Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/004,019

LOGIC CHANNEL MULTIPLEXING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 30, 2022
Examiner
SHIVERS, ASHLEY L
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
527 granted / 607 resolved
+28.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
625
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 607 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3,5-11, 13-16 and 33-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Sun et al (U.S. PGPub No. 20220295334 ), hereinafter referred to as Sun. Regarding claim 1, Sun discloses a logic channel multiplexing method, performed by user equipment (UE), and comprising: determining a logic channel multiplexing operation based on a logic channel multiplexing restriction related to computational power (A network device sends first information to a terminal device, and correspondingly, the terminal device receives the first information from the network device, where the first information is used to indicate an uplink maximum bit rate of each of at least one logical channel, wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computational power. If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority; See [0174] and [0203]). Regarding claim 2, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 1, further comprising: receiving uplink authorization signaling, wherein the uplink authorization signaling is used to schedule resources for multiplexing of a logic channel (A network device sends first information to a terminal device, and correspondingly, the terminal device receives the first information from the network device, where the first information is used to indicate an uplink maximum bit rate of each of at least one logical channel. The terminal device allocates an uplink resource to all or a part of logical channels in the at least one logical channel based on the uplink maximum bit rate; See [0174] and [0178]). Regarding claim 3, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 2, wherein the uplink authorization signaling carries indication information of computational power resources (the signaling includes the maximum bit rate; See [0174]). Regarding claim 5, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 3, wherein the indication information comprises: a computational power indication, used to indicate computational power resources of a network (the signaling includes the maximum bit rate; See [0174]). Regarding claim 6, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 5, wherein the computational power indication comprises at least one of the following: a computing quantity indication, used to indicate a computing quantity (wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computing quantity; See [0174]); a computing bit length indication, used to indicate a computing bit length; or a memory consumption indication, used to indicate memory consumption during computing. Regarding claim 7, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 1, wherein determining the logic channel multiplexing operation based on the logic channel multiplexing restriction related to the computational power, comprises: determining, in response to that computational power resources corresponding to uplink authorization signaling are larger than or equal to computational power resources needed by a logic channel, that a to-be-multiplexed logic channel is multiplexed to resources corresponding to the uplink authorization signaling (If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority; See [0203]); or determining, in response to that computational power resources corresponding to uplink authorization signaling are less than or equal to the computational power resources needed by a logic channel, that the to-be-multiplexed logic channel is not multiplexed to resources corresponding to the uplink authorization signaling. Regarding claim 8, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 7, wherein the computational power resources needed by the logic channel are determined: determined by the UE, configured by a network (the network device determines the maximum bit rate; See [0174] and [0176]), or determined based on a communication protocol. Regarding claim 9, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 1, wherein the logic channel multiplexing restriction related to the computational power comprises one of the following: a mandatory attribute, indicating that consideration of the logic channel multiplexing restriction related to the computational power is requisite when determining the logic channel multiplexing operation (If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority, wherein the mandatory attribute is the condition of needing to consider both the UMBR and resources; See [0203]); or an optional attribute, indicating that the consideration of the logic channel multiplexing restriction related to the computational power is not requisite when determining the logic channel multiplexing operation. Regarding claim 10, Sun discloses a logic channel multiplexing method, performed by a network side device, and comprising: transmitting uplink authorization signaling, wherein resources scheduled by the uplink authorization signaling are able to be used for logic channel multiplexing according to a logic channel multiplexing restriction related to computational power (A network device sends first information to a terminal device, and correspondingly, the terminal device receives the first information from the network device, where the first information is used to indicate an uplink maximum bit rate of each of at least one logical channel, wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computational power. If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority; See [0174] and [0203]). Regarding claim 11, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 10, wherein indication information that indicates computational power resources is provided in the uplink authorization signaling (the signaling includes the maximum bit rate; See [0174]). Regarding claim 13, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 12, wherein the indication information comprises: a computational power indication, used to indicate computational power resources of a network (the signaling includes the maximum bit rate; See [0174]). Regarding claim 14, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 13, wherein the computational power indication comprises at least one of the following: a computing quantity indication, used to indicate a computing quantity (wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computing quantity; See [0174]); a computing bit length indication, used to indicate a computing bit length; or a memory consumption indication, used to indicate memory consumption during computing. Regarding claim 15, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 10, further comprising: transmitting configuration information of a logic channel to UE, wherein the configuration information is at least used to determine the computational power resources needed by the logic channel (A network device may configure the following parameters for each logical channel by sending configuration information (for example, a LogicalChannelConfig information element) to a terminal device including a prioritized bit rate; See [0133]). Regarding claim 16, Sun further discloses the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 10, wherein the logic channel multiplexing restriction related to the computational power comprises one of the following: a mandatory attribute, indicating that consideration of the logic channel multiplexing restriction related to the computational power is requisite