Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/984,600

SWITCHING METHOD AND APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 10, 2022
Priority
May 15, 2020 — CN 202010414860.5 +1 more
Examiner
ACOLATSE, KODZOVI
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
783 granted / 935 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
989
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 935 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending in this office action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amendment filed 06/17/2026 have been considered but are not persuasive. The reasons set forth below. Applicant Argues: On pages of the remarks, applicant argues Nam fails to teach or suggest "receiving, by the first terminal device from the network device, downlink control information, wherein the downlink control information includes a first information field indicating at least one of frequency resource position information or BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit" as recited by independent claim 1, as amended. Nam does not mention "downlink control information" that is used to indicate at least one of frequency resource position information or BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit." In response, the Examiner respectfully submits: Nam teaches in Fig. 9-11 and [0095], [0097], [0102]-[0106], that the UE receives DCI with identification of the BWPs. Applicant Argues: On pages of the remarks, applicant argues Nam also fails to teach or suggest "determining, by the first terminal device, to switch from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit" based on "the bandwidth unit configuration information and the at least one of the frequency resource position information or the BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit" as recited by independent claim 1, as amended. In response, the Examiner respectfully submits: Nam teaches in Fig. 11 and [0115]-[0121] that the UE switches from BWP1 to BWP3 based on the BWP group 1 (=bandwidth unit configuration information) and the identification of the BWP, i.e. BWP1 to BWP 3 (= BWP identification information). Applicant Argues: On pages of the remarks, applicant argues Nam also fails to teach or suggest Next, Nam fails to teach or suggest "a switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit includes a first delay", "the first delay being less than a second delay of a second terminal device performing bandwidth unit switching", and "the second terminal device being a legacy terminal"; or "the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit includes one of N delays", "the N delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays includes the first delay, and the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching" In response, the Examiner respectfully submits: See rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 4-8, 10-12, 14-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nam et al (US 2020/0245304 A1) in view of Jung et al (US 2023/0180199 A1). Regarding claim 1, Nam teaches a switching method, wherein the method comprises: receiving, by a first terminal device from a network device, bandwidth unit configuration information, wherein the bandwidth unit configuration information includes configuration information of a first bandwidth unit and configuration information of a second bandwidth unit (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0098]-[0101], [0115]-[0117], terminal configured by a BS with groups of BWPs, Group 1/first bandwidth unit and Group 2/second bandwidth unit); receiving, by the first terminal device from the network device, downlink control information, wherein the downlink control information includes a first information field indicating at least one of frequency resource position information or BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 9-11; [0095], [0097], [0102]-[0106], UE receives DCI with identification of the BWPs); and determining, by the first terminal device, to switch from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit based on the bandwidth unit configuration information and the at least one of the frequency resource position information or the BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 11; [0115]-[0121] UE switches from BWP1 to BWP3 based on the BWP group 1 and the identification of the BWP, i.e. BWP1 to BWP 3), wherein a switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit includes a first delay, the first delay being less than a second delay of a second terminal device performing bandwidth unit switching (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0107] UE switching between BWPs in the same group with a first switching delay that is less than the switching delay between BWPs form different groups). Nam does not explicitly disclose wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay and the second delay being of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching. Jung teaches wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal (Jung: [0148], reduced capability UE having a bandwidth part switching delay relaxed/smaller than NR UEs/legacy UEs); the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching (Jung: [0142], Table 8.6.2-1; terminal device with different capabilities having plurality (N=4 in this case) BWP switch delay). