Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 17/998,877

Thermal Monitoring in Laminate Structures

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 15, 2022
Priority
May 18, 2020 — EU 20175245.8 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, HOANG Q
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
UNIVERSITEIT HASSELT
OA Round
4 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
396 granted / 584 resolved
At TC average
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
622
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
61.7%
+21.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 584 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7, 9, 12, 15-17, and 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Application Publication to Jia 2019/0016065US in view of the US Patent Application Publication to Chen 2012/0143522US further in view of the WIPO Publication to Farrell WO2008/062392A2. In terms of Claims 1 and 22, Jia teaches A sensor device (Figure 1-3) comprising: a capillary (Figure 2: 4) configured for being embedded in a laminate structure (Figure 3: 6 and 8) between two layers (Figure 3: 6 and 8) of the laminate structure (Figure 3); a medium ([0015]) arranged within the capillary (Figure 2: within 4 a fluid; [0015]); an optical fiber (Figure 2: 11) extending through the capillary (Figure 2: 11 within 4) and surrounded by the medium [0015], wherein a portion (Figure 2: on 11) of the optical fiber (11) has temperature-dependent optical transmission characteristics (Figure 2: 3). Jia does not teach a strain sensor configured to measure strain a distance from the portion of the inside of capillary, the distance being less than or equal to a diameter of the capillary, wherein the strain sensor is an additional optical fiber with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein the strain sensor is arranged outside the capillary. Chen does teach a strain sensor (Figure 1: 106; which can measure strain [0026] and temperature [0046]) configured to measure strain at a distance from the middle of tubular object similar in shape to the capillary of Jia (Figure 1: 106 on tubular structure 102), the distance being less than or equal to a diameter of the capillary (Figure 1: 106; the sensor 106 is positioned on the outside of the tube 102 hence a portion of the sensor is equal to the diameter of the tube), wherein the strain sensor is an additional optical fiber 104 ([0026]) with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein the strain sensor is arranged outside the capillary or tubular structure (Figure 1: 106 on 102). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Jia to include an additional strain sensor on the outside of the device to get a reading of the strain that is exerted on the outer surface of the cylindrical capillary body. This provides a more accurate reading of the strain exerted on the surface compared to a sensor that is located internally of the capillary since some of the strain force by muted of absorbed capillary (See Chen’s [0026]). Jia / Chen does not teach a second fiber having a strain sensor located on the outside of a tube wherein the sensor is embedded within laminate layers is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure having 2 layers bonded together. Farrel does teach a FBG (Fiber grating) sensor (Figure 2: 3 within 4) wherein the 4 is made using laminated layers bonded together (Figure 2: 4; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). Farrell indicates the temperature sensor FBG is located in capillary tube (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30); while the strain sensor FBG is directly attached to laminated without the need of a tube (See Figure 2: one grating is located inside of a tube at element 3; while a second FBG is located in the laminate without tube at location of element 2; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). The purpose of the tube on the FBG sensor is to isolate strain from effecting the temperature reading since strain may cause fluctuations that may influence temperature reading in FBG (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG); wherein the sensor is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the device of Jia / Chen to have one FBG being inside the tube while another being outside the tube in order to isolate strain from influencing temperature readings when measuring strain or temperature acting on the laminate structure. Further Farrell teaches having multiple fibers runs allows better coverage at different locations as shown in Figure 3. As for Claim 2, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 1, wherein Jia teaches the layer 6, 7 and 8 combines can have a thickness of 3 mm or less ([0074]). Jia further teaches layer 8 can have a thickness of 1.5 mm ([0075]). One can conclude that layers 6 and 7 will have a thickness of 1.5 mm or less from the disclosed dimension above. The diameter of the tube 4 is shown to be in layer 7 as shown by Figure 1. Hence, the range 450 um or smaller is completely within disclosed range of 1.5 mm or less as indicated by Figures 1, 2 and [0075]. Further, since the claimed ranges of a diameter of the capillary being 450 um or smaller do not have any associated critically or specificity in regards with the disclosure, the examiner considers the rejection as detailed above to read onto the claimed ranges. Lastly, based on the disclosed ranges above, there must be some degree of overlaps in ranges that exist from Jia to the claimed range of 450 um or smaller. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the capillary tube size so it will fit within the layers 6/7/8 as shown in Figure 1 wherein thin applications are required to fit the sensor into tight spaces. It has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art, In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233 (C.C.P.A. 1955). As for Claim 3, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 1, wherein Jia teaches the portion (on 11) of the optical fiber 11 comprises a fiber Bragg grating (Figure 2: 2 or 3). As for Claim 4, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 3, wherein Jia teaches the optical fiber (11) comprises two fiber Bragg gratings (Figure 2: 2 and 3) having different lattice constants (2 lattice is different than 3 because 2 is designed to measure strain while 3 is designed to measure temperature). As for Claim 5, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 1, wherein Jia teaches the medium As for Claim 6, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 1, wherein Jia teaches the medium ([0015]) and the capillary (4) are optically transparent (the medium must be optical transparent in order for light to reach the grating). As for Claim 7, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 1, wherein Jia teaches the sensor device is further configured to be connectable to a measurement circuit (Figure 3: via 5) configured to measure a change in the temperature-dependent optical transmission characteristics of the optical fiber (Figure 2: 3). In terms of Claim 9, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches a sensor system (Figure 1-3), comprising: a laminate structure (Figure 3: 6 and 8) comprising two layers (Figure 3: 6 and 8); a capillary (Figure 2: 4) embedded in the laminate structure between the two layers (Figure 2: 4 and Figure 3); a medium ([0015]) arranged within the capillary ([0015]); an optical fiber (Figure 2: 11) extending through the capillary (Figure 2: 11 and 4) and surrounded by the medium ([0015] within 4), wherein a portion of the optical fiber (11) has temperature-dependent optical transmission characteristics (Figure 3: can be detected by 3); and light source ([0064]) configured to transmit light through the optical fiber ([0064: there must be a light source to transmit light through the optical fiber when it used as a light transmission tool). Jia does not teach a strain sensor configured to measure strain a distance from the portion of the inside of capillary, the distance being less than or equal to a diameter of the capillary, wherein the strain sensor is an additional optical fiber with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein the strain sensor is arranged outside the capillary. Chen does teach a strain sensor (Figure 1: 106; [0026]) configured to measure strain ([0026]) at a distance from the middle of tubular object similar in shape to the capillary of Jia (Figure 1: 106 is located on outside surface of the cylindrical body 102, the sensor 106 is configured to measure strain at the surface [0026], which is located at a distance from the internal area of the tube (Figure 1: 102/106), the distance being less than or equal to a diameter of the capillary (Figure 1: 106 the sensor is positioned on the outside of the tube 102 hence a portion of the sensor is equal to the diameter of the tube), wherein the strain sensor (106) is an additional optical fiber (Figure 1: 106 of 104) with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein the strain sensor is arranged outside the capillary (Figure 1: 102, 104, 106). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Jia to include an additional strain sensor on the outside of the device to get a reading of the strain that is exerted on the surface of the cylindrical capillary body. This provides a more accurate reading on the surface compared to a sensor that is located internally of the capillary since some of the strain or temperature maybe by muted by the absorbed capillary. Jia / Chen does not teach a second fiber having a strain sensor located on the outside of a tube wherein the sensor is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure having 2 layers bonded together. Farrel does teach a FBG (Fiber grating) sensor (Figure 2: 3 within 4) wherein the 4 is made using laminated layers bonded together (Figure 2: 4; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). Farrell indicates the temperature sensor FBG is located in capillary tube (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30); while the strain sensor FBG is directly attached to laminated without the need of a tube (See Figure 2: one grating is located inside of a tube at element 3; while a second FBG is located in the laminate without tube at location of element 2; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). The purpose of the tube on the FBG sensor is to isolate strain from effecting the temperature reading since strain may cause fluctuations that may influence temperature reading in FBG (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG); wherein the sensor is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the device of Jia / Chen to have one FBG being inside the tube while another being outside the tube in order to isolate strain from influencing temperature readings when measuring strain or temperature acting on the laminate structure. Further Farrell teaches having multiple fibers runs allows better coverage at different locations as shown in Figure 3. As for Claim 12, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 9, wherein the capillary is embedded in an encapsulant layer (Figure 3: 7) of the laminate structure (Figure 3: 6-8). In terms of Claims 15 and 16, Jia / Chen / Farrell teach a method of measuring a temperature in the laminate structure of claim 9, wherein Jia teaches using the sensor system of claim 9, the method comprising: transmitting light from the light source through the optical fiber (Figure 1: 11 [0064]); measuring light reflected or transmitted in the optical fiber ([0023]), wherein the light reflected or transmitted is indicative of the temperature of the laminate structure ([0020-0023]); measuring strain