when determining a logic channel multiplexing operation (If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority, wherein the mandatory attribute is the condition of needing to consider both the UMBR and resources; See [0203]); or an optional attribute, indicating that the consideration of the logic channel multiplexing restriction related to the computational power is not requisite when determining a logic channel multiplexing operation. Regarding claim 33, Sun discloses a communication device (terminal device; See Fig. 5) comprising a processor (See Fig. 13, #1310), a transceiver (See Fig. 13, #1320), a memory (See Fig. 13, #1330) and an executable program stored on the memory and capable of being run by the processor, wherein the processor, when running the executable program, executes the logic channel multiplexing method provided by claim 1 (A network device sends first information to a terminal device, and correspondingly, the terminal device receives the first information from the network device, where the first information is used to indicate an uplink maximum bit rate of each of at least one logical channel, wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computational power. If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority; See [0174] and [0203]). Regarding claim 34, Sun discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium (computer-readable storage medium is provided; See [0089]), storing an executable program, wherein the executable program can implement the logic channel multiplexing method provided by claim 1 after being executed by a processor (A network device sends first information to a terminal device, and correspondingly, the terminal device receives the first information from the network device, where the first information is used to indicate an uplink maximum bit rate of each of at least one logical channel, wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computational power. If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority; See [0174] and [0203]). Regarding claim 35, Sun discloses a communication device (terminal device; See Fig. 5) comprising a processor (See Fig. 13, #1310), a transceiver (See Fig. 13, #1320), a memory (See Fig. 13, #1330) and an executable program stored on the memory and capable of being run by the processor, wherein the processor, when running the executable program, executes: determining a logic channel multiplexing operation based on a logic channel multiplexing restriction related to computational power (A network device sends first information to a terminal device, and correspondingly, the terminal device receives the first information from the network device, where the first information is used to indicate an uplink maximum bit rate of each of at least one logical channel, wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computational power. If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority; See [0174] and [0203]). Regarding claim 36, Sun discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium (computer-readable storage medium is provided; See [0089]) storing an executable program. wherein the executable program can implement the logic channel multiplexing method provided by claim 10 after being executed by a processor (A network device sends first information to a terminal device, and correspondingly, the terminal device receives the first information from the network device, where the first information is used to indicate an uplink maximum bit rate of each of at least one logical channel, wherein the maximum bit rate is interpreted as the computational power. If the to-be-transmitted data on the logical channel does not exceed the UMBR of the logical channel, and the uplink resource is sufficient, the terminal device may directly multiplex the data that is on the logical channel into the PDU, and then continue to process a logical channel with a next priority; See [0174] and [0203]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 12 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sun as applied to claim 3 and 11 above, and further in view of Chen (U.S. PGPub 2021/0194819), hereinafter referred to as Chen. Regarding claim 4, while Sun teaches having sufficient or insufficient resources (See [0203]-[0204]), fails to teach there being a flag bit with the value. Therefore, Sun fails to teach the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 3, wherein the indication information comprises: a flag bit, having one of the following values: a first value, indicating having sufficient computational power resources; or a second value, indicating not having sufficient computational power resources. Chen teaches wherein the indication information comprises: a flag bit, having one of the following values: a first value, indicating having sufficient computational power resources (a success flag indicating sufficient resources; See [0065]); or a second value, indicating not having sufficient computational power resources (failure flag indicating insufficient resources; See [0065]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method of Sun to include wherein the indication information comprises: a flag bit, having one of the following values: a first value, indicating having sufficient computational power resources; or a second value, indicating not having sufficient computational power resources taught by Chen in order to optimize resource utilization. Regarding claim 12, while Sun teaches having sufficient or insufficient resources (See [0203]-[0204]), fails to teach there being a flag bit with the value. Therefore, Sun fails to teach the logic channel multiplexing method according to claim 11, wherein the indication information comprises: a flag bit, having one of the following values: a first value, indicating having sufficient computational power resources; or a second value, indicating not having sufficient computational power resources. Chen teaches wherein the indication information comprises: a flag bit, having one of the following values: a first value, indicating having sufficient computational power resources (a success flag indicating sufficient resources; See [0065]); or a second value, indicating not having sufficient computational power resources (failure flag indicating insufficient resources; See [0065]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method of Sun to include wherein the indication information comprises: a flag bit, having one of the following values: a first value, indicating having sufficient computational power resources; or a second value, indicating not having sufficient computational power resources taught by Chen in order to optimize resource utilization. Conclusion Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHLEY L SHIVERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3523. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached at 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHLEY SHIVERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477 1/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 30, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593248
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580687
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING OR RECEIVING DATA CHANNEL AND CONTROL CHANNEL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562852
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557166
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PATH SWITCH IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557038
POWER HEADROOM REPORTING FOR UNCONFIGURED CARRIERS WITH UNCONFIGURED UPLINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 607 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month