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Nam wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching as disclosed by Jung to provide a system for selective decoding of physical downlink control candidates (Jung: Abstract). Regarding claim 7, Nam teaches a switching method, comprising: sending, by a network device, bandwidth unit configuration information to a first terminal device, wherein the bandwidth unit configuration information includes configuration information of a first bandwidth unit and configuration information of a second bandwidth unit (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0098]-[0100], [0115]-[0117], terminal configured with groups of BWPs, Group 1/first bandwidth unit and Group 2/second bandwidth unit); sending, by the network device, downlink control information, wherein the downlink control information includes a first information field indicating at least one of frequency resource position information or BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 9-11; [0095], [0097], [0102]-[0106], UE receives DCI with identification of the BWPs); scheduling, by the network device, data of the first terminal device based on a switching delay in switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit based on the bandwidth unit configuration information and the at least one of the frequency resource position information or the BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 11; UE switches from BWP1 to BWP3 based on the BWP group 1 and the identification of the BWP, i.e. BWP1 to BWP 3), wherein the switching delay includes a first delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit, the first delay being less than a second delay of a second terminal device performing bandwidth unit switching (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0107] UE switching between BWPs in the same group with a first switching delay that is less than the switching delay between BWPs form different groups). Nam does not explicitly disclose wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay and the second delay being of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching. Jung teaches wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal (Jung: [0148], reduced capability UE having a bandwidth part switching delay relaxed/smaller than NR UEs/legacy UEs); the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching (Jung: [0142], Table 8.6.2-1; terminal device with different capabilities having plurality (N=4 in this case) BWP switch delay). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Nam wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching as disclosed by Jung to provide a system for selective decoding of physical downlink control candidates (Jung: Abstract). Regarding claim 11, Nam teaches a communication apparatus, wherein the apparatus comprises: a receiver, configured to receive bandwidth unit configuration information, wherein the bandwidth unit configuration information includes configuration information of a first bandwidth unit and configuration information of a second bandwidth unit (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0098]-[0100], [0115]-[0117], terminal configured with groups of BWPs, Group 1/first bandwidth unit and Group 2/second bandwidth unit); wherein the receiver is further configured to receive downlink control information, wherein the downlink control information includes a first information field indicating at least one of frequency resource position information or BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 9-11; [0095], [0097], [0102]-[0106], UE receives DCI with identification of the BWPs); a processor, configured to switch from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit based on the bandwidth unit configuration information and the at least one of the frequency resource position information or the BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 11; UE switches from BWP1 to BWP3 based on the BWP group 1 and the identification of the BWP, i.e. BWP1 to BWP 3), wherein a switching delay of the processor switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit includes a first delay, the first delay being less than a second delay usable by a second terminal device to perform bandwidth unit switching (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0107] UE switching between BWPs in the same group with a first switching delay that is less than the switching delay between BWPs form different groups). Nam does not explicitly disclose wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay and the second delay being of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching. Jung teaches wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal (Jung: [0148], reduced capability UE having a bandwidth part switching delay relaxed/smaller than NR UEs/legacy UEs); the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching (Jung: [0142], Table 8.6.2-1; terminal device with different capabilities having plurality (N=4 in this case) BWP switch delay). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Nam wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching as disclosed by Jung to provide a system for selective decoding of physical downlink control candidates (Jung: Abstract). Regarding claim 17, Nam teaches a switching apparatus, comprising: a transmitter, configured to send bandwidth unit configuration information to a first terminal device, wherein the bandwidth unit configuration information includes configuration information of a first bandwidth unit and configuration information of a second bandwidth unit (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0098]-[0100], [0115]-[0117], terminal configured with groups of BWPs, Group 1/first bandwidth unit and Group 2/second bandwidth unit); the transmitter further configured to send downlink control information, wherein the downlink control information includes a first information field indicating at least one of frequency resource position information or BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 9-11; [0102], UE receives DCI with identification of the BWPs); a processor, configured to schedule data of the first terminal device based on a switching delay n switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit based on the bandwidth unit configuration information and the at least one of the frequency resource position information or the BWP identification information of the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit (Nam: Fig. 11; UE switches from BWP1 to BWP3 based on the BWP group 1 and the identification of the BWP, i.e. BWP1 to BWP 3), wherein the switching delay includes a first delay, the first delay being less than a second delay usable by a second terminal device to perform bandwidth unit switching (Nam: Figs. 9-11; [0107] UE switching between BWPs in the same group with a first switching delay that is less than the switching delay between BWPs form different groups). Nam does not explicitly disclose wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay and the second delay being of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching. Jung teaches wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal (Jung: [0148], reduced capability UE having a bandwidth part switching delay relaxed/smaller than NR UEs/legacy UEs); the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching (Jung: [0142], Table 8.6.2-1; terminal device with different capabilities having plurality (N=4 in this case) BWP switch delay). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Nam wherein the first terminal device is a reduced capability terminal device and the second terminal device being a legacy terminal or the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes one of N delays, the N delays are switching delays being supported by the first terminal device, N is an integer greater than or equal to 2, and the N delays comprise includes a first delay, the second delay of the second terminal device performing the bandwidth unit switching as disclosed by Jung to provide a system for selective decoding of physical downlink control candidates (Jung: Abstract). Regarding claims 2, 8, 12 and 18, Nam teaches wherein the second terminal device is includes a legacy terminal device in a new radio (NR) system (Nam: Fig. 9, [0067]). Regarding claims 4, 10, 14 and 20, Nam teaches wherein a frequency resource position of the first bandwidth unit is different from a frequency resource position of the second bandwidth unit, the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit correspond to different BWP identifiers, and the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes a delay other than the first delay of the N delays (Nam: Fig. 11; [0107], BWPS in different groups have larger switching delays/delay other than the first delay). Regarding claims 5 and 15, Nam teaches wherein the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit correspond to different BWP identifiers, the first bandwidth unit correlating with the second bandwidth unit, and the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit 4sincludes the first delay (Nam: Fig. 11; [0107], BWPS in same group/correlated have low switching delay/ first delay). Regarding claims 6 and 16, Nam teaches wherein the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit correspond to different BWP identifiers, the first bandwidth unit not correlated correlating with the second bandwidth unit, and the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes a delay other than the first delay of the N delays (Nam: Fig. 11; [0107], BWPS in different groups have larger switching delays/delay other than the first delay). Claims 3, 9, 13 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nam et al (US 2020/0245304 A1) in view of Jung et al (US 2023/0180199 A1) in further view of Li et al (WO 2018/228416 A1) (US 2022/0345281 A1) used as the English translation). Regarding claims 3, 9, 13 and 19, Nam teaches. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim 1, and the switching delay of the first terminal device switching from the first bandwidth unit to the second bandwidth unit is-includes the first delay (Nam: Fig. 11; [0107], BWPS in the same group have switch delay/first delay lower than inter-group switching delay). Nam does not explicitly disclose wherein a frequency resource position of the first bandwidth unit is different from a frequency resource position of the second bandwidth unit, the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit correspond to a same bandwidth part (BWP) identifier. Li teaches wherein a frequency resource position of the first bandwidth unit is different from a frequency resource position of the second bandwidth unit, the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit correspond to a same bandwidth part (BWP) identifier (Li: Fig. 5; [0122], BWP group with the group being identified by an ID). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Nam wherein a frequency resource position of the first bandwidth unit is different from a frequency resource position of the second bandwidth unit, the first bandwidth unit and the second bandwidth unit correspond to a same bandwidth part (BWP) identifier as disclosed by Li to provide a system for configuring bandwidth parts in a wireless communication system (Li: Abstract). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KODZOVI ACOLATSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1999. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10 am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Avellino Joseph can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KODZOVI ACOLATSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Aug 18, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706853
TIMESTAMP SYNCHRONIZATION BETWEEN HOST AND NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707346
HANDOVER MANAGEMENT IN A SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707341
INTEGRATION OF PROACTIVITY IN WIRELESS NETWORKS VIA TARGETED-CONTRACTS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707465
EFFICIENT TECHNIQUES FOR RESOURCE SELECTION ASSISTANCE REPORTING FOR NR REL-17 SIDELINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701574
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, BASE STATION, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 935 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month