Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/995,225

TOCILIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF VIRAL INFECTIONS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 30, 2022
Examiner
NICKOL, GARY B
Art Unit
1643
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The University of Chicago
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
32%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
51%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 32% of cases
32%
Career Allow Rate
15 granted / 47 resolved
-28.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
82
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 47 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election to the claims of Group I (Claims 1, 3, 6-7, 9, 12-15, 18, 20, 24, 26 and 28) in the reply filed on 08/11/2025 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claim Status Claims 1, 3, 6-7, 9, 12-15, 18, 20, 24, 26 and 28 are the only claims pending and currently under consideration. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Page 11, line 27 refers to “Ref. 17: incorporated by reference in its entirety”. Page 11, last line refers to “Ref. 18”. However, the specification on the last page only lists references 1-15 and thus it’s unclear what reference 17 and 18 denote. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 6-7, 9, 12-15, 18, 20, 24, 26, and 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bao et al., WO 2021/194860, priority to March 23, 2020. As to claims 1, and 12-15, Bao et al. teach a method of treating a subject infected with SARS-CoV-2 comprising administering an effective dose of 200mg or less of tocilizumab to the subject. See page 6. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes Covid-19. According to one embodiment, tocilizumab subcutaneous (sc) formulation delivers “162 mg” tocilizumab (page 23, line 25). As to claims 12-15, the above encompasses treating an upper respiratory infection arising from a virus as the virus SARS-CoV-2 infects lung cells. As to claim 3, Bao et al. teach (page 24, lines 9+) that the subject to be treated can have “severe”, or “critical”, or “moderate” or “moderate-severe” Covid-19. While the claimed term “mild” is not specifically taught, these are relative terms and one could reasonably equate mild with moderate and “moderate-severe” with some degree of moderate disease. As to claims 6-7, and 9, Bao et al teach that the subject can exhibit symptoms and/or biomarkers of respiratory inflammation. This can include “cytokine release syndrome” (CRS) such as elevated IL-6 levels. The patient can have “severe pneumonia” (page 8) which can morph to “acute respiratory distress syndrome”. Typically, these patients can have severe dyspnea, respiratory distress, and tachypnea. Patients experiencing these conditions are exhibiting symptoms of respiratory inflammation or undergoing a “systemic inflammatory response”, “systemic hyperinflammation” and CRS. A patient suffering from severe pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 would encompass those that can suffer systemic hyperinflammation which manifests as respiratory and or pulmonary inflammation. See Bao et al. page 8, line 21. In one embodiment, the patient has respiratory distress (RR≥30 breaths/minute). In one embodiment, the patient has >50% lesions in pulmonary imaging. As to claim 18, 20, and 24, Bao et al. teach that tocilizumab can be administered subcutaneously or intravenously (see page 23, lines 9-25). As to claim 18, the reference refers to weight-based dosing of tocilizumab which is 8mg/kg. Assuming the treated subject might be a toddler or preschooler weighing a max of approximately 12kg (26.5 lbs.) then the maximum dose of tocilizumab would be 96mg. Bao et al. also teach that the subject can be administered “multiple doses” (page 24, line 24). Thus, if the same toddler or preschooler was given a second dose of 96 mg, this would be a total dose of less than 400 mg of tocilizumab. As to claims 26 and 28, Bao et al. teach that the tocilizumab can be co-administered with anti-viral agents including remdesivir (see page 11, line 4, page 26, lines 21-35, also see page 37) or corticosteroids (page 11, line 9, page 27, lines 1-10) such as prednisone or hydrocortisone. Corticosteroids can act as immunosuppressants or anti-inflammatory agents. No claim is allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY B NICKOL whose telephone number is (571)272-0835. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patricia Mallarli can be reached at 571-272-4729. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY B NICKOL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599620
METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME USING AN INHIBITORY OR CYTOTOXIC AGENT AGAINST PLASMA CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577286
T CELL RECEPTORS WHICH RECOGNIZE MUTATED EGFR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12534538
ANTI-HER2 BINDING MOLECULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12492251
HUMAN BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER TARGETING ANTIBODIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 11827670
ANTI-CfaE ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 28, 2023
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
32%
Grant Probability
51%
With Interview (+18.9%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 47 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month