DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/03/2026 has been entered.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (CN: 113299855 A~ hereinafter “Li”) of record in view of Yoon et al. (US. Pub: 2020/0168678 A1~ hereinafter “Yoon”). The Examiner is using the US. Pub: 2024/0099079 A1 of record as the English translation of the foreign reference.
Regarding claim 1, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) a display device, comprising: a display panel ([0023]) including a light emitting area (102) and a transmissive area (101) for conveying light to a sensor disposed beneath the display panel; wherein the transmissive area (101) comprises: a transmissive layer (212) for conveying light and having a non-planar top surface; and a cathode patterning material (51) formed to cover the non-planar top surface of the transmissive layer, wherein the light emitting area (3) comprises a light emitting element including an anode electrode (31), a light emitting layer (32), and a cathode electrode (33).
Li does not expressly disclose the cathode patterning material and the cathode electrode are positioned on a same plane; and wherein the cathode electrode is arranged to overlap the light emitting area and the cathode patterning material is arranged to not overlap the light emitting area.
Yoon in the same field of endeavor discloses (in at least figs. 1-4 and 13) a cathode patterning material (380) and a cathode electrode (270), wherein the cathode patterning material (380) and the cathode electrode (270) are positioned on a same plane (see at least figs. 1 and 13); and wherein the cathode electrode (270) is arranged to overlap the light emitting area (i.e. where item 370 is formed) and the cathode patterning material (380) is arranged to not overlap the light emitting area (see figs. 1-4 and 13).
Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to consider arranging the cathode patterning material and the cathode electrode of Li in the same plane as taught by Yoon, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. Park et al. (US. Pub: 2022/0181384 A1) of record also disclose (in at least fig. 2) the cathode patterning material (BNK2) and the cathode electrode (CE) are positioned on the same plane (see fig. 2; [0087]).
Regarding claim 2, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the transmissive layer (212) comprises at least one recessed region for increasing a surface area of the transmissive layer.
Regarding claim 3, Li discloses (in at least fig. 2) the transmissive layer (212) comprises at least one first recessed region having a first shape (see fig. 2) and at least one second recessed region having a second shape same as the first shape.
Li does not expressly disclose the first recess shape is different from the second recess shape.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to consider forming the first recess and the second recess of Li with different shapes, since it has been held that a mere change of shape of a component involves only routine skill in the art.
Regarding claim 4, Li discloses (in at least fig. 2) the non-planar top surface comprises a portion of the transmissive layer (212) having a first height (i.e. the top middle portion) and a portion of the transmissive layer (212) having a second height (i.e. the edges) that is less than the first height.
Regarding claim 5, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the transmissive area (101) further comprising a capping layer (52) formed on the cathode patterning material (51).
Regarding claim 6, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the cathode patterning material (51) covers a portion of the transmissive area (101), and wherein the capping layer (52) covers an entire transmissive area.
Regarding claim 7, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the cathode patterning material (51) is disposed on a top surface of a single recessed region of the at least one recessed region (see fig. 2).
Regarding claim 8, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the cathode patterning material (51) includes at least one recessed region that corresponds to the at least one recessed region of the transmissive layer (see fig. 2), and wherein the capping layer (52) is planar and fills in the at least one recessed region of the cathode patterning material (51).
Claim(s) 12-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (CN: 113299855 A~ hereinafter “Li”) of record in view of Choi et al. (US. Pub: 2022/0165984 A1~ hereinafter “Choi”) of record.
Regarding claim 12, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) a display device, comprising: a display panel including a light emitting area (102) and a transmissive area (101) for conveying light to a sensor disposed beneath the display panel; wherein the transmissive area (101) comprises: a transmissive layer (212) for conveying light and having a first recessed region (see fig. 2).
Li does not expressly disclose the first recessed region is disposed at a central portion of the transmissive area, wherein the first recessed region is disposed on an upper surface of the transmissive layer and does not expose a layer below the transmissive layer; and wherein the first recessed region does not penetrate through the transmissive layer.
Choi in the same field of endeavor discloses (in at least fig. 9) a first recess region (see fig. 9; i.e. the recess on top of item 180) is disposed at a central portion of the transmissive area (TA), wherein the first recess region is disposed on an upper surface of the transmissive layer (180; [0148]) and does not expose a layer below the transmissive layer (180; see at least fig. 9); and wherein the first recess region does not penetrate through the transmissive layer (180).
Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to consider arranging the first recess region of Li as taught by Choi, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art.
Regarding claim 13, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) a cathode patterning material (51) formed on the transmissive layer (212) to bond the cathode patterning material to the transmissive layer.
Regarding claim 14, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the transmissive layer (212) further comprises second recessed regions (see fig. 2) disposed at corners of the transmissive area.
Regarding claim 15, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the transmissive layer (212) further comprises third recessed regions (see fig. 2) disposed at lateral edges of the transmissive area.
Regarding claim 16, Li discloses (in at least fig. 2) a shape of the third recessed regions is the same as a shape of the second recessed regions.
Li does not expressly disclose the third recess shape is different from the second recess shape.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to consider forming the third recess and the second recess of Li with different shapes, since it has been held that a mere change of shape of a component involves only routine skill in the art.
Regarding claim 17, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the cathode patterning material (51) is formed to cover the first recessed region, but fails to disclose the cathode patterning material expose the second recessed regions.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Li such that the cathode patterning material expose the second recessed regions, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art.
Regarding claim 18, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the cathode patterning material (51) is formed to cover the first recessed region and the second recessed regions.
Regarding claim 19, Li discloses all the claimed limitations except for a size of the cathode patterning material is less than a size of the transmissive area.
However, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the display device comprised of, in part, a cathode patterning material (51) and a light transmissive area (101).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to consider forming a size of the cathode patterning material less than a size of the transmissive area, since a mere change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art.
Regarding claim 20, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) the transmissive area (101) further comprises a capping layer (52) formed over the cathode patterning material.
Claim(s) 9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (CN 113299855 A~ hereinafter “Li”) of record in view of Yoon and further in view of OH et al. (US. Pub: 2020/0273927 A1~ hereinafter “OH”) of record.
Regarding claim 9, Li as modified by Yoon does not expressly disclose a plurality of data lines oriented in a first direction; a plurality of scan lines oriented in a second direction that is different than the first direction, a scan line or a data line within the transmissive area comprises a non-linear region to bypass at least one transmissive portion.
However, Li discloses (in at least figs. 2 and 3) a plurality of data lines (28; i.e. the source lines) and a plurality of scan lines (24, 27; i.e. the gate lines) in order to address each pixel individually thus enabling precise control over the display’s image.
OH discloses (in at least figs. 3) a plurality of data lines (DL; [0087]) oriented in a first direction; a plurality of scan lines (SL; [0085]) oriented in a second direction that is different than the first direction (see at least fig. 3).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display panel of Li as modified by Yoon with the plurality of data and scan lines structure of OH, wherein a scan line or a data line within the transmissive area comprises a non-linear region to bypass at least one transmissive portion, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art.
Regarding claim 10, Li as modified by Yoon and OH discloses (in at least fig. 3 OH) a signal transmission characteristic associated with the scan line (SL) or the data line (DL) that intersects the transmissive area is different from a signal transmission characteristic associated with a scan line or a data line that does not intersect the transmissive area.
Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (CN 113299855 A~ hereinafter “Li”) of record in view of Yoon and further in view of Zhao et al. (US. Pub: 2021/0360194 A1~ hereinafter “Zhao”) of record.
Regarding claim 11, Li as modified by Yoon discloses (in at least fig. 3 Li) the transmissive area comprises a first transmissive area (101), but is silent about a second transmissive area, and wherein the first transmissive area is configured to pass more light into the display panel than the second transmissive area.
Zhao discloses (in at least figs. 1 and 2) a display panel comprised of, in part, a first transmissive area (100c) and a second transmissive area (100b), wherein the first transmissive area (100c) is configured to pass more light into the display panel than the second transmissive area (100b).
Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display panel of Li as modified by Yoon with the second transmissive area teaching of Zhao, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELMITO BREVAL whose telephone number is (571)270-3099. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th~ 7:30-5:30.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R. Greece can be reached at 571-272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
ELMITO BREVAL
Primary Examiner
Art Unit 2875
/ELMITO BREVAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875