Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/985,369

QUANTUM STATE PREPARATION CIRCUIT GENERATING METHOD AND SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM CHIP

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 11, 2022
Examiner
BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA
Art Unit
2144
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

77%
Career Allow Rate
310 granted / 404 resolved
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 pending
434
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION The action is in response to claims dated 12/8/2025. Claims pending in the case: 1-2, 4-11, 13-19 Claims cancelled: 3, 12 and 20 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-11, 13-19 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim(s) 1, 10 and 18 in the relevant part read: “combining the at least one uniform control matrix circuit to obtain…”. Based on the claim language, it is unclear what is being referred to as the “combining”. The limitation does not indicate what the “at least one uniform control matrix circuit” is to be combined with. As such, a person of reasonable skill in the art would not be apprised of the metes and bounds of the invention. All claims dependent on this/these claim(s) are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) due to the virtue of their respective direct and indirect dependencies. Claim Rejections using prior art Claims 1, 10 and 18 include dependent claims for which no prior art was found in the prior action. However the limitations as amended do not address the 112b rejection presented in the prior office action as explained above. Since the limitations are not clear further amendment is required to overcome the above rejection. Thus a conclusive decision on patentability could not be reached at this time. Applicant is requested to address the above rejection to help further prosecution. Response to Arguments Applicants’ amendments to claims have been fully considered but does not overcome the 35 U.S.C. § 112b rejection as explained above. These rejections are respectfully maintained. Applicants’ prior art arguments have been fully considered and the amendments overcome the prior art rejection in the previous action. These rejections are respectfully withdrawn. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANDRITA BRAHMACHARI whose telephone number is (571)272-9735. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 11 am to 8 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tamara Kyle can be reached at 571 272 4241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Mandrita Brahmachari/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2144
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 11, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12596746
AUDIO PREVIEWING METHOD, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596469
COMBINED DATA DISPLAY WITH HISTORIC DATA ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591358
DAMAGE DETECTION PORTAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585979
MANAGING DATA DRIFT AND OUTLIERS FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TRAINED FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585992
MACHINE LEARNING WITH ATTRIBUTE FEEDBACK BASED ON EXPRESS INDICATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 404 resolved cases by this examiner