Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 17/999,076

METHODS, COMPOSITIONS, AND KITS FOR NUCLEIC ACID DETECTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 17, 2022
Priority
May 19, 2020 — provisional 63/027,234 +4 more
Examiner
WOOLWINE, SAMUEL C
Art Unit
1681
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Meso Scale Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
528 granted / 866 resolved
+1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
905
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 866 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-2, 6, 9-10, 15, 17, 21-23, 25, 29-30, 32-33, in the reply filed on 05/18/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 40, 84, 121, 155-156 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 05/18/2026. Claim Objections Claims 1-2, 6, 9-10, 15, 17, 21-23, 25, 29-30, 32-33 objected to because of the following informalities: claim 1 contains periods after the various step designations (“a”, “i”, “ii”, “b”, etc.). These periods must be removed. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 2, 6, 9-10, 15, 17, 21-23, 25, 29-30, 32-33 are objected to based on dependency from claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6, 32 and 33 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipate by Jang (KR-102052853-B1). A machine translation of the specification of KR-102052853-B1 is attached. Regarding claim 1, Jang disclosed a method for detecting a nucleic acid of interest in a sample, the method comprising: a. contacting the sample with an oligonucleotide binding reagent, wherein the oligonucleotide binding reagent comprises: i. a targeting agent complement; ii. an amplification primer; iii. a hybridization region comprising a complementary sequence to the nucleic acid of interest; and iv. an amplification blocker; Fig. 1A shows the oligonucleotide binding reagent (“Barcode-probe (BP)): PNG media_image1.png 352 378 media_image1.png Greyscale The barcode region serves as the targeting agent complement and amplification primer. The probe region serves as the hybridization region. The blocker serves as the amplification blocker. b. forming a binding complex comprising the nucleic acid of interest and the oligonucleotide binding reagent; Fig. 6 shows the barcode probe hybridized to the target. c. contacting the binding complex with a site-specific nuclease that cleaves the oligonucleotide binding reagent to remove the amplification blocker therefrom, thereby generating a first cleaved oligonucleotide comprising the targeting agent complement and the amplification primer, wherein the first cleaved oligonucleotide is not bound to the nucleic acid of interest; Fig. 6 shows Taq polymerase cleaving the barcode probe to remove the hybridization region and blocker from the barcode region. d. immobilizing the first cleaved oligonucleotide to a detection surface comprising a targeting agent, wherein the targeting agent is a binding partner of the targeting agent complement; Fig. 1B shows an encoding particle, representing a detection surface, with an attached barcode-receptor, representing the targeting agent. Fig. 7 shows the liberated barcode region hybridized to the barcode-receptor on the encoding particle. e. extending the first cleaved oligonucleotide on the detection surface to form an extended oligonucleotide; Fig. 7 shows the extension of the barcode region. and f. detecting the extended oligonucleotide, thereby detecting the nucleic acid of interest in the sample. Fig. 7 shows cleavage of the extended barcode region with a restriction enzyme, separating a quencher from a fluorophore in the barcode receptor to generate a signal. The existence of the extended barcode region (corresponding to the claimed “extended oligonucleotide”) is detected via this signal. Regarding claim 2, Jang meets at least option (a). Regarding claim 6, Jang meets the latter option, as the Taq polymerase cleaves the barcode probe at the junction between the barcode region and the probe region (i.e. hybridization region). Regarding claims 32 and 33, Jang amplifies the cleaved barcode region during PCR; see paragraph [0032] of the attached machine translation. Conclusion Claims 9, 10, 15, 17, 21-23, 25, 29 and 30 are free of the prior art but objected to as noted above and because they depend (directly or indirectly) from a rejected claim. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL C WOOLWINE whose telephone number is (571)272-1144. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GARY BENZION can be reached at 571-272-0782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL C WOOLWINE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 17, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736529
STREPTAVIDIN-COATED SOLID PHASES WITH A MEMBER OF A BINDING PAIR
5y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716095
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MEASURING MULTIPLEX RNA EXPRESSION
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704505
METHODS AND KITS FOR DETECTING TARGET SUBSTANCES
5y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680919
METHODS TO OBTAIN A BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVE OF A PASSENGER CABIN ON AN AIRCRAFT AUTOMATICALLY FROM THE COLLECTOR DEVICE
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680922
SPATIAL-DEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL FROM INTACT TISSUE SAMPLES
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+20.4%)
3y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 866 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month