at a distance from the portion of the optical fiber (on 11), the distance being less than or equal to a diameter of the capillary (Figure 2: 2 grating has a diameter of the fiber 11, the fiber 11 is within 4 thus the diameter of 2 is less diameter of 4); and calculating the temperature of the laminate structure based on detecting changes in wavelength of the measured light (The sensor is capable of detecting strain deformation base on wavelengths [0027] and (Figure 4), the strain is then used to correlate to certain ranges of temperature base on deformations ([0011] and [0046]) and the measured strain. Jia does not teach, wherein measuring the strain comprises measuring light reflected or transmitted in the additional optical fiber, and wherein the light reflected or transmitted is indicative of the strain at the distance from the portion; wherein the strain sensor comprises an additional optical fiber with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein measuring the strain comprises measuring the light reflected or transmitted in the additional optical fiber of the strain sensor. Chen does teach wherein measuring the strain ([0026]) comprises measuring light reflected (from the grating structure ([0028]) or transmitted in the additional optical fiber (104), and wherein the light reflected or transmitted is indicative of the strain at the distance from the portion (Figure 1: at 106 and [0026]); wherein the strain sensor (106) comprises an additional optical fiber (Figure 1: 104 wrapped around the outside of the tubular structure 102) with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein measuring the strain comprises measuring the light reflected or transmitted in the additional optical fiber of the strain sensor ([0026]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Jia to include an additional strain sensor on the outside of the device to get a reading of the strain that is exerted on the surface of the cylindrical capillary body. This provides a more accurate reading on the surface compared to a sensor that is located internally of the capillary since some of the strain force or temperature may be muted by the absorbed capillary ([0032]). Jia / Chen does not teach a second fiber having a strain sensor located on the outside of a tube wherein the sensor is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure having 2 layers bonded together. Farrel does teach a FBG (Fiber grating) sensor (Figure 2: 3 within 4) wherein the 4 is made using laminated layers bonded together (Figure 2: 4; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). Farrell indicates the temperature sensor FBG is located in capillary tube (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30); while the strain sensor FBG is directly attached to laminated without the need of a tube (See Figure 2: one grating is located inside of a tube at element 3; while a second FBG is located in the laminate without tube at location of element 2; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). The purpose of the tube on the FBG sensor is to isolate strain from effecting the temperature reading since strain may cause fluctuations that may influence temperature reading in FBG (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG); wherein the sensor is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the device of Jia / Chen to have one FBG being inside the tube while another being outside the tube in order to isolate strain from influencing temperature readings when measuring strain or temperature acting on the laminate structure. Further Farrell teaches having multiple fibers runs allows better coverage at different locations as shown in Figure 3. As for Claim 17, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches the sensor device according to claim 15, wherein Jia the capillary is embedded in an encapsulant layer of the laminate structure (Figure 3: 7). In terms of Claim 21, Jia / Chen / Farrell teaches a capillary (Figure 2: 4) configured for being embedded in a laminate structure (Figure 3: 6 and 8) between two layers (Figure 3: 6 and 8) of the laminate structure (Figure 3); a medium ([0015]) arranged within the capillary (Figure 2: within 4 a fluid; [0015]); an optical fiber (Figure 2: 11) extending through the capillary (Figure 2: 11 within 4) and surrounded by the medium [0015], wherein a portion (Figure 2: on 11) of the optical fiber (11) has temperature-dependent optical transmission characteristics (Figure 2: 3). Jia does not teach a strain sensor configured to measure strain at a distance from the portion of the optical fiber, the distance being less than or equal to a diameter of the capillary, wherein the strain sensor comprises an additional optical fiber with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein the additional optical fiber is arranged outside the capillary. Chen does teach a strain sensor (Figure 1: 106; [0026]) configured to measure strain at a distance from the portion of the optical fiber ([0026]), the distance being less than or equal to a diameter of the capillary (Figure 1: 106 is on the outside, wherein the strain sensor (106) comprises an additional optical fiber (104) with strain-dependent optical transmission characteristics and wherein the additional optical fiber is arranged outside the capillary (Figure 1: 106 and 104; [0026]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Jia to include an additional strain sensor on the outside of the device to get a reading of the strain that is exerted on the surface of the cylindrical capillary body. This provides a more accurate reading of properties being measured on the surface compared to a sensor that is located internally of the capillary since some of the strain force or temperature may be muted by absorbed capillary ([0032]). Jia / Chen does not teach a second fiber having a strain sensor located