Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/994,491

LIGHT ACCESSORY DEVICE FOR A BREAST PUMP OR THE LIKE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 28, 2022
Examiner
FREDRICKSON, COURTNEY B
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Lactalite LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
289 granted / 384 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
432
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 384 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 16, 2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment This office action is responsive to the amendment filed on February 9, 2025. As directed by the amendment: claims 1, 11, 14-16, and 18 have been amended and claims 7 and 20 have been cancelled. Thus, claims 1, 3, 8, 9, 11, 15, 16, and 18 are presently pending in this application. Applicant’s amendments to the Specification, Drawings, and Claims have overcome each and every objection previously set forth in the Final Office Action mailed December 16, 2025. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed February 9, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) have been fully considered and are persuasive, specifically in regards to Sun not teaching or disclosing the light source is configured to direct light towards the clip structure when extended. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Applicant’s amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 3, 8, 16, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claims 1 and 16, the claim has been amended to recite “the light source selectively directs light from the end portion of the housing towards the clip structure when extended from the housing”. The disclosure as originally filed does not provide sufficient support for the light source to direct light towards the clip structure. The specification provides support for the light source to be configured to direct light towards the neck, the breast shield, or another component of the breast pump (paragraph 24). However, there is no disclosure in the specification of the light being directed towards the clip structure. Applicant argues that support for the amendment is found in figs. 1-3 of the drawings. The examiner notes that the drawings shows light source 26 as positioned at the top of the housing and would direct light upward. The clip structure 28 is coupled to the back of the housing and moves parallel with the longitudinal axis of the housing (fig.3). Thus, it seems that the light would direct light in a direction parallel to the clip structure and not towards the clip structure, as recited in the amended claims. As such, it is the examiner’s opinion that the amendment is drawn to new matter. Claims 3, 8, and 18 are also rejected by virtue of being dependent on claims 1 or 16. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 8, 16, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Buzza (US 3814927). Regarding claim 1, Buzza discloses a light accessory device couplable to a neck of a breast shield assembly for a breast pump (fig. 10 shows a light device which is capable of coupling to a neck of a breast shield since the specifics of the shield are not further claimed), the light accessory device comprising: a housing (shield 20A with cage 24A in fig. 10 form the “housing”; the examiner notes that Merriam-Webster defines “housing” as “something that covers or protects”; the shield 20A and cage 24A cover and protect the lamp 15); a clip structure (hook 31C in fig. 10) coupled to and extensible from the housing (fig. 10 shows the clip structure can slide along the shield 20A to move to an extended position shown in phantom lines) and adapted to selectively couple the housing to the neck of the breast shield assembly (the hook is capable of connecting to a neck of a breast shield), wherein the clip structure is coupled to a slider that is configured to translate along a length of the housing such that the clip structure is translatably extensible from an end portion of the housing (base block 31E in fig. 10 slides along rod 50 to move the hook 31C to an extended position shown in phantom lines); and a light source disposed within the housing (lamp 15 in fig. 10) and positionable adjacent to the neck of the breast shield assembly (the lamp is capable of being moved to a position where the lamp is adjacent to the neck of a breast shield) such that the light source selectively directs light from the end portion of the housing towards the clip structure when extended from the housing and into the neck of the breast shield assembly (a portion of the light from lamp 15 would be directed upwards and would illuminate a portion of the clip structure and the neck of the breast shield since the cage portion of the housing comprises open spaces at the top of the housing). Regarding claim 3, Buzza discloses the slider is translatably coupled to a track or rail structure disposed at a back portion of the housing (rod 50 in fig. 10 is equated to the claimed “rail” and is disposed at a back portion since the back portion is not further defined). Regarding claim 8, Buzza discloses the clip structure comprises one of a split ring and a full ring adapted to be selectively disposed circumferentially about the neck of the breast shield assembly (hook 31C in fig. 10 is a split ring). Regarding claim 16, Buzza discloses a method of providing a light accessory device couplable to a neck of a breast shield assembly for a breast pump (fig. 10 shows a light device which is capable of coupling to a neck of a breast shield since the specifics of the shield are not further claimed), the method comprising: providing a housing (shield 20A with cage 24A in fig. 10 form the “housing”; the examiner notes that Merriam-Webster defines “housing” as “something that covers or protects”; the shield 20A and cage 24A cover and protect the lamp 15); providing a clip structure (hook 31C in fig. 10) coupled to and extensible from the housing (fig. 10 shows the clip structure can slide along the shield 20A to move to an extended position shown in phantom lines) and adapted to selectively couple the housing to the neck of the breast shield assembly (the hook is capable of connecting to a neck of a breast shield), wherein the clip structure is coupled to a slider that is configured to translate along a length of the housing such that the clip structure is translatably extensible from an end portion of the housing (base block 31E in fig. 10 slides along rod 50 to move the hook 31C to an extended position shown in phantom lines); and providing a light source disposed within the housing (lamp 15 in fig. 10) and positionable adjacent to the neck of the breast shield assembly (the lamp is capable of being moved to a position where the lamp is adjacent to the neck of a breast shield) such that the light source selectively directs light from the end portion of the housing towards the clip structure when extended from the housing and into the neck of the breast shield assembly (a portion of the light from lamp 15 would be directed upwards and would illuminate a portion of the clip structure and the neck of the breast shield since the cage portion of the housing comprises open spaces at the top of the housing). The examiner notes that the claimed method is directed towards the steps of "providing" the claimed components and not towards the step of using the components in conjunction with a breast shield assembly. Regarding claim 18, Buzza discloses the slider is translatably coupled to a track or rail structure disposed at a back portion of the housing (rod 50 in fig. 10 is equated to the claimed “rail” and is disposed at a back portion since the back portion is not further defined). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9, 11, 14, and 15 are allowed over the prior art of record. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The claims in this application are allowed because the prior art of record fails to disclose either singly or in combination the claimed breast shield assembly. See Reasons for Allowance provided in the Final Rejection mailed on 12/16/2026. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COURTNEY FREDRICKSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7481. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9 AM - 5 PM EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BHISMA MEHTA can be reached at 571-272-3383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COURTNEY FREDRICKSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Nov 04, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Feb 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12576258
Infusion Pump Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576193
BREAST PUMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564704
INTRALUMINAL DEVICE WITH LOOPED CORE WIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12544104
SUBCUTANEOUS DEVICE WITH LEAK PREVENTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12533011
MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 384 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month