DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/26/2025 has been entered.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1-4, 6-13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Regarding claim 1, the scope of the claims is unclear with the recitation of the term “correspond”. In particular, it is not clear how the accommodating spaces correspond because there is no technical definition for such a term. The metes and bounds of the claim are not properly defined and thus the recitation renders the scope of the claims unclear.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-4, 6-13, as best understood, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 2021/0139215 to Gilligan et al. (Gilligan).
Regarding claim 1, Gilligan discloses a beverage container packing assembly (Fig 1) comprising a bottom tray (200), comprising one or more first support columns (204) and defining a plurality of first compartments (202), wherein each of the first compartments are configured to receive a first portion of a beverage container therein, a center support (106), defining a plurality of through holes and configured to accommodate a thermo pack (abstract) in a first thermo pack accommodating space (between a first row and second row, abstract), wherein each of the plurality of through holes is configured to receive a second portion of a beverage container (abstract), a top tray (104, 1400) defining a plurality of second compartments (1406), wherein each of the second compartments are configured to receive a third portion of a beverage container therein, wherein the top tray is configured to accommodate the thermo pack between a first row of second compartments and a second row of second compartments (abstract) since it has the structure as recited, wherein the top tray (1400) includes at least one second thermo pack accommodating space (A, Fig 14 below) comprising a plurality of vertical posts (1402, 1404) forming a boundary of the second thermo pack accommodating space. In particular, Gilligan discloses space between vertical posts that can serve as accommodating space. Furthermore, the first and second thermos pack accommodating space correspond in one or more of size, location, and orientation in that both accommodating spaces are located within the outer perimeter of the top tray and center support and oriented upwards.
PNG
media_image1.png
658
638
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Regarding claim 2, Gilligan discloses top tray configured to accommodate the thermo pack such that the pack extends between a plurality of beverage containers installed in the first row and plurality of beverage containers installed in second row (abstract) since it has the structure as recited.
Regarding claim 3, Gilligan further discloses both thermo pack accommodating space comprising a surface to accommodate thermo pack (Fig 14).
Regarding claim 4, Gilligan further discloses top tray comprising the second thermo pack accommodating space that can house a thermo pack between first and second row of second compartments (Fig 14).
Regarding claim 6, Gilligan further discloses the plurality of vertical posts (1402, 1404) configured to contact thermo pack since it has the structure as recited.
Regarding claim 7, as best understood, Gilligan further discloses plurality of vertical posts capable of contacting a thermo pack as recited since it has the structure as recited.
Regarding claim 8, Gilligan further discloses a thermo pack capable of being installed in the accommodating space as recited since Gilligan discloses the top tray having the structure as recited.
Regarding claim 9, Gilligan further discloses packing assembly configured so that bottom tray (200), center support (106), and top tray (104) are configured to be disposed in a shipping container (€0009).
Regarding claim 10, Gilligan further discloses the bottom tray (200), center support (106), top tray (104) capable of extending to inner surface of the shipping container (Figs 21-22) since it has structure as recited.
Regarding claim 11, Gilligan further discloses bottom tray (200), center support (106), top tray (104) comprise molded paper pulp (€0010).
Regarding claim 12, Gilligan further discloses bottom tray (200), center support (106), top tray (104) comprise a water-resistant coating (€0010).
Regarding claim 13, Gilligan further discloses center support (106) defines a through hole corresponding to first compartments (202) (abstract).
Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 2019/0100347 to Carrier et al. (Carrier).
Regarding claim 1, Carrier discloses a beverage container packing assembly (Fig 1) comprising a bottom tray (100), comprising one or more first support columns (140) and defining a plurality of first compartments (110), wherein each of the first compartments are configured to receive a first portion of a beverage container therein, a center support (200), defining a plurality of through holes (210) and configured to accommodate a thermo pack in a first thermos pack accommodating space (at 230), wherein each of the plurality of through holes (210) is configured to receive a second portion of a beverage container (400, Fig 8), a top tray (300) defining a plurality of second compartments (310), wherein each of the second compartments are configured to receive a third portion of a beverage container (400) therein (Fig 8), wherein the top tray (300) is configured to accommodate the thermo pack between a first row of second compartments and a second row of second compartments (Figs 8-9) since it has the structure as recited, wherein the top tray (300) includes at least one thermo pack accommodating space (A, Fig 10 below) comprising a plurality of vertical posts (B) forming a boundary of the thermo pack accommodating space. In particular, Carrier discloses space between vertical posts that can serve as accommodating space. Furthermore, the first and second thermos pack accommodating space correspond in one or more of size, location, and orientation in that both accommodating spaces are located within the outer perimeter of the top tray and center support and oriented upwards.
PNG
media_image2.png
708
627
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by US 2012/0037529 to Hall.
Regarding claim 1, Hall discloses a beverage container packing assembly (Fig 1) comprising a bottom tray (102), comprising one or more first support columns (130) and defining a plurality of first compartments (116), wherein each of the first compartments (116) are configured to receive a first portion of a beverage container therein, a center support (106), defining a plurality of through holes (114) and configured to accommodate a thermo pack in a first thermopack accommodating space (114 center), wherein each of the plurality of through holes is configured to receive a second portion of a beverage container (108, Fig 3), a top tray (104) defining a plurality of second compartments (158), wherein each of the second compartments are configured to receive a third portion of a beverage container (108) therein (Fig 1), wherein the top tray (104) is configured to accommodate the thermo pack between a first row of second compartments and a second row of second compartments (Fig 1) since it has the structure as recited, wherein the top tray (104) includes at least one thermo pack accommodating space (A, Fig 7 below) comprising a plurality of vertical posts (170) forming a boundary of the thermo pack accommodating space. In particular, Hall discloses space between vertical posts that can serve as accommodating space. Furthermore, the first and second thermos pack accommodating space correspond in one or more of size, location, and orientation in that both accommodating spaces are located within the outer perimeter of the top tray and center support and oriented upwards.
PNG
media_image3.png
524
781
media_image3.png
Greyscale
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 8/6/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Initially, it is noted that applicant does not argue the rejection of the dependent claims. Applicant argues that prior art does not teach the first accommodating space and second accommodating space correspond in one or more of size, location and orientation. This is not persuasive because both spaces are located within the perimeter of the center support and top tray respectively and thus correspond to each other.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT POON whose telephone number is (571)270-7425. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday, 8:30 am to 6:00 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571)272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ROBERT POON/ Examiner, Art Unit 3735