Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/000,910

Organic Light Emitting Diode and Device Comprising the Same

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 06, 2022
Examiner
CLARK, GREGORY D
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Novaled GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1016 granted / 1202 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1246
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1202 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-11, 15, 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ganier (EP 3208861 A1) as evidenced by Werner (US 2013/0193414 A1). Regarding Claims 1-4, 6-11, Ganier teaches an organic light emitting diode shown in Figure 4 (below): PNG media_image1.png 668 714 media_image1.png Greyscale The organic light emitting diode (example 1) comprising a substrate (i.e. glass, see paragraph [0329]), an anode (i.e. silver, see paragraph [0329]), a cathode (paragraph [0333]), a first emission layer (paragraph [0331 ]), an electron injection layer (paragraph [0332]) and an electron transport layer stack (paragraph [0332]), wherein the electron transport layer stack is arranged between the first emission layer and the electron injection layer (paragraph [0332] and fig. 4); wherein the electron transport layer stack comprises a first electron transport layer and a second electron transport layer (paragraph [0332] and fig. 4). The first electron transport layer comprises first organic aromatic matrix compound having a dipole moment range of about ≥ 0 Debye and a ≤ 2.5 Debye [within applicants’ range] (paragraph 52). The first organic aromatic matrix compound can be represented by ETM1-1 (page 22): PNG media_image2.png 164 312 media_image2.png Greyscale ETM1-1 reads on applicant Formula 1 wherein a-c are each 1; Ar1 is anthracene substituted with a phenyl group; Ac = phenylene; X is a naphthyl group; The second electron transport layer compound comprises a phosphine oxide material with a ≥ 2.5 Debye and a ≤ 10 Debye [within applicants’ range] (paragraph 57). The second electron transport layer compound is a phosphine oxide material (paragraph 103) which can be represented as A26 (page 45): PNG media_image3.png 328 202 media_image3.png Greyscale A25 reads on applicants’ Formula II wherein m =1; k = 0; n = 1; G = triphenyl-phosphine (dipole moment 4.19, specification Table 2); Ar2 = dibenzoacridinyl The first electron transport layer and the second electron transport layer are free of an electrical dopant (see example 4 in Table 7). The organic light emitting diode further comprises a p-type layer (i.e. hole injection layer, (paragraph 0330) arranged between the anode and the first emission layer (paragraphs 0329-0331). The hole injection layer contains a compound represented by 2,2',2"-(cyclopropane-1 ,2,3-triylidene )tris(2-(p-cyanotetrafluorophenyl)acetonitrile) (paragraph 330). The structure(s) can be found in Werner who teaches 3-radialene matrix materials including p-cyanotetrafluorophenyl)acetonitrile compounds (paragraph 14) PNG media_image4.png 262 364 media_image4.png Greyscale Werner also teaches a specific example as 2,2,2''-(cyclopropane-1,2,3-triylidene)tris(2-(p-cyanotetrafluorophenyl)acetonitrile) (paragraph 25) which is the same as Ganier’s hole injection layer material (per claims 1-2, 4, 7-12). The peripheral atoms of 2,2,2''-(cyclopropane-1,2,3-triylidene)tris(2-(p-cyanotetrafluorophenyl)acetonitrile) show 50% F atoms (per claim 3). 2,2,2''-(cyclopropane-1,2,3-triylidene)tris(2-(p-cyanotetrafluorophenyl)acetonitrile) is identical to applicants’ C2 (per claim 6). Regarding Claim 15, Ganier teaches the second electron transport layer compound is a phosphine oxide material (paragraph 103) which can be represented as A26 (page 45) which is part of a mixture which include an organic aromatic matrix compound (paragraph 50). The organic aromatic matrix compound has a dipole moment of ≥ 0 Debye and a ≤ 2.5 Debye (paragraph 11) which includes derivatives such as ETM1-29 (page 30): PNG media_image5.png 230 292 media_image5.png Greyscale (8 aromatic rings)(per claim15). Regarding Claims 20-21, Ganier teaches the electron injection layer contains a metal (paragraphs 273-279) (per claim 20). The organic light-emitting diodes (OLEO) included in a display or a lighting panel (paragraph 307) (per claim 21). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record fails to show: wherein p-type layer comprises at least two radialene compounds, wherein the at least two radialene compounds are stereoisomers. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY D CLARK whose telephone number is (571)270-7087. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-4PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached on 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY D CLARK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604655
POLYMER, QUANTUM DOT COMPOSITION AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE EMPLOYING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584066
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584067
COMPOUND, MATERIAL FOR ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT, AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581793
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577202
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.2%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1202 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month