Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/995,646

TECHNIQUES FOR UPDATING DEFAULT BEAMS AND PATHLOSS REFERENCE SIGNALS IN A MULTI-COMPONENT CARRIER COMMUNICATION LINK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 06, 2022
Priority
Jun 05, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2020094508
Examiner
RAHMAN, SHAH M
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
399 granted / 491 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
540
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
60.6%
+20.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 491 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/15/2026 has been entered. Status of the Claims Based to the Applicant’s REMARKS and Amendment filed on 06/03/2026 for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114 filed on 06/15/2026, this office action considers - Claims 1-4, 7-8, 11-22, 25-26, 29-39 and 55-58 are pending; and Claims 5-6, 9-10, 23-24, 27-28, 40-54, and 59-72 are canceled. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments and remarks, filed 03/05/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-4, 7-8, 11-22, 25-26, 29-39 and 55-58 has been considered to be persuasive. Accordingly previous rejection under 35 US 103 by Go in view Zhang is withdrawn. However, after further search and consideration a new rejection under 35 USC 102 as anticipated by Zhang is made for independent claims 1, 19, 37 and 55. Please see Section 6 presented below. Dependent claims are rejected for the same reason as above. NOTICE for all US Patent Applications filed on or after March 16, 2013 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 19-21, 37-39 and 55-57 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (US 20220279460 A1, of record, hereinafter ‘ZHANG’). Regarding claim 1, ZHANG teaches a method of wireless communication performed by a user equipment (UE) (Fig. 3 UE 106, or Fig. 7A UE 106), receiving, via radio resource control (RRC) signaling, configuration information indicating that the UE is configured to identify a default uplink beam or a default pathloss reference signal (PL RS) ( Fig. 14, [0120] At 1402, a UE, such as UE 106, may determine whether a pathloss reference signal (RS) has been configured in a component carrier (CC). In some embodiments, the determination may be responsive to the UE determining that spatial relationship information for a default transmission beam has not been configured by a base station, such as base station 102 and/or gNB 604, serving the UE. [0121] At 1404, the UE may determine the default beam for transmissions based, at least in part, on the (configured) pathloss RS. In some embodiments, the determination may be responsive to determining that the pathloss RS has been configured in the CC. In some embodiments, the default beam for transmissions may be determined based, at least in part, on a beam used for a first, last, or indicated pathloss RS in a pathloss RS list. In some embodiments, the pathloss RS list may be configured via radio resource control (RRC) signaling with the base station. (Construed a base station, using RRC signalling, may configure a UE with a list of PL RS for a CC, and to a determine an indicated PS RS in the list as the default PL RS for determining a default transmission beam for the CC)); identifying one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for a first component carrier of a communication link ( Fig. 14 1404, [0121] the determination may be responsive to determining that the pathloss RS has been configured in the CC. In some embodiments, the default beam for transmissions may be determined based, at least in part, on a beam used for a first, last, or indicated pathloss RS in a pathloss RS list. (Construed determining a default uplink beam for a first component carrier based on a indicated or default beam) See also [0122] the UE may determine the default beam for transmissions based, at least in part, on a default transmission beam in another CC (Construed that another CC is a first component carrier)); and transmitting a communication via a second component carrier of the communication link, wherein transmitting the communication via the second component carrier is based at least in part on application of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS to a second component carrier of the communication link, wherein the application of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS is based at least in part on the second component carrier having no currently indicated PL RS or spatial relation ( [0122] In some embodiments, responsive to determining that the pathloss RS has not been configured in the CC, the UE may determine whether any control resource sets (CORESETs) and/or transmission configuration indication (TCI) states for a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) in the CC have been configured by the base station. In some embodiments, responsive to determining that no CORESESTs and/or TCI states have been configured in the CC, the UE may determine the default beam for transmissions based, at least in part, on a default transmission beam in another CC. [0125] responsive to determining that the pathloss RS has not been configured in the CC, the UE the UE