charge time (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); and updating the full SOC value based on the predicted residual SOC (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12).
In claim 17 Nakayama discloses all of claim 16. Nakayama further discloses wherein the predicting the residual SOC comprises: predicting the full charge time based on a first time value of a time at which charging the battery has reached the preset start point (Column 23 Lines 14-37 “initial value” “remaining charge time”), a second time value of a time at which charging the battery has reached the preset point (Column 24 Line 50-Column 25 Line 17 “charge period”), a transformed value of the first measured current value (Column 24 Line 50-Column 25 Line 17 “SOC change”), a transformed value of a result value derived by subtracting a predetermined value from the first measured current value (Column 24 Line 50-Column 25 Line 17 see eq. 8 and 9), and a transformed value of the cutoff current value (Column 26 eq. 11); and predicting the residual SOC based on the predicted full charge time, the second time value, the result value, and the cutoff current value (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12).
In claim 20 Nakayama discloses updating an absolute SOC (ASOC) of the battery using a battery model (See Eq. 5); determining whether the battery is fully charged (Eq. 11, Column 23 Lines 14-25); when the battery is determined to be fully charged, determining a relative SOC (RSOC) of the battery using a lastly updated full SOC value, the updated ASOC, and an unusable SOC (Fig. 11, Eq. 11, Column 23 Lines 14-25); and displaying an indication of the determined RSOC (Column 2 Lines 40-46, Column 11 Lines 1-17).
In claim 21, Nakayama discloses an electronic device (Fig. 1), comprising: a battery (Fig. 1 701); a charger configured to charge a battery (Fig. 1, 701) in a constant current (CC) charging mode (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “charged by a constant current”); and charge the battery in a constant voltage (CV) charging mode when a condition is determined to be satisfied (Column 22 Line 65 – Column 23 Line 13 “reaches a predetermined limit voltage V_lim”, “charged at the limit voltage V_lim, which is a constant voltage”); a first circuit (Fig. 1, 718) configured to update a full state of charge (SOC) value of the battery according to a first method while in the CC charging mode (Column 4 Lines 24-31 “full charge capacity outputted” “a voltage-based state of charge and a current-based state of charge compared with each other”, Column 24 equation 8, Lines 44-67), wherein the last updated full SOC value in the CC charging mode is set as an initial full SOC value for CV charging mode (Column 21 Line 56 – Column 22 Line 11, Column 23 Lines 19-25 Examiner notes that the “full” SOC value will always be 100% as SOC is a ratio of the currently available energy to the maximum energy a battery can store) update the full SOC of the battery according to a second method while in the CV charging mode (Column 7 Lines 7-30, Column 21 Line 56 – Column 22 Line 11, Column 23 Lines 19-25), and determine a relative SOC (RSOC) of the battery using a lastly updated value of the full SOC value in the CV charging mode (Column 7-8, Column 21 Line 56 – Column 22 Line 11, Column 23 Lines 19-25, Column 25 Lines 9-30, Equation 10 “reads the full charge capacity Qmax, and the state-of-charge initial value SOC_ini,”, “calculates a charge period Tcv for the constant voltage charge (CV charge)” see Eq. 10 uses Qmax from previous Eq. 8), an absolute SOC (ASOC) of the battery, and an unusable SOC (Fig. 11, Eq. 11, Column 23 Lines 14-25); and a processor configured to receive the determined RSOC from the first circuit and provide an indication of the received RSOC (Fig. 1, 722, 720, Column 2 Lines 40-46, Column 11 Lines 1-17); wherein, in the first method, the first circuit is configured to: determine whether the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached a set point for updating the full SOC value (Column 24, Lines 44-67, equation 8, “change-point”); and when the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached the point, updating the full SOC value while in the CC charging mode (Column 7-8 details about charge operation, corrected value of the full capacity, Column 24 equation 8, Lines 44-67).
In claim 23 Nakayama discloses wherein, in the second method, the first circuit is configured to: determining whether charging the battery has reached a start point by comparing a first measured current value of the battery being charged in the CV charging mode to a current value at the preset start point (See Fig. 10); when the charging the battery reaches the start point, setting a point for updating the full SOC value (Column 8 Lines 39-51); determining whether the charging the battery has reached the set point (Column 8 Lines 39-51); when the charging the battery reaches the set point, predicting a full charge time of the battery and predicting a residual SOC that remains until the battery is fully charged, based on the predicted full charge time (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); and updating the full SOC value based on the predicted residual SOC (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12).
In claim 24 Nakayama discloses iteratively update the full SOC value of the battery according to a first method while in the CC charging mode (Column 4 Lines 24-31 “full charge capacity outputted” “a voltage-based state of charge and a current-based state of charge compared with each other”, Column 24 equation 8, Lines 44-67), update the full SOC of the battery according to a second method while in the CV charging mode (Column 7 Lines 7-30).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 2-4, 13-15, 18-19 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakayama in view of CHA (US 20190123394 A1).
