Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/993,894

SIGNAL INTEGRATION SYSTEM AND CAPACITIVE TOUCH CONTROL DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 24, 2022
Examiner
MARINELLI, PATRICK
Art Unit
2699
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Pixart Imaging Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
493 granted / 776 resolved
+1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1, 5, 11, 15, and 21 have been amended, and Claims 6, 9, 10, 12, 16, 19, 20 have been cancelled. Claims 1-5, 7, 8, 11, 13-15, 17, 18, and 21 are pending and prosecuted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mu et al., US Patent Publication 2012/0320385, in further view of Brosnan et al., US Patent Publication 2010/0302208, and in further view of Han, US Patent Publication 2017/0336910, and in further view of He et al., US Patent Publication 2021/0318782, henceforth known as He, and in further view of Lin et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0026534, henceforth known as Lin, in further view of Han et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0197288, henceforth known as Han ‘288. Regarding Claim 1, Mu discloses a signal integration system (Abstract; An optical navigation module with capacitive sensor), comprising: an optical finger navigation (OFN) device, configured to sense images of a finger to generate OFN sensing data (Figure 1; [0020-0021]; an optical finger navigation module 102 for sensing relative movement of a tracking surface 104); and a capacitive touch control circuit configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor (Figure 1C; [0024]; a capacitive sensor array 138 is connected to a capacitive sensor control circuitry 132, that is used for receiving touch sensing data, that can be imbedded in an IC 112 or in the controller 132 of the OFN module 102). However, Mu doesn’t explicitly disclose a capacitive touch control circuit, configured to receive the OFN sensing data, configured to generate first control signals for a capacitive touch sensor, and configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor; wherein the capacitive touch control circuit integrates the OFN sensing data and a touch sensing result corresponding to the touch sensing data to output integrated data; wherein the OFN device is a fingerprint sensing device and is configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Brosnan et al., US Patent Publication 2010/0302208, teaches wherein an optical finger navigation device can be operated in a optical navigation mode and a fingerprint imaging mode ([0039]). It would have bene obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the disclosure of Mu to further include the teachings of Brosnan in order to provide wherein the optical finger navigation module is used for both fingerprint sensing and for optical navigation. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Brosnan teaches an optical finger navigation device can be operated in a optical navigation mode and a fingerprint imaging mode (Brosnan: [0039]). However, Mu and Brosnan doesn’t explicitly teach a capacitive touch control circuit, configured to receive the OFN sensing data, configured to generate first control signals for a capacitive touch sensor, and configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor; wherein the capacitive touch control circuit integrates the OFN sensing data and a touch sensing result corresponding to the touch sensing data to output integrated data, wherein the OFN device is configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Han, US Patent Publication 2017/0336910, teaches the use of a read-out IC that is used to control a fingerprint/touch sensor, by providing both fingerprint driving signals and a plurality of touch driving signals, and receives touch signals and fingerprint signals that have been sensed. The read-out IC integrated the touch sensing signals and the fingerprint sensing signals and converts the integrated analog signals into digital signals and outputs the digital signals to a fingerprint/touch controller FTC that can recognized a touch point and recognize a registered fingerprint ([0022-0026]; [0064];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date the of claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu and Brosnan to further include the teachings of Han in order to provide a capacitive touch control circuit, configured to receive the OFN sensing data, configured to generate first control signals for a capacitive touch sensor, and configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor; wherein the capacitive touch control circuit integrates the OFN sensing data and a touch sensing result corresponding to the touch sensing data to output integrated data. