Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/990,720

CELLULOSIC PARTICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 20, 2022
Examiner
LE, HOA T
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp.
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
785 granted / 1080 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1125
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1080 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Election/Restrictions Claims 9-13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was treated as being made without traverse in the Office Action mailed February 15, 2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1-3 and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being anticipated by JP-2022-011187 (“JP’187”)1 Claim 1: JP’187 teaches a cellulosic particle comprising a main component being cellulosic and a second component being the cellulosic particle may be treated with a second component (B) being an aromatic compound having a long aliphatic group and at least one of a phenolic hydroxyl group and a monoglycidyl ether group directly bound to the aromatic group (JP’187, abstract); wherein the long chain aliphatic group is C10-C20 (paragraph 0056), which is within the claimed range of C8-C20 aliphatic group. Thus component (B) of JP’187 is equivalent to the claimed second component (B). Due to the nature of the aromatic group directly bonded to the phenolic hydroxyl group, the cellulosic particles inherently form a sea-island structure because of the specific structure of the aromatic compound (B). This sea-island formation is admitted by Applicant as disclosed in the instant specifricaiton at paragraphs 0013 and 0038. In particular, JP’187 discloses the specific claimed formula CDN-2 (JP’187, paragraph 0084). Claims 2-3: JP’187 exemplifies the mass ratio of second component to first component (B/A) being 30% (page 54, Table 1), which results in (B/(A+B)) being 30/130 or about 74% of first component and 26% of second component in the total of first and second components, which is well within the claimed ranges of 70% to 95% for first component and 5% to 30% for second component. Claims 14-15: JP’187 teaches inclusion of external additives including silica particle (para. 0122). Claim 16: JP’187 teaches cellulosic particle having a volume-average particle diameter of the cellulosic particles within the claimed range which is 3 µm to 10 µm (Table 3, samples RPC-9, -12, -16 and -20. Claim 17: JP’187 teaches cellulosic particle having a geometric standard deviation by number GSDv being from 1.0 to 1.7 (Table 3). Claims 18-20: Although JP’187 does not report the sphericity or the number average molecular weight of the cellulosic particle, it is deemed inherent because the cellulosic particle comprises the same components within the same proportions and of the same formula as claimed as discussed in claims 1-3 above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1, 5-6 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP’187 in view of JP-2022/22947 (“JP’947”), Abe (JP-6872068 or US-2023/0303782)2 in view of AUDOUSSET (US-2009/0151089). Claim 1: JP’187 teaches the claimed cellulosic particle as discussed above. JP’187 teaches additional components without the specific fatty acid derivatives (A) or acrylic acid (C) as claimed. However, JP’947 teaches a cellulosic particle comprising cellulose as the main component and additional components including an aromatic compound as defined in the claimed aromatic component (B) and a fatty acid derivatives as defined in the claimed component (A) (JP’947, para. 0032-0033; para. 0066; para. 0111-0112) along with component (C), (meth)acrylic compound (JP’947, para. 0014 and 0143). Therefore, the POSITA would be motivated to include just one component (B) as taught by JP’187 or all three components (A), (B), (C) as taught by JP’947. Claims 5-6: Andoussett teaches cellulose modified with a fatty acid including fatty acid amide including ethanolamine as equivalent (para. 0044, 0052 and 0056-0061). Therefore, it would have been obvious as matter of choice to include fatty acid ethanolamine as the modifying fatty acid. Amines are known to have an Kow of 5-8. Claim 18: Abe teaches the cellulosic particle has a sphericity of at least 0.95 (Abe, Page 9, Table 1) which meets the claimed range of at least 0.90. Claim 19: Abe teaches forming cellulose by saponification of cellulose acetate in polyvinyl alcohol (Abe, Examples 1-3); Cellulose acetate has an average molecular weight (MW) of 30,000 and polyvinyl alcohol has an average MW of at least 85,000; thus, the resulted cellulose would necessarily have an average MW of above 37,000. In addition, JP’947 teaches one component having an average molecular weight of up to 80,000 (para. 0133), and thus the cellulosic particle would have the MW within the claimed range which is at least 37,000. Claim 20: Abe teaches the cellulosic particle having a surface smoothness of at least 92% (Abe, Page 9, Table 1) which meets claimed range of at least 80%. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to instant claims 1-3, 5-6 and 14-20 have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejections discussed above. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOA (Holly) LE whose telephone number is (571)272-1511. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HOA (Holly) LE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /HOA (Holly) LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 1 Copy provided by Applicant. 2 ) [Note: The US publication is used as the English translation for JP-6872068
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 11, 2024
Interview Requested
Apr 24, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 24, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
May 15, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 12, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 25, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 16, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599965
NANOMETRIC COPPER FORMULATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589929
RECYCLABLE BLANKS AND CONTAINERS MADE THEREFROM HAVING CONTROLLED FLUID PERMEABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576611
Nonwoven Fabrics Suitable for Medical Applications
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569885
POWER PLANT BOILER SAND COMPRISING DISCARDED FOUNDRY SAND, USE OF POWER PLANT BOILER SAND, METHOD FOR PRODUCING POWER PLANT BOILER SAND AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING POWER PLANT BOILER SAND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569814
SUPER-WET SURFACE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+13.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1080 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month