may determine whether any control resource sets (CORESETs) and/or transmission configuration indication (TCI) states for a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) in the CC have been configured by the base station. In some embodiments, responsive to determining that no CORESESTs and/or TCI states have been configured in the CC, the UE may determine a pathloss RS for power control for a dedicated physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) or a sounding reference signal (SRS) based, at least in part, on … a pathloss RS used for a most recent transmission on a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) ….. in a CC in a same band as the CC. See also Fig. 13 1306 [Wingdings font/0xE8] No [Wingdings font/0xE8] 1308 [Wingdings font/0xE8] No [Wingdings font/0xE8] 1314). Regarding claim 19, the claim is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 1 and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Regarding claim 37, the claim is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 1 and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Regarding claim 55, the claim is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 1 and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Regarding claim 2, ZHANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein application of the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS to the second component carrier of the communication link is based at least in part on the second component carrier being indicated within an uplink component carrier list that indicates to apply the one or more of the default uplink beam or the PL RS to the second component carrier of the communication link ( See [0121] the default beam for transmissions may be determined based, at least in part, on a beam used for a first, last, or indicated pathloss RS in a pathloss RS list… [0125] responsive to determining that the pathloss RS has not been configured in the CC, …. the UE may determine a pathloss RS on … a pathloss RS used for a most recent transmission on a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) ….. in a CC in a same band as the CC.). Regarding claim 3, ZHANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier of the communication link are based at least in part on one or more of: a first reference signal associated with a control resource set of a lowest control resource set identification, or a second reference signal associated with an active physical downlink shared channel ( [0123] In some embodiments, to determine the default beam for transmissions based, at least in part, on a default transmission beam in another CC, the UE may determine the default beam for transmissions based, at least in part, on a default physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) beam or a CORESET beam configured in another CC. See also Fig. 13, 1308 [Wingdings font/0xE8] Yes [Wingdings font/0xE8] 1310). Regarding claim 20, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 2. Regarding claim 21, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 3. Regarding claim 38, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 2. Regarding claim 39, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 3. Regarding claim 56, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 2. Regarding claim 57, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 4, 11-14, 16, 17, 22, 29-32, 34, 35 and 58 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 20220279460 A1, of record, hereinafter ‘ZHANG’) in view of Go et al. (US 20230189250 A1, with priority of us-provisional-application US 63029549, of record, hereinafter ‘GO’). Regarding claim 4, ZHANG teaches the method of claim 3. ZHANG does not explicitly teach wherein the first reference signal comprises a quasi-co-location (QCL) TypeD reference signal of a first transmission configuration indicator (TCI) or QCL of a control resource set that has a lowest control resource set identification, or wherein the second reference signal comprises a QCL TypeD reference signal of a second TCI or QCL of an active physical downlink shared channel TCI identification. In an analogous art, GO, in view of ZHANG, teaches the method of claim 3, wherein the first reference signal comprises a quasi-co-location (QCL) TypeD reference signal of a first transmission configuration indicator (TCI) or QCL of a control resource set that has a lowest control resource set identification, or wherein the second reference signal comprises a QCL TypeD reference signal of a second TCI or QCL of an active physical downlink shared channel TCI identification ( [0278] iv) At least when a pathloss RS is not configured by RRC, a default spatial relation for a dedicated-PUCCH/SRS may be determined as follows. [0279] When CORESET(s) are configured on a CC, a TCI state/QCL assumption of a CORESET having the lowest ID (a PL RS to be used is a QCL-TypeD RS of the same TCI state/QCL assumption of a CORESET having the lowest ID and a PL RS may be a periodic RS), or [0280] When a CORESET is not configured on a CC, an activated TCI state having the lowest ID which may be applied to a PDSCH in an activated DL-BWP of a CC). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 11, ZHANG teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the communication link includes a multiple transmission and reception point (TRP) communication link with a multiple downlink control information (DCI) configuration or a single DCI configuration ( [0007] LTE defines a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) as a UL channel shared by all devices (user equipment, UE) in a radio cell to transmit user data to the network. The scheduling for all UEs is under control of the LTE base station (enhanced Node B, or eNB). The eNB uses the uplink scheduling grant (DCI format 0) to inform the UE about resource block (RB) assignment. [0054] In some embodiments, base station 102A may be a next generation base station, e.g., a 5G New Radio (5G NR) base station, or “gNB”. In some embodiments, a gNB may be connected to a legacy evolved packet core (EPC) network and/or to a NR core (NRC) network. In addition, a gNB cell may include one or more transition and reception points (TRPs). In addition, a UE capable of operating according to 5G NR may be connected to one or more TRPs within one or more gNBs.). ZHANG does not explicitly disclose wherein application of the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS to a second component carrier is based at least in part on the first component carrier and the second component carrier being associated with a same TRP. GO teaches wherein the communication link includes a multiple transmission and reception point (TRP) communication link with a multiple downlink control information (DCI) configuration or a single DCI configuration ( [0330] Hereinafter, examples of multiple DCI based uplink transmission and single DCI based uplink transmission are described. Embodiment 1-2-1 [0331] When MTRP uplink transmission is performed based on multiple DCI, based on a CORESET group to which a CORESET belongs that DCI scheduling/triggering/indicating/configuring uplink transmission is received/monitored, a terminal may recognize a TRP for which corresponding uplink transmission heads. [0332] It assumes a case in which a specific CORESET (or a specific CORESET group) and a specific TRP (or TO) are associated/mapped. [0333] For example, for uplink transmission like a PUSCH/an aperiodic (AP)-SRS, based on a CORESET (or a CORESET group) in which DCI scheduling a PUSCH or triggering an AP-SRS is received/monitored, a terminal may recognize a TRP/TO to which target uplink transmission corresponds. [0336] In this case, a default spatial parameter and a default PL RS of specific uplink transmission for each TRP/TO may be determined based on one or more of i) a specific CORESET in a CORESET group associated with/configured for each TRP/TO, or ii) a specific CORESET configured for a specific cell among cell(s) configured for each TRP/TO. [0338] In addition, cell(s) configured for each TRP/TO may be cell(s) that a different CORESET group (or a CORESET pool having a different index) is configured together and/or cell(s) related to a CORESET group associated with/configured for a corresponding TRP/TO. In other words, one or more cells configured for each TRP/TO may be related to a different CORESET or may be related to the same CORESET. [0339] For example, a specific cell may be a cell having the lowest ID. Embodiment 1-2-2 [0358] When MTRP uplink transmission is performed based on single DCI, a spatial parameter may be preconfigured for each TRP/TO and a terminal may configure/assume a default spatial parameter/a default PL RS based on a preconfigured spatial parameter. [0361] Alternatively, one SRI/UL-TCI field may be included in DCI (i.e., single DCI) for scheduling/triggering/indicating MTRP uplink transmission. In this case, one SRI/UL-TCI field may indicate one codepoint among a plurality of codepoints and each of a plurality of codepoints may include one or a plurality of spatial parameters. In other words, N transmission beams for N TOs/towards N TRPs may be indicated through one SRI/UL-TCI field. One codepoint may link/connect a reference RS (e.g., a DL RS/an UL RS) for N transmission beams (in a form of an ordered pair) through a higher layer (e.g., a RRC/a MAC CE) configuration/description. [0374] If a CORESET is not configured in a corresponding CC/BWP (that MTRP uplink transmission is performed), a terminal may utilize a transmission and reception beam reference DL RS/UL RS of 2 or more TCI states corresponding to a codepoint of the lowest index among one or more codepoint candidates related to a TCI field of DL grant DCI as a default spatial parameter/a default PL RS in a CC/a BWP scheduling corresponding uplink transmission. [0376] Even when a TO that a single-panel terminal performs MTRP uplink transmission is TDM-ed, the above-described examples may be also applied to a configuration/an assumption of a default spatial parameter/a default PL RS for uplink transmission for each TRP/TO.), and wherein application of the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS to a second component carrier is based at least in part on the first component carrier and the second component carrier being associated with a same TRP ([0321] When specific uplink transmission of a multi-panel terminal (e.g., a dedicated-PUCCH, a dedicated-SRS, a PUSCH (e.g., a PUSCH scheduled by fallback DCI (e.g., DCI format 0_0) which does not include spatial parameter indication information)) is for STRP transmission, a terminal may configure/assume a default spatial parameter and a default PL RS of corresponding uplink transmission a terminal may configure/assume a default spatial parameter and a default PL RS of corresponding uplink transmission as the same one spatial parameter and the same one PL RS for all (transmission) panels.