Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/987,003

ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY FOR A VEHICLE BRAKE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY FOR A VEHICLE BRAKE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 15, 2022
Priority
Nov 17, 2021 — DE 102021129955.1
Examiner
LANE, NICHOLAS J
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
ZF Friedrichshafen AG
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
616 granted / 936 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
975
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 936 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Newly submitted claims 12-14 and 20 are directed to an invention that is independent or distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons: Newly amended claim 12 and original claim 12 are related as combination and subcombination. Inventions in this relationship are distinct if it can be shown that (1) the combination as claimed does not require the particulars of the subcombination as claimed for patentability, and (2) that the subcombination has utility by itself or in other combinations (MPEP § 806.05(c)). In the instant case, the combination as claimed does not require the particulars of the subcombination as claimed because original claim 12 was directed toward a method of manufacturing an actuator assembly comprising a drive assembly comprising a carrier assembly on which an electric motor, a spindle drive and a gear unit are mounted and a control assembly comprising a partition panel and a circuit board fastened to the partition panel whereas newly amended claim 12 has deleted this subject matter. Original claim 12 has separate utility such as assembling a drive assembly comprising a carrier assembly on which an electric motor, a spindle drive and a gear unit are mounted and a control assembly comprising a partition panel and a circuit board fastened to the partition panel and then providing a separate electrical connection, whereas newly amended claim 12 requires a generic drive assembly and a generic control assembly in addition to a new method step of preassembling and inserting the generic control assembly into a housing base part and simultaneously establishing an electrical connection between the circuit board and the electric motor. Furthermore, a serious search burden exists because substantial structure that was previously recited in all of the independent claims has been deleted from the claims, thereby necessitating an entirely new search in different classes and/or sub-classes in addition to a new search using different search terminology and logic. Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented invention, this invention has been constructively elected by original presentation for prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 12-20 are withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and MPEP § 821.03. To preserve a right to petition, the reply to this action must distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement. Otherwise, the election shall be treated as a final election without traverse. Traversal must be timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are subsequently added, applicant must indicate which of the subsequently added claims are readable upon the elected invention. Should applicant traverse on the ground that the inventions are not patentably distinct, applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the inventions to be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the examiner finds one of the inventions unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other invention. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the word “husing” (see line 14) is misspelled. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 and 15-19 are allowed. Regarding independent claim 1, Yasui (US 2019/0023248) is considered to be the closest prior art of record. Yasui discloses an actuator assembly for a vehicle brake (see Abstract, FIG. , comprising: a control assembly comprising a partition panel and a single circuit board fastened to the partition panel, and a drive assembly comprising a carrier assembly on which an electric motor, a spindle drive and a gear unit are mounted, wherein a driven shaft of the electric motor is aligned substantially perpendicularly to the partition panel and the circuit board, wherein the control assembly and the drive assembly are arranged in a common housing, and wherein the control assembly and the drive assembly are insertable into the housing, and wherein insertion of the control assembly into the housing establishes an electrical connection between the circuit board and at least the electric motor, without requiring additional wiring or fastening steps. Yasui, however, does not disclose that control assembly is configured as a preassembled, installable sub-unit, the control assembly comprising a partition panel and a single circuit board fastened to the partition panel prior to installation into a housing, or that the drive assembly is configured as a separate preassembled sub-unit which comprises a carrier assembly on which an electric motor, a spindle drive and a gear unit are mounted, which gear unit drivingly couples the electric motor and the spindle drive. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS J LANE whose telephone number is (571)270-5988. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at (571)272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICHOLAS J LANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 September 18, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 06, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746904
VEHICLE BRAKE ACTUATOR AND ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742487
VIBRATION ISOLATION STRUCTURE
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735017
Brake Assembly, Brake System, Vehicle, and Brake System Control Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729735
POSITIONING ASSEMBLY AND BRAKE PISTON ASSEMBLY
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715412
BRAKE DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 936 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month