Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/001,154

ARRANGEMENT FOR CONVERTING LIGHT INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 27, 2023
Priority
Jun 10, 2020 — DE 10 2020 115 378.3 +1 more
Examiner
WON, BUMSUK
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Audi AG
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
278 granted / 450 resolved
-6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
87.0%
+47.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 450 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 6/12/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding the amended independent claims 11 and 19, the applicant traverses the rejection of at least the independent claims because Taheri does not disclose the newly added claim limitation of “at least one first light-switching element in a secondary direction oriented perpendicular to the main direction.” The examiner respectfully disagrees. Paragraph 75 of Taheri discloses the claimed feature. Paragraph 75 discloses “… a polymeric liquid crystal cell may provide waveguiding for the emitted light ….” The examiner interprets this as the luminescent dyes absorb solar radiation and emit luminescent light, the emitted light is guided—not in the original incident (main) direction, but laterally through the film or cell. Thus, the examiner maintains the rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11-14 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or (a)(2) as being anticipated by Taheri US 20150323825. Regarding claim 11, Taheri (T hereinafter) discloses an apparatus for converting light of a light source into electrical energy, in at least figures 8B, 11A and 11B, the apparatus comprising: a layered body 280 formed by a plurality of flat elements (see figure 8B of T reproduced below), wherein the plurality of flat elements are stacked on top of one another (see figure below), wherein the layered body 280 is delimited by an entry surface (examiner interprets the top portion of 280 as an entry surface as shown in the figure below), an exit surface (examiner interprets the bottom portion of 280 as exit surface) and at least one outer surface as boundary surfaces (examiner interprets side portion of 280 as boundary surfaces), wherein a main direction (top to bottom in the figure below) is defined as being oriented from the entry surface towards the exit surface, and wherein the layered body further includes: at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284, and at least one light-conducting element 281 that is located in front of the at least one first light- switching element 282A/282B/284 in the main direction; and at least one photovoltaic cell 288 arranged on at least one boundary surface (on the right-hand side of the figure shown below) of the layered body 280, wherein the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 can be set to either transmit or block light (paragraph 79), wherein in a case in which the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 is set to transmit the light, the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 is set to transmit the light (figure 11A; paragraph 83) in the main direction (top to bottom in the figure below), and wherein in a case in which the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 is set to block the light, the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 is configured to couple the light into the at least one light- conducting element 281 (figure 11B; paragraph 83), wherein the at least one light-conducting element 281 in this case is configured to transmit the light which has been coupled-in by the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 in a secondary direction oriented perpendicular to the main direction (paragraph 751) to the at least one photovoltaic cell 288 on the at least one boundary surface, and wherein the at least one photovoltaic cell 288 (also, 140 in figure 11 B) is configured to convert received light into electric energy (paragraph 83). PNG media_image1.png 406 536 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12, T further discloses the at least one light-conducting element 281 and the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 are arranged directly next to one another in the main direction (see figure above), wherein the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 contacts the at least one light-conducting element 281. Regarding claim 13, T further discloses having as at least one further element at least one second light-switching element 282A/282B/284 arranged in front of the at least one light-conducting element 281 in the main direction, wherein the at least one light-conducting element 281 is arranged in the main direction between the at least one second light-switching element 282B and the at least one first light-switching element 282A, wherein the at least one second light-switching element 282B is light-transmissive in the main direction and light-blocking counter to the main direction (paragraphs 79 and 83), wherein the at least one second light- switching element 282B is configured to transmit the light in the main direction and to couple it into the at least one light-conducting element counter to the main direction (figures 11A and 11B; paragraph 83). Regarding claim 14, T discloses at least one coupling element 282A/282B/284 for light is assigned to the at least one light-conducting element 281, wherein at least the first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 is designed as at least one first coupling element 282A/282B/284 for the at least one light-conducting element 281 and is configured to couple the light into the at least one light-conducting element 281. Regarding claim 18, T discloses the at least one photovoltaic cell 288 is arranged on at least one boundary surface of the layered body formed as an outer surface (see figure above). Regarding claim 19, T discloses a method for converting light of a light source into electrical energy, in figures 8B, 11A and 11B and paragraphs 79 and 83, the method comprising: setting at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 to either transmit or block the light (paragraphs 79 and 83), the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 forming a part of a layered body 280, the layered body being further