Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 17/989,092

Modular Spread Bar Device with Stiffening Truss

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 17, 2022
Examiner
VU, STEPHEN A
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
909 granted / 1113 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1135
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1113 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by FR 3109935 A1. FR 3109935 A1 discloses a spread bar device (2), as illustrated in Figures 1-9, for suspending a load from a crane (see second paragraph on page 3 of FR 3109935 A1 - English Translation) using a lifting harness (6) having a plurality of attachment cables (11), the device comprising a main beam section (12) (interpreted to be the left beam section 12) which extends in a longitudinal direction of the main beam section; at least one secondary beam section (12) (interpreted to be the right beam section 12) which extends in a respective longitudinal direction of the secondary beam section (see Figures 6-7); a beam coupling arrangement (25) (see Figures 6-7) associated with said at least one secondary beam section so as to be arranged to releasably couple (slider 27 and the yoke 26 are provided so that the slider can slide in the yoke – see second paragraph on page 4 of FR 3109935 A1 - English Translation) the secondary beam section to one end of the main beam section such that the longitudinal direction of the secondary beam section is aligned with the longitudinal direction of the main beam section; and a plurality of cable anchors (15) supported on the main beam section and said at least one secondary beam section so as to be arranged for connection to the attachment cables of the lifting harness respectively; the cable anchors being positioned on the beam sections so as to be arranged to both (i) suspend the main beam section from the lifting harness when the main beam section is separated from said at least one secondary beam section and (ii) suspend the main beam section and said at least one secondary beam section from the lifting harness when the main beam section is coupled to said at least one secondary beam section. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Khachaturian (US 7,066,343). Khachaturian discloses a spread bar device (10B), as illustrated in Figures 4-6, for suspending a load (23) from a crane (see col. 5, line 44) using a lifting harness having a plurality of attachment cables (48), the device comprising a central beam assembly (19) defining a singular beam extending in a longitudinal direction of the central beam assembly; a plurality of cable anchors (see Figure 5 and annotated Figure 6 below) supported on the central beam assembly so as to be arranged for connection to the attachment cables of the lifting harness respectively; and at least one truss frame (15,16) extending laterally outwardly from the central beam assembly so as to provide resistance to lateral bending of the central beam assembly. PNG media_image1.png 389 522 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-16 and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Parker, Mario, Morgan, Owens, and Moore are cited as being relevant art, because each prior art discloses a spread bar device comprising a beam section and a beam coupling arrangement. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN VU whose telephone number is (571)272-1961. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 am - 4:30 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Victoria Augustine can be reached at (313)446-4858. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEPHEN VU Primary Examiner Art Unit 3651 /STEPHEN A VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 17, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600026
MAGNETIC CLEANING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598955
SUBSTRATE TRANSFER DEVICE AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594678
Device and Method for Gripping an Object
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589509
VACUUM SUCTION CYLINDER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583132
ROBOTIC ARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+15.6%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1113 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month