In claim 2, Nakayama discloses herein the iteratively updating the full SOC value in the CC charging mode comprises: when determined that the charging of the battery has reached the point, calculating a resistance value of the battery (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62) for a first interval before the set point (See Fig. 10 examiner considers the time before switching to Icv to be said interval); updating the full SOC value based on correlation information correlating SOC and open- circuit voltage (OCV), the calculated resistance value, a cutoff current value, and the cutoff voltage value (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62); setting a subsequent point for updating the full SOC value (Fig. 12, Column 7 Lines 7-30); and when the battery reaches the set subsequent point, iteratively updating the full SOC value based on a second resistance value (Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20) of the battery for a second interval between the set point and the subsequent point (See Fig. 10 examiner considers the time after switching to Icv to be said interval), the correlation information, the cutoff current value, and the cutoff voltage value (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62).
Nakayama does not explicitly disclose calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for an interval before the point; and a second average resistance value of the battery (Emphasis added).
CHA teaches calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for an interval before the point (Par. 17-18 “average internal resistance value” “the predefined time”), a second average resistance value of the battery (See Fig. 4 430 to 470 to 430), updating the full SOC value based on a second average resistance value (Par. 17-18)
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filled to calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for an interval before the point and a second average resistance value of the battery, andupdating the full SOC value based on a second average resistance value based on the teachings of CHA in combination with the disclosure of Nakayama in order to correct for measurement error of a current sensor over time (CHA par. 22) thus leading to a more accurate system.
In claim 3, Nakayama does not explicitly disclose wherein the calculating the average resistance value comprises: at points during the first interval, calculating a resistance value using a measured voltage value, an estimated OCV value, and a measured electrical current value of the battery; and calculating the average resistance value by averaging the calculated resistance values.
CHA teaches wherein the calculating the average resistance value comprises: at points during the first interval, calculating a resistance value using a measured voltage value, an estimated OCV value, and a measured electrical current value of the battery (Par. 17-18); and calculating the average resistance value by averaging the calculated resistance values (Par. 17-18).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filled wherein the calculating the average resistance value comprises: at points during the first interval, calculating a resistance value using a measured voltage value, an estimated OCV value, and a measured electrical current value of the battery; and calculating the average resistance value by averaging the calculated resistance values based on the teachings of CHA in combination with the disclosure of Nakayama in order to correct for measurement error of a current sensor over time (CHA par. 22) thus leading to a more accurate system.
In claim 4, Nakayama discloses multiplying the calculated resistance value with the cutoff current value (Column 12 Eq. 3); predicting, as an OCV of the battery when the battery is fully charged, a difference value between the cutoff voltage value and a result of the multiplying (Column 23 Eq. 7); and determining an SOC corresponding to the predicted OCV using the correlation information (Column 26 Lines 44-67), and updating the full SOC value based on the determined SOC (Column 26 Lines 21-50).
Nakayama does not explicitly disclose multiplying the average resistance value with the cutoff current value (Emphasis added).
CHA teaches the calculated average resistance value as described above.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filled that multiplying the average resistance value with the cutoff current value; based on the teachings of CHA in combination with the disclosure of Nakayama in order to correct for measurement error of a current sensor over time (CHA par. 22) thus leading to a more accurate system.
In claim 13, Nakayama discloses herein the updating the full SOC value according to the first method comprises: when determined that the charging of the battery has reached the point, calculating a first resistance value of the battery (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62) for a first interval before the set point (See Fig. 10 examiner considers the time before switching to Icv to be said interval); updating the full SOC value based on correlation information correlating SOC value and open-circuit voltage (OCV) value, the calculated resistance value, a cutoff current value, and the cutoff voltage value (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62); setting a subsequent point for updating the full SOC value (Fig. 12, Column 7 Lines 7-30).
Nakayama does not explicitly disclose calculating an first average resistance value of the battery for an interval before the point; (Emphasis added).
CHA teaches calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for an interval before the point (Par. 17-18 “average internal resistance value” “the predefined time”), updating the full SOC value based on the first average resistance value (Par. 17-18).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filled to calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for an interval before the point based on the teachings of CHA in combination with the disclosure of Nakayama in order to correct for measurement error of a current sensor over time (CHA par. 22) thus leading to a more accurate system.
In claim 14, Nakayama does not explicitly disclose wherein the calculating the average resistance value comprises: at points during the first interval, calculating a resistance value using a measured voltage value, an estimated OCV value, and a measured current value of the battery; and calculating the average resistance value by averaging the calculated resistance values.