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 12, ZHANG, in view of GO, teaches the method of claim 11. ZHANG does not explicitly disclose wherein identification of the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier of the communication link comprises one or more of: identifying the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier of the communication link based at least in part on a first quasi-co-location (QCL) TypeD reference signal of a first transmission configuration indicator (TCI) or QCL that has a lowest control resource set identification of component carriers associated with the same TRP, or identifying the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier of the communication link based at least in part on a second QCL TypeD reference signal of a second TCI or QCL of an active physical downlink shared channel associated with the same TRP. GO teaches wherein identification of the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier of the communication link comprises one or more of: identifying the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier of the communication link based at least in part on a first quasi-co-location (QCL) TypeD reference signal of a first transmission configuration indicator (TCI) or QCL that has a lowest control resource set identification of component carriers associated with the same TRP, or identifying the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier of the communication link based at least in part on a second QCL TypeD reference signal of a second TCI or QCL of an active physical downlink shared channel associated with the same TRP ( ([0279] When CORESET(s) are configured on a CC, a TCI state/QCL assumption of a CORESET having the lowest ID (a PL RS to be used is a QCL-TypeD RS of the same TCI state/QCL assumption of a CORESET having the lowest ID and a PL RS may be a periodic RS), or [0280] When a CORESET is not configured on a CC, an activated TCI state having the lowest ID which may be applied to a PDSCH in an activated DL-BWP of a CC [0281] It may apply at least beam correspondence to UE. [0282] It may be applied at least in case of a single TRP. [0321] When specific uplink transmission of a multi-panel terminal (e.g., a dedicated-PUCCH, a dedicated-SRS, a PUSCH (e.g., a PUSCH scheduled by fallback DCI (e.g., DCI format 0_0) which does not include spatial parameter indication information)) is for STRP transmission, a terminal may configure/assume a default spatial parameter and a default PL RS of corresponding uplink transmission a terminal may configure/assume a default spatial parameter and a default PL RS of corresponding uplink transmission as the same one spatial parameter and the same one PL RS for all (transmission) panels.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 13, ZHANG, in view of GO, teaches the method of claim 11. ZHANG does not explicitly disclose wherein the communication link includes the single DCI configuration, and wherein identification of the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier comprises: identifying the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier based at least in part on a QCL TypeD reference signal of a single TCI state of multiple TCI states that are mapped to a same TCI codepoint. GO teaches wherein the communication link includes the single DCI configuration ([0358] When MTRP uplink transmission is performed based on single DCI, a spatial parameter may be preconfigured for each TRP/TO and a terminal may configure/assume a default spatial parameter/a default PL RS based on a preconfigured spatial parameter.), and wherein identification of the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier comprises: identifying the one or more of the default uplink beam or the default PL RS for the first component carrier based at least in part on a QCL TypeD reference signal of a single TCI state of multiple TCI states that are mapped to a same TCI codepoint ([0361] Alternatively, one SRI/UL-TCI field may be included in DCI (i.e., single DCI) for scheduling/triggering/indicating MTRP uplink transmission. In this case, one SRI/UL-TCI field may indicate one codepoint among a plurality of codepoints and each of a plurality of codepoints may include one or a plurality of spatial parameters. In other words, N transmission beams for N TOs/towards N TRPs may be indicated through one SRI/UL-TCI field. One codepoint may link/connect a reference RS (e.g., a DL RS/an UL RS) for N transmission beams (in a form of an ordered pair) through a higher layer (e.g., a RRC/a MAC CE) configuration/description. [0374] If a CORESET is not configured in a corresponding CC/BWP (that MTRP uplink transmission is performed), a terminal may utilize a transmission and reception beam reference DL RS/UL RS of 2 or more TCI states corresponding to a codepoint of the lowest index among one or more codepoint candidates related to a TCI field of DL grant DCI as a default spatial parameter/a default PL RS in a CC/a BWP scheduling corresponding uplink transmission.