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Han teaches the use of a read-out IC that is connected to both a fingerprint and capacitive touch sensor, integrated the signals from these sensors, and outputs them to an FTC that can recognize a touch point and registered fingerprint (Han: [0064];). However, the combination of Mu, Brosnan, and Han doesn’t explicitly teach the capacitive control circuit configured to generate first control signals for a capacitive touch sensor, wherein the OFN device is configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. He et al., US Patent Publication 2021/0318782, teaches an apparatus with fingerprint recognition and touch detection. Where apparatus 100 is operated in a fingerprint sensing mode so as to recognize a fingerprint of a user, thereby determining authentication of the user. Then, in step 1200 of the method 1000, the apparatus 100 determines whether authentication of the user is passed. When the authentication of the user is passed, the step 1300 is performed. When the authentication of the user is failed, the step 1200 is performed again to recognize the fingerprint of a user. In step 1300 of the method 1000, the apparatus 100 is operated in the touch sensing mode so as to recognize the touch event, such that the apparatus 100 performs cursor control by recognizing the touch event (Figure 3; [0048-0049];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, and Han to further include the teachings of He such that the optical finger navigation module detects a fingerprint to authenticate a user and, in response to the authentication, controls the operation of the touch sensing to recognize a touch event in order to provide the capacitive control circuit configured to generate first control signals for a capacitive touch sensor. The motivation to combine these arts is because He teaches wherein authentication of a user through fingerprint sensing is needed in order to operate in a touch sensing mode (He: [0048-0049];). However, the combination of Mu, Brosnan, Han, and He doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the OFN device is configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Lin et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0026534, teaches a fingerprint sensing device that can be an optical fingerprint sensing device includes an encryption unit that is utilized for encrypting fingerprint data that is detected by the fingerprint sensing device to generate encrypted data and transmitting it (Figure 2; [0012];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, Han, and He to further include the teachings of Lin in order to provide wherein the OFN device is configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is provide encrypted fingerprint data to be prevent it from being stolen (Lin: [0003];). However, the combination of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, and Lin doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Han et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0197288 discloses a sensor 105 used for encrypted fingerprint data that it detects and provides it to an application processor 120. However, application processor 120 is unable to decrypt the fingerprint data, so the application processor 120 provides the encrypted fingerprint data to a secure enclave processor 122, which decrypts the fingerprint data and searches for a match in a template library 214 (Figure 1; [0031]; [0034-0035];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed inventions, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, and Lin to further include the teachings of Han in order to provide wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. The motivation to combine these arts is to utilize an a secure enclave processor that is used for decrypting fingerprint data to determine a fingerprint match (Han: [0034-0035];) Regarding Claim 21, Mu discloses a capacitive touch control device (Abstract; An optical navigation module with capacitive sensor), comprising: a capacitive touch sensor (Figure 1C; [0024]; a capacitive sensor array 138) an optical finger navigation (OFN) device, configured to sense images of a finger to generate OFN sensing data (Figure 1; [0020-0021]; an optical finger navigation module 102 for sensing relative movement of a tracking surface 104); and a control circuit configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor (Figure 1C; [0024]; a capacitive sensor array 138 is connected to a capacitive sensor control circuitry 132, that is used for receiving touch sensing data, that can be imbedded in an IC 112 or in the controller 132 of the OFN module 102). However, Mu doesn’t explicitly disclose a control circuit, configured to receive the OFN sensing data, configured to generate first control signals for the capacitive touch sensor, and configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor; wherein the control circuit integrates the OFN sensing data and a touch sensing result corresponding to the touch sensing data to output integrated data; wherein the OFN device is a fingerprint sensing device configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Brosnan et al., US Patent Publication 2010/0302208, teaches wherein an optical finger navigation device can be operated in a optical navigation mode and a fingerprint imaging mode ([0039]). It would have bene obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the disclosure of Mu to further include the teachings of Brosnan in order to provide wherein the optical finger navigation module is used for both fingerprint sensing and for optical navigation. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Brosnan teaches an optical finger navigation device can be operated in a optical navigation mode and a fingerprint imaging mode (Brosnan: [0039]). However, Mu and Brosnan doesn’t explicitly teach a control circuit, configured to receive the OFN sensing data, configured to generate first control signals for the capacitive touch sensor, and configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor; wherein the control circuit integrates the OFN sensing data and a touch sensing result corresponding to the touch sensing data to output integrated data, wherein the OFN device is a fingerprint sensing device configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Han, US Patent Publication 2017/0336910, teaches the use of a read-out IC that is used to control a fingerprint/touch sensor, by providing both fingerprint driving signals and a plurality of touch driving signals, and receives touch signals and fingerprint signals that have been sensed. The read-out IC integrated the touch sensing signals and the fingerprint sensing signals and converts the integrated analog signals into digital signals and outputs the digital signals to a fingerprint/touch controller FTC that can recognized a touch point and recognize a registered fingerprint ([0022-0026]; [0064];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date the of claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu and Brosnan to further include the teachings of Han in order to provide a control circuit, configured to receive the OFN sensing data, configured to generate first control signals for the capacitive touch sensor, and configured to receive touch sensing data from the capacitive touch sensor; wherein the control circuit integrates the OFN sensing data and a touch sensing result corresponding to the touch sensing data to output integrated data. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Han teaches the use of a read-out IC that is connected to both a fingerprint and capacitive touch sensor, integrated the signals from these sensors, and outputs them to an FTC that can recognize a touch point and registered fingerprint (Han: [0064];). However, the combination of Mu, Brosnan, and Han doesn’t explicitly teach the control circuit configured to generate first control signals for the capacitive touch sensor, wherein the OFN device is a fingerprint sensing device configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. He et al., US Patent Publication 2021/0318782, teaches an apparatus with fingerprint recognition and touch detection. Where apparatus 100 is operated in a fingerprint sensing mode so as to recognize a fingerprint of a user, thereby determining authentication of the user. Then, in step 1200 of the method 1000, the apparatus 100 determines whether authentication of the user is passed. When the authentication of the user is passed, the step 1300 is performed. When the authentication of the user is failed, the step 1200 is performed again to recognize the fingerprint of a user. In step 1300 of the method 1000, the apparatus 100 is operated in the touch sensing mode so as to recognize the touch event, such that the apparatus 100 performs cursor control by recognizing the touch event (Figure 3; [0048-0049];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, and Han to further include the teachings of He such that the optical finger navigation module detects a fingerprint to authenticate a user and, in response to the authentication, controls the operation of the touch sensing to recognize a touch event in order to provide the capacitive control circuit configured to generate first control signals for the capacitive touch sensor. The motivation to combine these arts is because He teaches wherein authentication of a user through fingerprint sensing is needed in order to operate in a touch sensing mode (He: [0048-0049];). However, the combination of Mu, Brosnan, Han, and He doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the OFN device is a fingerprint sensing device configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint, wherein the control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Lin et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0026534, teaches a fingerprint sensing device that can be an optical fingerprint sensing device includes an encryption unit that is utilized for encrypting fingerprint data that is detected by the fingerprint sensing device to generate encrypted data and transmitting it (Figure 2; [0012];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, Han, and He to further include the teachings of Lin in order to provide wherein the OFN device is configured to encrypt the fingerprint to generate an encrypted fingerprint. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is provide encrypted fingerprint data to be prevent it from being stolen (Lin: [0003];). However, the combination of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, and Lin doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. Han et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0197288 discloses a sensor 105 used for encrypted fingerprint data that it detects and provides it to an application processor 120. However, application processor 120 is unable to decrypt the fingerprint data, so the application processor 120 provides the encrypted fingerprint data to a secure enclave processor 122, which decrypts the fingerprint data and searches for a match in a template library 214 (Figure 1; [0031]; [0034-0035];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed inventions, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, and Lin to further include the teachings of Han in order to provide wherein the control circuit is connected to an auxiliary control circuit which decrypts the encrypted fingerprint. The motivation to combine these arts is to utilize an a secure enclave processor that is used for decrypting fingerprint data to determine a fingerprint match (Han: [0034-0035];) Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mu et al., US Patent Publication 2012/0320385, in further view of Brosnan et al., US Patent Publication 2010/0302208, and in further view of Han, US Patent Publication 2017/0336910, and in further view of He et al., US Patent Publication 