CHA teaches wherein the calculating the average resistance value comprises: at points during the first interval, calculating a resistance value using a measured voltage value, an estimated OCV value, and a measured current value of the battery (Par. 17-18); and calculating the average resistance value by averaging the calculated resistance values (Par. 17-18).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filled wherein the calculating the average resistance value comprises: at points during the first interval, calculating a resistance value using a measured voltage value, an estimated OCV value, and a measured current value of the battery; and calculating the average resistance value by averaging the calculated resistance values based on the teachings of CHA in combination with the disclosure of Nakayama in order to correct for measurement error of a current sensor over time (CHA par. 22) thus leading to a more accurate system.
In claim 15, Nakayama in view of Cha discloses all of claim 13, including an average resistance. Nakayama further discloses multiplying the calculated resistance value with the cutoff current value (Column 12 Eq. 3); predicting, as an OCV of the battery when the battery is fully charged, a difference value between the cutoff voltage value and a result of the multiplying (Column 23 Eq. 7); and determining an SOC corresponding to the predicted OCV using the correlation information (Column 26 Lines 44-67), and updating the full SOC value based on the determined SOC (Column 26 Lines 21-50).
In claim 18 Nakayama discloses all of claim 17. Nakayama further discloses wherein the transformed value of the first measured current value, the transformed value of the result value, and the transformed value of the cutoff current value are values obtained through a logarithmic transformation of the first measured current value, the result value, and the cutoff current value (See Fig. 10, 11, Column 26 Lines 17-45, Column 25 Lines 55-67, examiner notes applicants specification Par. 126 states “a cutoff current value, through a transformation method (e.g., a log scale) that transforms non-linearity into linearity” looking at Fig. 10, the logarithmic curve 650 is transformed using a gradient into linearity as shown in Fig. 11 which is considered to be said “logarithmic transformation”).
In claim 19 Nakayama discloses all of claim 17. Nakayama further discloses wherein the predicting the full charge time comprises: calculating a first difference value between the transformed value of the cutoff current value and the transformed value of the first measured current value (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); calculating a second difference value between the transformed value of the result value and the transformed value of the first measured current value (See Fig. 12, Eq. 7-12); calculating a third difference value between the second time value and the first time value (Eq. 9, 10, 13); and predicting the full charge time using the calculated first difference value, the calculated second difference value, the calculated third difference value, and the first time value (Eq. 9, 10, 13).
In claim 22, Nakayama discloses wherein, in the first method, the first circuit is configured to: when the point is reached, calculating a resistance value of the battery (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62) for a first interval before the point (See Fig. 10 examiner considers the period before Icv to be said interval); updating the full SOC value based on correlation information correlating SOC and open- circuit voltage (OCV), the calculated resistance value, a cutoff current value, and the cutoff voltage value (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62); setting a subsequent point for updating the full SOC value (Fig. 12, Column 7 Lines 7-30); and when the battery reaches the set subsequent point, iteratively updating the full SOC value based on a resistance value of the battery for an interval between the point and the subsequent point, the correlation information, the cutoff current value, and the cutoff voltage value (Column 12 Eq. 4, Lines 55-65 Column 19 Lines Eq. 6, 1-20, Column 23 Eq. 7, Lines 43-62).
Nakayama does not explicitly disclose calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for a first interval before the point; (Emphasis added).
CHA teaches calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for a first interval before the point (Par. 17-18 “average internal resistance value” “the predefined time”), updating the full SOC value based on an average resistance value (Par. 17-18)
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filled to calculating a first average resistance value of the battery for a first interval before the point based on the teachings of CHA in combination with the disclosure of Nakayama in order to correct for measurement error of a current sensor over time (CHA par. 22) thus leading to a more accurate system.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 12/01/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. in regards to applicant’s 102 arguments, the examiner respectfully disagrees. The claims do not specify any limitations on the CC charging mode that would exclude the inclusion of the change point cited by the examiner as the CV charging has not yet started, examiner considers this to still be in a CC charging mode. Thus, as described above, Nakayama discloses the cited features. Regarding applicants 103 arguments the examiner respectfully disagrees, the prior art f record is within the BRI as described above.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 20160274193 A1, IMAIZUMI teaches wherein the iteratively updating of the full SOC value (Fig. 4 S11) while in the CC charging mode (Fig. 4, S2) comprises determining whether the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached a set point for updating the full SOC value (Fig. 4, S8, “n” is considered to be said setpoint); and when the charging of the battery in the CC charging mode has reached the set point, updating the full SOC value while in the CC charging mode (Fig. 4, S9), and iteratively updating the full SOC value while in the CV charging mode (see fig. 3);
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDON J BECKER whose telephone number is (571)431-0689. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-5:30.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shelby Turner can be reached at (571) 272-6334. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/B.J.B/Examiner, Art Unit 2857
/SHELBY A TURNER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2857