Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/984,811

CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WITH REGENERATIVE DRIVE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 10, 2022
Examiner
GLASS, ERICK DAVID
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Otis Elevator Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
626 granted / 700 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
723
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 700 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, and 10-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vrankovic (PGPUB 2014/0116810) in view of Rossign0l (PGPUB 2014/0008155). With respect to claim 1, Vrankovic teaches a conveyance system, comprising: an alternating current (AC) power source (fig. 1, 102); a machine (fig. 1, 110) for moving a conveyance apparatus (fig. 2, 212); a regenerative drive (fig. 1, 106), wherein the machine is connected to the AC power source by the regenerative drive, the regenerative drive comprising: a direct current (DC) bus (); and a machine control circuit (fig. 1, 104), the conveyance system further comprising: an energy harvesting device (fig. 1, 116); and a switching arrangement (fig. 1, 112/114), arranged between the energy harvesting device and the machine control circuit, wherein the switching arrangement is switchable between a first condition (paragraph 0025; 1 std operating mode), in which the energy harvesting device (paragraph 0021; contacts disconnect when not regenerative mode) is disconnected from the machine control circuit, and a second condition (paragraph 0025; 2 renewable power mode) in which the energy harvesting device is operatively connected to at least one switching device of the second plurality of switching devices (paragraph 0021; connects) of the machine control circuit. Vrankovic does not teach a converter, comprising a first plurality of switching devices in selective communication with each phase of the AC power source and with the DC bus; and machine comprising a second plurality of switching devices in selective communication with each phase of the machine and with the DC bus. Rossignol teaches a converter (fig. 6, 38), comprising a first plurality of switching devices (fig. 6, transistors of 38) in selective communication (paragraph 0066) with each phase of the AC power source and with the DC bus (fig. 6, 40a); and comprising a second plurality of switching devices (fig. 6, transistors of 34a) in selective communication with each phase of the machine (fig. 6, 12) and with the DC bus. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have Vrankovic convert ac source to dc bus and back to ac motor, as in Rossignol, since it has been held that omission of an element and its function in a combination where the remaining elements perform the same functions as before involves only routine skill in the art. In re Karlson, 136 USPQ 184. With respect to claim 2, Vrankovic teaches further comprising a switching controller (fig. 1, 104), arranged to control the switching arrangement (paragraph 0022) to switch between the first condition and the second condition. With respect to claim 3, Vrankovic does not teach wherein the switching controller is arranged to switch the switching arrangement to the second condition when the machine is stationary. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have to have system switch when machine is stationary, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. With respect to claim 4, Vrankovic does not teach comprising a drive controller arranged to control switching of the first plurality of switching devices and the second plurality of switching devices so as to control the machine, wherein the drive controller comprises the switching controller. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have the control system of Vrankovic to include a drive controller, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. With respect to claim 5, Vrankovic does not teach wherein the machine comprises a star point, at which all phases of the machine meet, wherein the star point is arranged to be accessible from an exterior of the machine, and wherein the switching arrangement is connected to the star point. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have control system of Vrankovic for motor to be star configured, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. With respect to claim 10, Vrankovic does not teach further comprising a voltage measurement device, connected to the energy harvesting device and arranged to measure the voltage produced by the energy harvesting device. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have control system of Vrankovic to include voltage sensing device, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. With respect to claim 11, Vrankovic teaches wherein the conveyance system is an elevator system (paragraph 0023). With respect to claim 12, Vrankovic teaches wherein the building is a residential building, or an office building, or a commercial building (paragraph 0017). With respect to claim 13, Vrankovic teaches a method of operating a regenerative drive of a conveyance system, the regenerative drive comprising a direct current (DC) bus, a converter comprising a first plurality of switching devices in selective communication with each phase of an AC power source and with the DC bus, and a machine control circuit fig. 1, 104) comprising a second plurality of switching devices in selective communication with each phase of a machine and with the DC bus, the method comprising: driving movement of the machine (fig. 1, 110) with power from the AC power source (fig. 1, 102) using the regenerative drive (fig. 1, 106), wherein the machine is arranged to move a conveyance apparatus (fig. 2, 212) of the conveyance system; when motion of the machine (paragraph 0020; regeneration created during braking) is being braked, harvesting power from the machine using the regenerative drive; switching a switching arrangement from a first condition (paragraph 0025; 1 std operating mode), in which an energy harvesting device is disconnected (paragraph 0021; contacts disconnect when not regenerative mode) from the machine control circuit of the regenerative drive, to a second condition in which the energy harvesting device is operatively connected (paragraph 0025; 2 renewable power mode) to at least one switching device of the second plurality of switching devices (paragraph 0021; connects) of the machine control circuit. Vrankovic does not teach a converter comprising a first plurality of switching devices in selective communication with each phase of an AC power source and with the DC bus, and comprising a second plurality of switching devices in selective communication with each phase of a machine and with the DC bus. Rossignol teaches a converter (fig. 6, 38) comprising a first plurality of switching devices (fig. 6, transistors of 38) in selective communication with each phase of an AC power source and (fig. 6, 6) with the DC bus, and comprising a second plurality of switching devices (fig. 6, transistors of 34) in selective communication with each phase of a machine (fig. 6, 12) and with the DC bus (fig. 6, 40a). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have Vrankovic convert ac source to dc bus and back, as in Rossignol since it has been held that omission of an element and its function in a combination where the remaining elements perform the same functions as before involves only routine skill in the art. In re Karlson, 136 USPQ 184. With respect to claim 14, Vrankovic teaches transferring power harvested from the energy harvesting device when the machine is stationary to the AC power source, through the converter; and/or transferring power harvested from the energy harvesting device when the machine is stationary to a battery connected (paragraph 0020) to the DC bus. With respect to claim 15, Vrankovic teaches a software product (paragraph 0025; software routine) which, when implemented on a controller (fig. 1, 104) of a conveyance system, causes the controller to carry out the method as claimed in claim 13. Claims 6-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERICK DAVID GLASS whose telephone number is (571)272-8395. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri_8-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERICK D GLASS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 10, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12580504
CURRENT BASED RESONANT FREQUENCY TRACKING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573973
SALIENCY TRACKING FOR BRUSHLESS DC MOTORS AND OTHER PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559343
EMERGENCY TERMINAL DECELERATION IN ELEVATOR SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552647
HOIST APPARATUS COMPRISING A MONITORING DEVICE AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM USING THE HOIST APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12556114
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN OPERATING DEVICE COMPRISING A MASTER ACTUATOR AND A SLAVE ACTUATOR AND ASSOCIATED HOME AUTOMATION SHADING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 700 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month