Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 17/993,818

BEVERAGE CONTAINER PACKAGING

Final Rejection §102§112§Other
Filed
Nov 23, 2022
Priority
Nov 24, 2021 — provisional 63/282,980
Examiner
POON, ROBERT
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Acorn West LLC
OA Round
4 (Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allowance Rate
400 granted / 952 resolved
-28.0% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1021
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 952 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 6-13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the scope of the claims is unclear as to whether applicant is claiming the combination of the packing assembly and the thermo pack or whether applicant is claiming the subcombination of the packing assembly capable of functioning with a thermos pack. For purposes of examination, claims will be treated as directed towards the subcombination; however, clarification of the scope of the claims is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-13, as best understood, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 2021/0139215 to Gilligan et al. (Gilligan). Regarding claim 1, Gilligan discloses a beverage container packing assembly (Fig 1) comprising a bottom tray (200), comprising one or more first support columns (204) and defining a plurality of first compartments (202), wherein each of the first compartments are configured to receive a first portion of a beverage container therein, a center support (106), defining a plurality of through holes and comprising a first thermos pack accommodating space (between first and second row or first and second column of through holes, €0005) configured to receive at least a portion of a thermos pack therein, wherein each of the plurality of through holes is configured to receive a second portion of a beverage container (abstract), a top tray (104, 1400) defining a plurality of second compartments (1406), wherein each of the second compartments are configured to receive a third portion of a beverage container therein, wherein the top tray is configured to accommodate the thermo pack between a first row of second compartments and a second row of second compartments (abstract) since it has the structure as recited, wherein the top tray (1400) includes at least one second thermo pack accommodating space (A, Fig 14 below) comprising a plurality of vertical posts (1402, 1404) forming a boundary of the second thermo pack accommodating space, the second thermo pack accommodating space being configured to receive a portion of a thermos pack as recited since it has the structure as recited, wherein the first and second thermos pack accommodating space are positioned relative to one another such that when the top tray is placed on center support, a thermos pack can be at least partially received within both accommodating depending on the dimensions and orientation of the thermopack. In particular, Gilligan discloses space between vertical posts that can serve as accommodating space. Furthermore, the first and second thermos pack accommodating space correspond in one or more of size, location, and orientation in that both accommodating spaces are located within the outer perimeter of the top tray and center support and oriented upwards. PNG media_image1.png 658 638 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Gilligan discloses top tray configured to accommodate the thermo pack such that the pack extends between a plurality of beverage containers installed in the first row and plurality of beverage containers installed in second row (abstract) since it has the structure as recited. Regarding claim 3, Gilligan further discloses both thermo pack accommodating space comprising a surface to accommodate thermo pack (Fig 14). Regarding claim 4, Gilligan further discloses top tray comprising the second thermo pack accommodating space that can house a thermo pack between first and second row of second compartments (Fig 14). Regarding claim 6, Gilligan further discloses the plurality of vertical posts (1402, 1404) configured to contact thermo pack since it has the structure as recited. Regarding claim 7, as best understood, Gilligan further discloses plurality of vertical posts capable of contacting a thermo pack as recited since it has the structure as recited. Regarding claim 8, Gilligan further discloses a thermo pack capable of being installed in the accommodating space as recited since Gilligan discloses the top tray having the structure as recited. Regarding claim 9, Gilligan further discloses packing assembly configured so that bottom tray (200), center support (106), and top tray (104) are configured to be disposed in a shipping container (€0009). Regarding claim 10, Gilligan further discloses the bottom tray (200), center support (106), top tray (104) capable of extending to inner surface of the shipping container (Figs 21-22) since it has structure as recited. Regarding claim 11, Gilligan further discloses bottom tray (200), center support (106), top tray (104) comprise molded paper pulp (€0010). Regarding claim 12, Gilligan further discloses bottom tray (200), center support (106), top tray (104) comprise a water-resistant coating (€0010). Regarding claim 13, Gilligan further discloses center support (106) defines a through hole corresponding to first compartments (202) (abstract). Claim(s) 1, as best understood, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 2019/0100347 to Carrier et al. (Carrier). Regarding claim 1, Carrier discloses a beverage container packing assembly (Fig 1) comprising a bottom tray (100), comprising one or more first support columns (140) and defining a plurality of first compartments (110), wherein each of the first compartments are configured to receive a first portion of a