Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/998,303

LIGHT RECEIVING DEVICE, DRIVE CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 09, 2022
Examiner
SOHN, SEUNG C
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
707 granted / 813 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
836
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§102
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 813 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 2, line 2, “the transfer transistor” is not clear and confusing which transfer transistor is referring to since there are at least two transfer transistors. Clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 10 and 20-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Tomonaga (Patent Pub. No. JP 2016184868 A). Regarding claims 1 and 20-21, Tomonaga shows in Figs. 1-5 a distance measuring device comprising: a predetermined light source (112); and a light receiving device that receives reflected light returned after irradiation light emitted from the predetermined light source is reflected by an object, wherein the light receiving device includes a pixel (200) that transfers a charge generated in a photoelectric conversion unit (301A, 302B) to a predetermined FD (303A, 303B) in a case where a voltage of a predetermined value or more is simultaneously applied to gates of at least two transfer transistors (302A - 302D) ([0019] – [0020]). Regarding claim 2, Tomonaga shows in Fig. 7 the light receiving device according to claim 1, wherein an ON period of the transfer transistor, which is a period during which a voltage of a predetermined value or more is applied to the gate, is shifted by half between the two transfer transistors ([0027] – [0032]). Regarding claim 3, Tomonaga shows in Fig. 7 the light receiving device according to claim 2, wherein an ON period of the transfer transistor is twice an irradiation time of reflected light received by the photoelectric conversion unit ([0027] –[0032]). Regarding claim 10, Tomonaga shows in Fig. 7 the light receiving device according to claim 1, wherein the light receiving device is configured such that the charge is transferred to the predetermined FD in a period in which a total value of voltages (PTXA, PTXB) applied to gates of the two transfer transistors becomes a predetermined value or more. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tomonaga (Patent Pub. No. JP 2016184868 A) in view of Sano (Patent Pub. No. US 2018/0213174 A1). Regarding claim 19, Tomonaga discloses the light receiving device according to claim 1, but does not disclose the transfer transistor includes a vertical transistor. Sano discloses the transfer transistor (Fig. 5, 32) has a vertical transistor ([0067]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide a vertical transistor of Sano on the device of Tomonaga et al. for the purpose of higher density, better performance and lower power consumption. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-9 and 11-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Hoshino (Patent Pub. No. US 2010/0315540 A1) discloses the voltage of the floating diffusion is increased owing to capacitance coupling of the transfer gate (the gate of the transfer transistor) and the floating diffusion, and the voltage of the pixel signal is increased simultaneously during a dark period. Kido et al. (Patent Pub. No. US 2019/0096933 A1) discloses a solid-state imaging device and an electronic device that can expand a dynamic range in a pixel including a high-sensitivity pixel and a low-sensitivity pixel. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEUNG C SOHN whose telephone number is (571)272-4123. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GEORGIA EPPS can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEUNG C SOHN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596180
LIGHT RECEIVING ELEMENT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596176
CONTROL METHOD OF LIDAR, AND LIDAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596079
ASSEMBLY FOR SENSORY AND VISUAL INSPECTION OF A CLOSED STORAGE TANK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597808
COMPACT OPTOELECTRONIC TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590903
INSPECTION DEVICE AND INSPECTION METHOD WITH INFRARED LIGHT FOR SCRATCH DETECTION ON INSPECTION TARGET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 813 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month