on the outside of a tube wherein the sensor is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure having 2 layers bonded together. Farrel does teach a FBG (Fiber grating) sensor (Figure 2: 3 within 4) wherein the 4 is made using laminated layers bonded together (Figure 2: 4; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). Farrell indicates the temperature sensor FBG is located in capillary tube (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30); while the strain sensor FBG is directly attached to laminated without the need of a tube (See Figure 2: one grating is located inside of a tube at element 3; while a second FBG is located in the laminate without tube at location of element 2; Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30). The purpose of the tube on the FBG sensor is to isolate strain from effecting the temperature reading since strain may cause fluctuations that may influence temperature reading in FBG (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG); wherein the sensor is measuring strain occurring in the laminate structure (Page 7, lines 20-35 and Page 8, lines 1-30 wherein a tube is used to isolate strain from the temperature FBG). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the device of Jia / Chen to have one FBG being inside the tube while another being outside the tube in order to isolate strain from influencing temperature readings when measuring strain or temperature acting on the laminate structure. Further Farrell teaches having multiple fibers runs allows better coverage at different locations as shown in Figure 3. Claims 10, 11, 13, 14, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jia / Chen / Farrel as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of US Patent Application Publication to Shah 2019/0178268US. In regard to claims 10 and 11, Jia / Chen/ Farrell teaches the device of claim 9, wherein the light reflected or transmitted is indicative of the temperature of the laminate structure; wherein the strain sensor (Figure 2: 2) comprises an additional optical fiber with strain-dependent transmission characteristics. Farrell teaches as rejected in Claim 9 above wherein the FBG is located between two layers of laminate structure bonded together (Figure 2: 4). Jia / Chen do not teach the device, further comprising a measurement circuit Shah does teach a measurement circuit arranged to measure the light reflected or transmitted in the optical fiber, wherein the light reflected or transmitted is indicative of the temperature (Figure 7: 400; [0021], [0050-0051]) which can calculate the temperature and strain from FBG gratings ([0021] and [0050-0051]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Shah with Jia of using a measurement circuit to perform calculations of temperature and strain data from the gratings of Jia. This allows the system to detect temperature / strain variance and over different parameters of measurement. In regard to Claims 13-14 and 19-20 Jia / Chen teach the device of claim 9; the sensor system further comprises another strain sensor (Figure 6). Jia / Chen do not teach wherein the laminate structure further comprises a photovoltaic cell; wherein the sensor is attached to the photovoltaic cell using an optically transparent bonding material and attached to the photovoltaic cell. Shah does teach sensor structure further comprises a photovoltaic cell (Figure 6 and 7; the FBG ([0021]) is attached to the photovoltaic cell (Figure 6) using an optically transparent bonding material and attached to the photovoltaic cell (Figure 6: various transparent layers in the photovoltaic cell bonds or encapsulate the sensor to the cell). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to integrate a Fiber grating sensor capable of detecting temperature and strain to a photovoltaic cell in order to detect strain and temperature acting on the cell which may cause the cell to have performance issues via a laminate layer such transparent bonding material. The incorporation of temperature and strain sensors improves the performance and functionality of the cell. Response to Arguments Applicants’ arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 9, 15 and 21 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any of the combination of references applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The newly amended limitations have been rejected in view of the prior art to Farrell as detailed above. Newly added claim 22 have also been rejected as detailed above. This action is therefore made FINAL. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOANG Q TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5049. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 am - 5:30pm Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at 5712722397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOANG Q TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2874 /UYEN CHAU N LE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 7 earlier events
Oct 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Notice of Allowance
Jan 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 20, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761436
FIBER DISTRIBUTION HUBS
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12736762
UNDERCUT ARCHITECTURES FOR IMPROVED THERMAL EFFICIENCY IN PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (PIC) ARCHITECTURES
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736760
BIDIRECTIONAL WAFER-LEVEL LIGHT COUPLING
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730276
OPTICAL FIBER CABLE WITH WELDED ARMOR LAYER
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726740
HIGH FIBER COUNT CABLE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.7%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 584 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month