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 14, ZHANG, in view of GO, teaches the method of claim 13. ZHANG does not explicitly disclose wherein a TCI codepoint of the single TCI state is mapped with multiple TCI states and comprises: a lowest TCI codepoint identification among TCI codepoints mapped to the multiple TCI states, a highest TCI codepoint identification among the TCI codepoints mapped to the multiple TCI states, or a designated TCI codepoint identification of the TCI codepoints mapped to the multiple TCI states. GO teaches wherein a TCI codepoint of the single TCI state is mapped with multiple TCI states and comprises: a lowest TCI codepoint identification among TCI codepoints mapped to the multiple TCI states, a highest TCI codepoint identification among the TCI codepoints mapped to the multiple TCI states, or a designated TCI codepoint identification of the TCI codepoints mapped to the multiple TCI states ( [0374] If a CORESET is not configured in a corresponding CC/BWP (that MTRP uplink transmission is performed), a terminal may utilize a transmission and reception beam reference DL RS/UL RS of 2 or more TCI states corresponding to a codepoint of the lowest index among one or more codepoint candidates related to a TCI field of DL grant DCI as a default spatial parameter/a default PL RS in a CC/a BWP scheduling corresponding uplink transmission). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 16, ZHANG, in view of GO, teaches the method of claim 11. ZHANG does not explicitly disclose identifying a default downlink beam per TRP based at least in part on a TCI or QCL of a control resource set of a lowest control resource set identification, of the same TRP, in a most recently monitored slot, wherein the communication link includes a multiple DCI configuration. GO teaches identifying a default downlink beam per TRP based at least in part on a TCI or QCL of a control resource set of a lowest control resource set identification, of the same TRP, in a most recently monitored slot, wherein the communication link includes a multiple DCI configuration ( [0330] Hereinafter, examples of multiple DCI based uplink transmission and single DCI based uplink transmission are described. Embodiment 1-2-1 [0331] When MTRP uplink transmission is performed based on multiple DCI, based on a CORESET group to which a CORESET belongs that DCI scheduling/triggering/indicating/configuring uplink transmission is received/monitored, a terminal may recognize a TRP for which corresponding uplink transmission heads (Construed as identifying control information on in a most recently monitored slot for a TRP, wherein the communication link includes a multiple DCI configuration). [0332] It assumes a case in which a specific CORESET (or a specific CORESET group) and a specific TRP (or TO) are associated/mapped. [0333] For example, for uplink transmission like a PUSCH/an aperiodic (AP)-SRS, based on a CORESET (or a CORESET group) in which DCI scheduling a PUSCH or triggering an AP-SRS is received/monitored, a terminal may recognize a TRP/TO to which target uplink transmission corresponds. [0336] In this case, a default spatial parameter and a default PL RS of specific uplink transmission for each TRP/TO may be determined based on one or more of i) a specific CORESET in a CORESET group associated with/configured for each TRP/TO, or ii) a specific CORESET configured for a specific cell among cell(s) configured for each TRP/TO. [0338] In addition, cell(s) configured for each TRP/TO may be cell(s) that a different CORESET group (or a CORESET pool having a different index) is configured together and/or cell(s) related to a CORESET group associated with/configured for a corresponding TRP/TO. In other words, one or more cells configured for each TRP/TO may be related to a different CORESET or may be related to the same CORESET. [0339] For example, a specific cell may be a cell having the lowest ID. (Construed identifying a default downlink beam per TRP based at least in part on a TCI or QCL of a control resource set of a lowest control resource set identification)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 17, ZHANG, in view of GO, teaches the method of claim 11. ZHANG does not explicitly disclose identifying a default downlink beam per TRP based at least in part on a single TCI state of multiple TCI states that are mapped to a same TCI codepoint that has a lowest TCI codepoint identification among TCI codepoints mapped to multiple TCI states. GO teaches identifying a default downlink beam per TRP based at least in part on a single TCI state of multiple TCI states that are mapped to a same TCI codepoint that has a lowest TCI codepoint identification among TCI codepoints mapped to multiple TCI states ( [0374] If a CORESET is not configured in a corresponding CC/BWP (that MTRP uplink transmission is performed), a terminal may utilize a transmission and reception beam reference DL RS/UL RS of 2 or more TCI states corresponding to a codepoint of the lowest index among one or more codepoint candidates related to a TCI field of DL grant DCI as a default spatial parameter/a default PL RS in a CC/a BWP scheduling corresponding uplink transmission). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 22, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 4. Regarding claim 29, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 11. Regarding claim 30, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 12. Regarding claim 31, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 13. Regarding claim 32, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 14. Regarding claim 34, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 16. Regarding claim 35, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 17. Regarding claim 58, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 4. Claims 7-8 and 25-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 20220279460 A1, of record, hereinafter ‘ZHANG’)in view of Go et al. (US 20230189250 A1, with priority of us-provisional-application US 63029549, of record, hereinafter ‘GO’) and with further in view of LG Electronics (R1-1913453 “Feature lead summary#4 of Enhancements on Multi-beam Operations”, of IDS, hereinafter ‘LG’). Regarding claim 7, Zhang in view of Go, teaches the method of claim 4. ZHANG does not explicitly disclose identifying one or more of an updated uplink beam or an updated PL RS for multiple component carriers in an uplink component carrier list based at least in part on an updated TCI or QCL for a single component carrier of the multiple component carriers in a downlink component carrier list. GO teaches identifying one or more of an updated uplink beam or an updated PL RS for multiple component carriers in an uplink component carrier list based at least in part on an updated TCI or QCL for a single component carrier of the multiple component carriers in a downlink component carrier list ( [0194] In NR MIMO Rel-15, in an uplink (UL channel)/RS (e.g., PUSCH, PUCCH, SRS) of a terminal, a base station may configure a DL RS (i.e., pathloss reference RS, or pathloss RS or PL RS in short) by using an open loop power control parameter for pathloss compensation. In addition, only for a PUCCH, the pathloss RS may be updated by updating a PUCCH spatial relation information identifier (PUCCH-SpatialRelationInfoId) through a MAC control element (CE) message for each PUCCH resource. [0210] After that, in Rel-16 eNR MIMO, standardization was performed to update a pathloss RS for a PUSCH and a SRS through individual MAC CE messages. In addition, standardization was progressed to increase the number of pathloss RS pools configurable by RRC signaling from 8 to 64. This will be described in detail…… [0211] i) Pathloss reference RS for PUSCH can be activated/updated via a MAC CE… [0346] Additionally or alternatively, serving cells including CORESETPoolIndex 0 for TRP1 are cell #0, #1, #2 and 3 and among them, a serving cell having the lowest ID is cell #0. Accordingly, it may be configured/assumed that a CORESET having the lowest ID among CORESET(s) of CORESETPoolIndex 0 is used in cell #0. In addition, serving cells including CORESETPoolIndex 1 for TRP2 are cell #1 and #3 and among them, a serving cell having the lowest ID is cell #1. Accordingly, it may be configured/assumed that a CORESET having the lowest ID among CORESET(s) of CORESETPoolIndex 1 is used in cell #1. Supported in US 63029549 (Pages 90-92 Section 4.2, Page 94 Agreement, and Page 105). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam for a dedicated PUCCH and/or an SRS in a CC of ZHANG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). ZHANG and GO do not explicitly disclose identifying one or more of an updated uplink beam or an updated PL RS for multiple component carriers in an uplink component carrier list based at least in part on an updated TCI or QCL for a single component carrier of the multiple component carriers in a downlink component carrier list. In an analogous art, LG teaches identifying one or more of an updated uplink beam or an updated PL RS for multiple component carriers in an uplink component carrier list based at least in part on an updated TCI or QCL for a single component carrier of the multiple component carriers in a downlink component carrier list ( Page 16, Proposal 2: For the supported feature of the default spatial relation for dedicated-PUCCH/SRS, when pathloss RSs are configured by RRC, the default spatial relation is determined by Alt.2: following the pathloss RS (e.g., for PUCCH, the configured pathloss RS with the lowest ID is applied, and for SRS, the pathloss RS updated by MAC-CE in Rel-16 is applied) See also Page 19, Agreement@RAN1#98, Agreement@RAN1#98bis, and Pages 25-26, Agreement, presented above for claim 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of RRC provided list for configured component carriers of LG to the system of determining a default beam or PL RS for uplink transmission in a CC of ZHANG and GO in order to take the advantage of method for latency/overhead reduction across multiple CCs/BWPs determining default spatial relationship and PL RS for CC (LG: Pages 19, 25, 26 Agreements). Regarding claim 8, Zhang, in view of GO and LG, teaches the method