beverage container therein, a center support (200), defining a plurality of through holes (210) and comprising a first thermos pack accoomodating space (230) configured to receive a thermo pack in a first thermos pack, wherein each of the plurality of through holes (210) is configured to receive a second portion of a beverage container (400, Fig 8), a top tray (300) defining a plurality of second compartments (310), wherein each of the second compartments are configured to receive a third portion of a beverage container (400) therein (Fig 8), wherein the top tray (300) is configured to accommodate the thermo pack between a first row of second compartments and a second row of second compartments (Figs 8-9) since it has the structure as recited, wherein the top tray (300) includes at least a second thermo pack accommodating space (A, Fig 10 below) comprising a plurality of vertical posts (B) forming a boundary of the thermo pack accommodating space, the second thermos pack accommodating space capable of receiving a portion of a thermos pack, wherein the first and second thermos pack accommodating space are positioned relative to one another such that when the top tray is placed on center support, a thermos pack can be at least partially received within both accommodating depending on the dimensions and orientation of the thermos pack. In particular, Carrier discloses space between vertical posts that can serve as accommodating space. Furthermore, the first and second thermos pack accommodating space correspond in one or more of size, location, and orientation in that both accommodating spaces are located within the outer perimeter of the top tray and center support and oriented upwards. PNG media_image2.png 708 627 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim(s) 1, as best understood, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 2012/0037529 to Hall. Regarding claim 1, Hall discloses a beverage container packing assembly (Fig 1) comprising a bottom tray (102), comprising one or more first support columns (130) and defining a plurality of first compartments (116), wherein each of the first compartments (116) are configured to receive a first portion of a beverage container therein, a center support (106), defining a plurality of through holes (114) and comprising a first thermos pack accommodating space (114 center) configured to receive a portion of a thermos pack, wherein each of the plurality of through holes is configured to receive a second portion of a beverage container (108, Fig 3), a top tray (104) defining a plurality of second compartments (158), wherein each of the second compartments are configured to receive a third portion of a beverage container (108) therein (Fig 1), wherein the top tray (104) is configured to accommodate the thermo pack between a first row of second compartments and a second row of second compartments (Fig 1) since it has the structure as recited, wherein the top tray (104) includes at least a second thermo pack accommodating space (A, Fig 7 below) comprising a plurality of vertical posts (170) forming a boundary of the thermo pack accommodating space, the second thermo pack accommodating space configured to receive a portion of a thermos pack therein, wherein the first and second thermos pack accommodating space are positioned relative to one another such that when the top tray is placed on center support, a thermo pack can be at least partially received within both accommodating depending on the dimensions and orientation of the thermos pack. In particular, Hall discloses space between vertical posts that can serve as accommodating space. Furthermore, the first and second thermos pack accommodating space correspond in one or more of size, location, and orientation in that both accommodating spaces are located within the outer perimeter of the top tray and center support and oriented upwards. PNG media_image3.png 524 781 media_image3.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/30/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Initially, it is noted that applicant does not argue the rejection of the dependent claims. Applicant argues that none of the prior art teach an accommodating space in both center support and top tray positioned relative to one another such that a thermo pack is at least partially received within both spaces. This is not persuasive because so long as prior art has the structure of first and second accommodating spaces, then they would be capable of functioning with a thermo pack as recited depending on the shape, dimensions, positioning and orientation of the thermo pack to be used with the packaging. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT POON whose telephone number is (571)270-7425. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday, 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571)272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT POON/ Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Oct 18, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §Other
Feb 18, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §Other
Aug 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §Other
Apr 30, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727695
LID-MOUNTED FOOD AND CONDIMENT HOLDER
6y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729033
Modular Tray and Tray Assemblies Therefrom
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729031
CAN BODY
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727428
WAFER CONTAINER, TOP COVER THEREOF, AND METHOD FOR MANAGING WAFER CONTAINERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715648
Thin-Walled Metal Cup
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+27.1%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 952 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month