Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/997,686

POLYOL COMPOUNDS AND ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS PREPARED WITH THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2022
Priority
Jun 19, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2020097040
Examiner
LEONARD, MICHAEL L
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Arkema France
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
845 granted / 1327 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1387
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
85.1%
+45.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1327 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1 and 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent pub. No. 2010/0203344 to Simons (Cited on IDS). As to claims 1 and 3-4, Simons discloses a primary hydroxyl containing polyester polyol comprising the initial reaction between polypropylene glycol (MW=1025, corresponds to R2) and falls within the integer range for n of 5 to 500) and adipic acid (corresponds to R1) to prepare a carboxyl end capped reactant. The reactant is cooled and reacted with glycerol (See Examples, corresponds to R3 and R4). The difference between the claimed formula and that of formula I in Simons is the substituents of R5, R6, and R7. When the carboxyl end capped intermediate is reacted with glycerol R5 and R6 are hydroxy groups. However, Simons also teaches the reaction of the intermediate with trimethylolpropane or triethylolpropane as viable alternatives. Accordingly, a prima facie case of obviousness exists. The position is taken that it would have been obvious to utilize the non-preferred trimethylolpropane or triethylolpropane to cap the carboxyl functional intermediate of Simons to arrive at the presently claimed formula because the reactants are taught as suitable alternatives and would provide the final polyol with the desired primary hydroxyl functional groups that results in favorable performance of the polyol when used in a two component laminating adhesive (0005-0006). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/01/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that Simons fails to teach the claimed formula. This is not found persuasive because Simons within certain embodiments teaches the reaction of the carboxyl functional intermediate with suitable primary hydroxyl containing reactants other than the preferred glycerol (i.e. trimethylolpropane or triethylolpropane) which would result in the claimed formula specifically relating to substituents R5, R6, and R7. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL L LEONARD whose telephone number is (571)270-7450. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 7:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached at 571-272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL L LEONARD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637535
Non-Ionic Hydrophilized Polyisocyanates Having a Very Low Monomer Content
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12624154
XYLYLENEDIISOCYANATE COMPOSITION AND OPTICAL POLYMERIZABLE COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624149
POLYTHIOL COMPOSITION AND OPTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617892
APPLICATION OF THE RING-OPENING OF URETDIONES AT LOW TEMPERATURE AND AMBIENT ATMOSPHERE
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612485
CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION OF POLYURETHANE PREPOLYMERS
4y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+7.9%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1327 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month