of claim 7. ZHANG does not explicitly disclose wherein the single component carrier of the multiple component carriers in the downlink component carrier list comprises: a component carrier having a lowest control resource set identification of component carriers that are in both of the downlink component carrier list and the uplink component carrier list, a component carrier having a highest control resource set identification of component carriers that are in both of the downlink component carrier list and the uplink component carrier list, or a designated component of component carriers that are in both of the downlink component carrier list and the uplink component carrier list. GO teaches wherein the single component carrier of the multiple component carriers in the downlink component carrier list comprises: a component carrier having a lowest control resource set identification of component carriers that are in both of the downlink component carrier list and the uplink component carrier list, a component carrier having a highest control resource set identification of component carriers that are in both of the downlink component carrier list and the uplink component carrier list, or a designated component of component carriers that are in both of the downlink component carrier list and the uplink component carrier list ( [0346] Additionally or alternatively, serving cells including CORESETPoolIndex 0 for TRP1 are cell #0, #1, #2 and 3 and among them, a serving cell having the lowest ID is cell #0. Accordingly, it may be configured/assumed that a CORESET having the lowest ID among CORESET(s) of CORESETPoolIndex 0 is used in cell #0. In addition, serving cells including CORESETPoolIndex 1 for TRP2 are cell #1 and #3 and among them, a serving cell having the lowest ID is cell #1. Accordingly, it may be configured/assumed that a CORESET having the lowest ID among CORESET(s) of CORESETPoolIndex 1 is used in cell #1. Supported in US 63029549 (Page 105). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of determining default spatial relation and pathloss RS for CC of GO to the system of determining a default beam for a dedicated PUCCH and/or an SRS in a CC of ZHANG and LG in order to take the advantage of method for improving reliability in Multi-TRP (GO: [0129]). Regarding claim 25, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 7. Regarding claim 26, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 8. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15, 18, 33 and 36 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and in intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 15, GO, ZHANG, LG, or any prior art of record either alone or in combination fails to teach the method of claim 11, further comprising: identifying one or more of an updated uplink beam or an updated PL RS for the same TRP for multiple component carriers associated with the same TRP in an uplink component list, and identifying the multiple component carriers as associated with the same TRP based at least in part on having a same control resource set pool index or a same TCI state order in a codepoint. Regarding claim 18, GO, ZHANG, LG, or any prior art of record either alone or in combination fails to teach the method of claim 11, further comprising: identifying one or more of an updated uplink beam or an updated PL RS for the same TRP for multiple component carriers associated with the same TRP in a downlink component list, and identifying the multiple component carriers as [[are]] associated with the same TRP based at least in part on having a same control resource set pool index or a same TCI state order in a TCI codepoint. Regarding claim 33, the claim with similar limitations as in claim 15, is also interpreted same as claim 15. Regarding claim 36, the claim with similar limitations as in claim 18, is also interpreted same as claim 18. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: John Wilson et al., (US 20190229792 A1), describing QUASI CO-LOCATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR APERIODIC CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REFERENCE SIGNAL TRIGGERS Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAH M RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8951. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-5:30PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached at 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAH M RAHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 16 earlier events
Jan 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 05, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750096
MEASURING CHARACTERISTICS OF A RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739831
DYNAMIC HARQ-ACK CODEBOOK PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726908
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NETWORK DYNAMIC ON/OFF SIGNALING
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713326
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12707302
Measuring Wireless Network Quality of Service on Mobile Devices
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.4%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 491 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month