2021/0318782, henceforth known as He, and in further view of Lin et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0026534, henceforth known as Lin, in further view of Han et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0197288, henceforth known as Han ‘288, and in further view of Frame et al., US Patent Publication 2016/0117048, henceforth known as Frame. Regarding Claim 4, The combination of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, Lin, and Han ‘288 doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the signal integration system is in a conveyance, wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to other electronic devices of the conveyance via a first communication interface. Frame et al., US Patent Publication 2016/0117048, discloses the use of a OFN system with capacitive sensing, that requires support for a communication interface 150, and that is used as part of a control console of a vehicle that needs to communicate with a higher level control system, which in turn controls other functions ([0023]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, Lin, and Han ‘288 to further include the teachings of Frame in order to provide wherein the signal integration system is in a conveyance, wherein the capacitive touch control circuit is connected to other electronic devices of the conveyance via a first communication interface. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Frame teaches than an OFN system can be used as part of a control console of a vehicle (Frame: [0023];) Claim 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mu et al., US Patent Publication 2012/0320385, in further view of Brosnan et al., US Patent Publication 2010/0302208, and in further view of Han, US Patent Publication 2017/0336910, and in further view of He et al., US Patent Publication 2021/0318782, henceforth known as He, and in further view of Lin et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0026534, henceforth known as Lin, in further view of Han et al., US Patent Publication 2019/0197288, henceforth known as Han ‘288,in view of Frame et al., US Patent Publication 2016/0117048, henceforth known as Frame, in further view of Duenninger et al., US Patent Publication 2015/0371794, henceforth known a Duenninger. Regarding Claim 7, The combination of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, Lin, and Han ‘288 doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the signal integration system is provided in a steering wheel of a conveyance. Frame et al., US Patent Publication 2016/0117048, discloses the use of a OFN system with capacitive sensing, that requires support for a communication interface 150, and that is used as part of a control console of a vehicle that needs to communicate with a higher level control system, which in turn controls other functions ([0023]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, Lin, and Han ‘288 to further include the teachings of Frame. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Frame teaches than an OFN system can be used as part of a control console of a vehicle (Frame: [0023];) However, the combination of Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, Lin, Han ‘288, and Frame doesn’t explicitly teach wherein the signal integration system is provided in a steering wheel of a conveyance. Duenninger et al., US Patent Publication 2015/0371794, teaches an optical finger navigation module (OFN) can be integrated as a sensor for the detection of finger movements in the switch block of a motor vehicle steering wheel ([0003];). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the combinational disclosure Mu, Brosnan, Han, He, Lin, Han ‘288, and Frame to further include the teachings of Duenninger in order to provide wherein the signal integration system is provided in a steering wheel of a conveyance. The motivation to combine these analogous arts is because Duenninger teaches that an optical finger navigation module can be integrated in a motor vehicle steering wheel (Duenninger: [0003];). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 3, 5, and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 11, 13-15, 17 and 18 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2/3/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-5, 7, 8, 11, 13-15, 17, 18, and 21 have been fully considered, but they are directed to claims as amended, and therefore are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection presented above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK F MARINELLI whose telephone number is (571)270-3383. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00AM - 5:00PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, George Eng can be reached at (571)-272-7495. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK F MARINELLI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 24, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 22, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 03, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596403
SLIDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591270
COMPUTING DEVICE CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591299
METHOD, SERVER AND DEVICE FOR OUTPUTTING XR CONTENT CORRESPONDING TO A TARGET WITHIN A CONSTRUCTION SITE BASED ON VOICE RECOGNITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586502
INTEGRATED DRIVING DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586500
COMPENSATION CIRCUIT FOR STRETCHABLE DISPLAY AND STRETCHABLE DISPLAY INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month