formed by a plurality of flat elements (see figure above), wherein the plurality of flat elements are stacked on top of one another (see figure above), wherein the layered body is delimited by an entry surface (top of the apparatus in the figure above), an exit surface (bottom of the apparatus in the figure above) and at least one outer surface as boundary surfaces (side of the apparatus in the figure above), wherein a main direction is defined as being oriented from the entry surface towards the exit surface (top to bottom in the figure above; left to right on figures 11A and 11B), and wherein the layered body further includes the at least one light-conducting element 281 that is located in front of the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 in the main direction; when the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 is set to transmit the light, transmitting the light (paragraphs 79 and 83) in the main direction; when the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 is set to block the light, coupling the light by the at least one first light-switching element into the at least one light-conducting element (paragraphs 79 and 83); transmitting, by the at least one light-conducting element 281, the light which has been coupled-in by the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 in a secondary direction oriented perpendicular to the main direction (paragraph 752) to an at least one photovoltaic cell 288 on the at least one boundary surface of the layered body; and converting, by the at least one photovoltaic cell, the light into electric energy (paragraphs 79 and 83). Regarding claim 20, T discloses setting the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 to transmit the light when the light of the light source is desired to radiate through the exit surface; and setting the at least one first light-switching element 282A/282B/284 to be light-blocking when the light of the light source is to be darkened (paragraphs 79 and 83). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Taheri. Regarding claim 15, T does not specifically disclose at least one out-coupling element for light is assigned to the at least one light-conducting element, said out-coupling element being arranged at least on the at least one boundary surface between the at least one light-conducting element and the at least one photovoltaic cell and being configured for coupling the light out of the at least one light- conducting element and into the at least one photovoltaic cell. However, it is well known in the art to at least one out-coupling element for light being assigned to the at least one light-conducting element, said out-coupling element being arranged at least on the at least one boundary surface between the at least one light-conducting element and the at least one photovoltaic cell and being configured for coupling the light out of the at least one light- conducting element and into the at least one photovoltaic cell3, for the purpose of improving concentration of the light to photovoltaic cell. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to have at least one out-coupling element for light being assigned to the at least one light-conducting element, said out-coupling element being arranged at least on the at least one boundary surface between the at least one light-conducting element and the at least one photovoltaic cell and being configured for coupling the light out of the at least one light- conducting element and into the at least one photovoltaic cell for the purpose of improving concentration of the light to photovoltaic cell in the device disclosed by T, for the purpose of improving concentration of the light to photovoltaic cell. Regarding claim 17, T does not specifically disclose the apparatus is configured for a vehicle. However, it is well known in the art to disclose the apparatus being configured for a vehicle4, for the purpose of efficiently providing electric power to a vehicle. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to configure the apparatus disclosed by T for a vehicle, for the purpose of efficiently providing electric power to a vehicle. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BUMSUK WON whose telephone number is (571)272-2713. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7 AM - 5 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALLANA L BIDDER can be reached at (571) 272-5560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BUMSUK WON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2800 1 Paragraph 75 discloses “… a polymeric liquid crystal cell may provide waveguiding for the emitted light ….” Examiner interprets this as the luminescent dyes absorb solar radiation and emit luminescent light, the emitted light is guided—not in the original incident (main) direction, but laterally through the film or cell. 2 Paragraph 75 discloses “… a polymeric liquid crystal cell may provide waveguiding for the emitted light ….” Examiner interprets this as the luminescent dyes absorb solar radiation and emit luminescent light, the emitted light is guided—not in the original incident (main) direction, but laterally through the film or cell. 3 At least Martinez Anton US 20100116319 discloses an out-coupling element between light-conducting element and photovoltaic cell (figure 3; 310 between 350 and 380). 4 At least Gruhlke US 20090126792 discloses a photovoltaic apparatus configure to be used in a vehicle (figure 15).
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2023
Application Filed
May 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 12, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12615911
Electroluminescence Display
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12563898
DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557474
SILICON-BASED ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY SUBSTRATE WITH OLED CATHODE INCLUDING CONDUCTIVE SCATTERING SUBSTRUCTURE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND DISPLAY PANEL
3y 9m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557489
DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12537508
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+24.1%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 450 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month