Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/000,050

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING LOCATION OF VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 28, 2022
Priority
Jul 09, 2020 — CN 202010657188.2 +1 more
Examiner
HUBER, MELANIE GRACE
Art Unit
3668
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
BEIJING JINGDONG QIANSHI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
38 granted / 52 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
76
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
98.8%
+58.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 52 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims Claims 1-5, 7-10, 12-16, and 18-20 are currently pending and have been examined in this application. This action is FINAL. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, pg. 9-10, filed 09/22/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-5, 7-10, 12-16, and 18-20 under 35 USC 101 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, the amended claims are rejected under 35 USC 112(a). The amendment to independent claims 1 and 12 “control the vehicle for automatic driving according to the coordinate information of the current location point of the vehicle,” overcomes the 35 USC 101 rejection but introduces new matter into the claims and raises a 35 USC 112(a) rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-5, 7-10, 12-16, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 12 include the limitation “control the vehicle for automatic driving according to the coordinate information of the current location point of the vehicle,” and introduces new matter. While para. [0002] and [0024] of the specification directs the invention towards automatic driving of a vehicle, the specification does not disclose controlling a vehicle based on the determined coordinate information and current location of the vehicle. The newly added limitation is not supported by the specification and therefore constitutes new matter. Dependent claims 2-5, 7-10, 13-16, and 18-20 are dependent on claims 1 or 12 and are rejected for the same reasons. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure or directed to the state of the art is listed on the enclosed PTO-892. The following is a brief description for relevant prior art that was cited but not applied: Nabatchian (US 10859684 B1) discloses output of camera-LIDAR calibration can be a 6 degrees-of-freedom transformation matrix consisting of a translation and a rotation matrix that can map one space to the other one. For example, a calibration result can include a transformation matrix H, which is configured to, based on an input of a given 3D position in the LIDAR coordinate system, generate a corresponding 2D position, in a 2D image coordinate system (e.g. a XY planar coordinate system) as seen by the camera sensor. The transformation matrix H can include a rotation matrix R and a translation matrix T. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELANIE HUBER whose telephone number is (703)756-1765. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JAMES LEE can be reached at (571)-270-5965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.G.H./Examiner, Art Unit 3668 /JAMES J LEE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 16, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 31, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 22, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 16, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594856
VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING POWER SUPPLY TO EXTERNAL LOAD BASED ON SOC
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576856
Inferring Operator Characteristics from Device Motion Data
3y 6m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570158
METHOD FOR SHIFT USING SHIFT ENTRY PREDICTION AND VEHICLE THEREFOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558957
METHOD FOR OPERATING A DISPLAY UNIT OF A VEHICLE, AND DISPLAY UNIT
3y 8m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553741
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO ADDRESS LOCALIZATION ERRORS
3y 4m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+19.6%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 52 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month