Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/998,432

SLOW RELEASE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR FORMULATION FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF THROMBOTIC OR HAEMORRHAGIC DISEASE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 10, 2022
Examiner
FAN, LYNN Y
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Op2Lysis
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
221 granted / 472 resolved
-18.2% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+48.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
522
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 472 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claim 10 has been canceled. Claims 1-9 and 11-20 are currently pending. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election with traverse of Group I, Claims 1-9 and 16-18, and of species a double mutant W235R and R275S tPA, in the reply filed on 9/11/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the claimed invention has a special technical feature different from Zhang. This is not found persuasive because as indicated by the rejections below, the groups do not share the special technical feature which contributes over the prior art at the time the invention was made. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 8, 11-15 and 19-20 have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to nonelected inventions and species, there being no allowable generic or linking claims. Claims 1-7, 9 and 16-18 are being examined in this application, insofar as they read on the elected species of a double mutant W235R and R275S tPA. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7, 16 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 7 (line 2), 16 (line 2), and 17 (line 2) recite “(w/v)”. It is unclear what the parenthetical information is conveying. Further, parenthesis is reserved for reference characters and information within parenthesis has no effect on the scope of the claims. See MPEP 608.01(m). Applicant is advised to amend claims to recite “w/v”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7, 9 and 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vivien et al (WO 2013/034710 A1; 3/14/2013.) in view of Giuliano et al (Medicines. 2019;6(7):1-20.). The instant claims recite a composition comprising a thermoreversible polymer and a nanoparticle comprising a plasminogen activator. Vivien teaches a composition comprising a protein comprises a double mutation W253R and R275S (a plasminogen activator) (p.11 line 4-5, line 15 line 22-23). Note: Sequence is listed in Search results filed on 10/6/2025, 20251006_100604_us-17-998-432-1.rag file, Result 1, see below. PNG media_image1.png 1948 816 media_image1.png Greyscale Vivien does not teach the composition comprises a thermoreversible polymer including poloxamer 188 and 407 having the claimed amount (claims 1-7 and 16-17). Giuliano teaches poloxamer 407 has been widely studied as a potential biomaterial for obtaining thermos-sensitive hydrogels thanks to its solubilizing capacity, low toxicity, drug release characteristics, and compatibility with numerous biomolecules and excipients (p.2 para 2). Solutions of poloxamer 407 at copolymer concentrations of 15-30% w/w have a low critical solution temperature similar to that of normal body temperature so they can easily be injected with a needle and syringe due to the initial low viscosity and will then promote the controlled release of an encapsulated drug by means of the gelation process (p.3 para 3). Poloxamer 407 is often used in association with other poloxamers, especially with poloxamer 188, in order to modulate the sol-gel transition temperature (p.3 para 6). Poloxamer 407-based hydrogels are attractive pharmaceutical formulations for medical application, the peculiar thermos-reversible behavior they exhibit makes poloxamer 407-based hydrogels suitable and versatile pharmaceutical formulations (p.12 para 4), and poloxamer 407-based hydrogels have been used as delivery systems for a wide range of compounds including proteins (p.4 para 3). Thus, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate poloxamer 188 and 407, since Vivien discloses a protein comprises a double mutation W253R and R275S useful for treating diseases, and Giuliano discloses that poloxamer 407-based hydrogels are suitable and versatile pharmaceutical formulations, that poloxamer 407-based hydrogels have been used as delivery systems for a wide range of compounds including proteins, and that poloxamer 407 is often used in association with poloxamer 188. In addition, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize the concentration as a matter of routine experimentation. Generally, differences in concentration will not support patentability of subject matter encompassed by the prior art unless there is evidence indicating such concentration is critical. (MPEP 2144.05 II) Moreover, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated by the cited reference and routine practice to incorporate an optimized amount of poloxamer 407 and 188 with a reasonable expectation for successfully obtaining a composition. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LYNN Y FAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3541. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached on (571)272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Lynn Y Fan/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 10, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12578336
ATP DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570924
CONTACT LENS CLEANING AGENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564202
COMPOSITION FOR ALLEVIATING, PREVENTING OR TREATING SARCOPENIA, CONTAINING WHEY PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE AS ACTIVE INGREDIENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558386
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO MODULATE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE AND GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOTA
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12550887
PERFUSION SOLUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+48.7%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 472 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month