Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/987,326

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ONCOMING TRAFFIC WARNING AT A WORK ZONE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 15, 2022
Priority
Nov 16, 2021 — provisional 63/279,712
Examiner
COURSON, TANIA C
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Site 2020 Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
600 granted / 924 resolved
-3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
944
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
70.4%
+30.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A Request for Continued Examination (RCE) under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 30 March 2026 (RCE) has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to Claim(s) 1-21 have been considered but are moot because the new grounds of rejection are based on amendment(s) to the Claim(s). With respect to independent Claim(s) 1: In response to applicant's argument that Fairweather et al. (US 11257340 B2) does not disclose “a tapered cylindrical body” and “wherein to initiate a pairing process with the motion sensor, the first and second radio modules share data according to an authentication process” , the examiner disagrees. Fairweather does teach the new claim language as demonstrated below. Status Independent Claim(s) 1 has/have been amended in the RCE filed 30 March 2026. Claim(s) 7-8 is/are canceled. A Non Final Rejection is being issued in this paper with regards to Claim(s) 1-6 and 9-21. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 9-12 and 19-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fairweather et al. (US 11257340 B2, see reference in its entirety). With respect to independent Claim 1, Fairweather disclose(s): A system for traffic warning at a road construction work zone (Figs. 6, 7A, 8E & 10A-C) comprising: at least one motion sensor (Fig. 6; motion sensor 516 in detection unit 402) shaped to fit into an opening in at least one traffic cone (see annotated Fig. 7A below; motion sensor 516 in detection unit 402 fits into an opening in the traffic cone 552) comprising a first radio module (Fig. 6 and col. 9 lines 42-49 and col. 22 lines 36-38: 532) and associated with the at least one traffic cone proximate the road construction work zone for transmitting laser pulses in a direction of oncoming traffic and detecting reflected laser pulses from the oncoming traffic and in response transmitting an alert signal (Fig. 6 & 7A & 10A-C and column 10, lines 57-61; cone 552 is used in Figs. 10A-C which shows the proximity to road construction work zone and sensor 516 transmits may transmit laser pulses in the direction of oncoming traffic and detects reflected laser pulses from oncoming traffic and in response transmits alert signals 536 & 538 ); and a portable alert unit comprising a second radio module (col. 7 lines 40-46 and col. 22 lines 36-38) and configured to: in response to an activation of the portable alert unit, initiate a pairing process with the motion sensor; receive the alert signal from the motion sensor; and generate a warning of the oncoming traffic (Figs. 6 & 8E and column 11, lines 33-46 and column 12, line 66 through column 13, line 3; activation of the portable alert unit 412 is configured to initiate communication with the detection unit which includes the motion sensor 516 and the portable alert unit 412 is configured to receive the alert signal and generate a warning of the oncoming traffic); and wherein the motion sensor includes a tapered cylindrical body portion adapted to fit into the opening and a head portion that forms a plug for the opening (see annotated Fig. 5G & Fig. 7A below), wherein to initiate a pairing process with the motion sensor, the first and second radio modules share data according to an authentication process (col. 23 line 57 through col. 24 line 3). PNG media_image1.png 948 1080 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 399 375 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to Claim 2, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 1. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the at least one motion sensor transmits said alert signal to the portable alert unit using radio communication (Fig. 6 and column 22, lines 5-15). With respect to Claim 3, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 2. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the radio communication is via long range low- power wide-area network modulation and/or Class 1 radio (Fig. 6 and column 22, lines 5-15). With respect to Claim 4, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 1. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the portable alert unit includes at least one of a speaker, lights and internal vibrator/shaker for generating said warning (Fig. 6; audio alert 536 & visual alert 538). With respect to Claim 6, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 1. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the portable alert unit includes an actuator for activating initiation of communication with the at least one motion sensor (Fig. 5F; actuator 508 for actuating motion sensor 516). With respect to Claim 9, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 1. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the head portion includes indicia indicating direction of the transmitted laser pulse to assist placement of the at least one motion sensor for detecting the oncoming traffic (Fig. 7B; indicia indicating direction 512 of the transmitted laser pulse). With respect to Claim 10, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 1. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the portable alert unit includes a processor connected to a packet radio controller and at least one of a speaker, lights and a vibrator/shaker for causing the portable alert unit to vibrate (Figs. 8F-G; processor 820 and packet radio controller 822 and lights 806). With respect to Claim 11, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 10. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the packet radio controller is activated by a switch for initiating communication with the motion sensor via the second radio module and an antenna (Fig. 8G and column 9, lines 42-52; packet radio controller 822 is activated by a switch via processor 820 for initiating communication with the motion sensor 516 via the second radio module and an antenna). With respect to Claim 12, Fairweather teach(es) the system of Claim 10. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the lights comprise a multi-colour LED display (Fig. 8F and column 24, lines 41-61; multi-colour LED lights 806). With respect to Claim(s) 19, Fairweather disclose(s) a method of operating the system of Claim 1. Fairweather further disclose(s): a method of operating by pairing the portable alert unit and at least one motion sensor; activating the at least one motion sensor to transmit laser pulses in a direction defined by a lens; receiving the reflected laser pulse from the oncoming traffic; calculating distance of the oncoming traffic; transmitting an alert to the portable alert unit; and generating an alarm of the oncoming traffic at the portable alert unit (Figs. 5E, 6, 7A & 8F and column 9, lines 7-17; portable alert unit 412 and motion sensor 516 in detection unit 402 are paired; motion sensor 516 transmits laser pulses by a lens of 510; receives the reflected laser pulse from oncoming traffic and generates an alarm at the portable alert unit 412 ). With respect to Claim(s) 20, Fairweather disclose(s) the method of Claim 19. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein calculating distance of the oncoming traffic comprises calculating the amount of time that each transmitted laser pulse is reflected back from the oncoming traffic and calculating therefrom the distance between the oncoming traffic and the at least one motion sensor (column 9, lines 7-17 and lines 49-52; distance may be calculated by the transmitted laser pulse reflected back from oncoming traffic for the distance between the oncoming traffic and the motion sensor 516 in detection unit 402). With respect to Claim(s) 21, Fairweather disclose(s) the method of Claim 20. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the alert is transmitted to the portable alert unit in the event that the distance is less than a threshold (column 10, lines 22-37; the alert transmitted to the portable alert unit 412 in the event the distance is less than a threshold is compared to predetermined threshold data). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 and 13-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fairweather et al. in view of Yifrach (US 2012/0222611 A1, see reference in its entirety). Regarding Claim(s) 5, Fairweather disclose(s) the system of Claim 1. Fairweather does not specifically disclose: wherein the at least one motion sensor includes a LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor. However, Yifrach disclose(s) a system (Fig. 1) including: wherein the at least one motion sensor includes a LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor (Fig. 1 and paragraph [0108]; motion sensor is a LIDAR detector). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Fairweather, with the teachings of Yifrach, for the purpose of allowing increase in accuracy of measurement and analysis (Paragraphs [0075-76]). Regarding Claim(s) 13, Fairweather disclose(s) the system of Claim 1. Fairweather further disclose(s): wherein the motion sensor includes a processor connected to the first radio module having an antenna (Fig. 8G and column 9, lines 42-52; processor 820 connected to the motion sensor 516 via the first radio module and antenna). Fairweather does not specifically disclose: a LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor. However, Yifrach disclose(s) a system (Fig. 1) including: a LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensor (Fig. 1 and paragraph [0108]; motion sensor is a LIDAR detector). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Fairweather, with the teachings of Yifrach, for the purpose of allowing increase in accuracy of measurement and analysis (Paragraphs [0075-76]). Regarding Claim(s) 14, Fairweather and Yifrach disclose(s) the system of Claim 13. The combination does not specifically disclose: wherein the LIDAR sensor comprises a transmitter, a receiver, a transmitting lens, a receiving lens, and a timer and analog-to-digital (A/D) converter. However, Yifrach further disclose(s): wherein the LIDAR sensor comprises a transmitter, a receiver, a transmitting lens, a receiving lens, and a timer and analog-to-digital (A/D) converter (Fig. 1 and paragraph [0108]; motion sensor is LIDAR detector which is understood to use a transmitter, a receiver transmitting and receiving lenses, a timer and A/D converter s to emit the laser pulses). Motivation to combine is the same as Claim 13. Regarding Claim(s) 15, Fairweather and Yifrach disclose(s) the system of Claim 13. The combination does not specifically disclose: wherein the LIDAR sensor comprises a transmitter for transmitting the laser pulses, a transmitting lens for directing the laser pulse toward the oncoming traffic, a receiver and a receiving lens for detecting the reflected laser pulses from the direction of the oncoming traffic. However, Yifrach further disclose(s): wherein the LIDAR sensor comprises a transmitter for transmitting the laser pulses, a transmitting lens for directing the laser pulse toward the oncoming traffic, a receiver and a receiving lens for detecting the reflected laser pulses from the direction of the oncoming traffic (Fig. 1 and paragraph [0108]; LIDAR detector is understood to use transmitters via transmitting lenses to emit the laser pulses and receivers with receiving lens to detect laser pulses). Motivation to combine is the same as Claim 13. Regarding Claim(s) 16, Fairweather and Yifrach disclose(s) the system of Claim 15. The combination does not specifically disclose: wherein the transmitter comprises a laser diode. However, Yifrach further disclose(s): wherein the transmitter comprises a laser diode (Fig. 1 and paragraph [0108]; LIDAR detector is understood to use transmitters via transmitting lenses to emit the laser pulses via a laser diode). Motivation to combine is the same as Claim 13. Regarding Claim(s) 17, Fairweather and Yifrach disclose(s) the system of Claim 15. The combination does not specifically disclose: wherein the receiver comprises a photodiode. However, Yifrach further disclose(s): wherein the receiver comprises a photodiode (Fig. 1 and paragraph [0108]; LIDAR detector is understood to use photodiodes). Motivation to combine is the same as Claim 13. Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fairweather et al. and Yifrach further in view of Pandit et al. (WO 2021/003201 A1, see reference in its entirety). Regarding Claim(s) 18, Fairweather and Yifrach disclose(s) the system of Claim 13. The combination does not specifically disclose(s): wherein the LIDAR sensor includes a timer and analog-to- digital (A/D) converter for calculating the amount of time that each transmitted laser pulse is reflected back to the receiver to calculate the distance between the oncoming traffic and the at least one motion sensor. However, Pandit disclose(s) a system (Fig. 1) including: wherein the LIDAR sensor includes a timer and analog-to- digital (A/D) converter for calculating the amount of time that each transmitted laser pulse is reflected back to the receiver to calculate the distance between the oncoming traffic and the at least one motion sensor (Fig. 1 and paragraphs [0041] & [0042]; LIDAR 130 includes a timer and an A/D converter for calculating transmitted laser pulses to calculate distance between oncoming traffic and the sensor). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the combined system of Fairweather and Yifrach, with the teachings of Pandit, for the purpose of rendering information quickly (Paragraph [00122]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following reference(s) relate(s) to traffic warning systems having radio modules: Selevan US 10922987 B2); Toman (US 5552767); Selevan et al. (US 12277845 B2); Souza (US 6288651 B1); Nelson et al. (US 7030777 B1). The following reference(s) relate(s) to traffic warning systems having tapered cylindrical body portions: Klein et al. (US 8631755 B2); Huang (US 8698647 B2). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TANIA COURSON whose telephone number is (571)272-2239. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (7am-3:30pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Deherrera can be reached at (303)297-4237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TC/ 11 June 2026 /KRISTINA M DEHERRERA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 28, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 29, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667878
DIGITAL ROLL GAP VERIFICATION TOOL AND RELATED CALIBRATION STAND
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654482
Reader and Page Guide
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649196
ALIGNMENT TOOL FOR A SOLDER MACHINE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12636567
MECHANICAL PICKLEBALL SCOREKEEPER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12600491
PUSH BUTTON MOTION INDICATOR MECHANISM
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+27.5%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month