Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/004,178

DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD, AND DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 03, 2023
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, MAHBUBUL BAR
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
245 granted / 293 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
325
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 293 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/02/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 02/02/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 2, 9, 12, 18, 19, 27, 28, 45 and 48 are amended. Claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 18-19, 27-28, 31, 33, 44-48, 55 and 62 are pending and addressed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 18-19, 27-28, 31, 33, 44-48, 55 and 62 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Independent claims 1, 18 and 27 recite limitation “wherein the configuration information comprises physical downlink control channel configuration information, the physical downlink control channel configuration information is configured to receive scheduling information for scheduling uplink or downlink data of the terminal.”, which discloses that in case of preconfigured uplink data transmission in Inactive state, any UL data including the first data from the terminal in Inactive state are sent according to the scheduling information received in the configured PDCCH (physical downlink control channel). However, Spec. para [362], [401]-[403] discloses that first UL data is sent according to the scheduling of preconfigured resources, and scheduling information in the configured PDCCH is only used for retransmission of the UL data. Dependent claims are subjected to the same rejection because of their dependency on the above rejected claims 1, 18 and 27. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 27-28, 31, 33, 44-48 and 62 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent Claim 1 recites expression “receiving, in a Radio Resource Control (RRC) Inactive state, configuration information sent by a network side;” is not understood. According to Spec. e.g., Figs. 5-7 and corresponding paragraphs in the Spec, discloses configuration information is sent by RRC Reconfiguration message or RRC Release message, which are messages known to be exchanged in RRC Connected state, not as claimed in RRC Inactive state which is a state when there is no RRC connection between the network and the terminal. Dependent claim 2 recites expression “wherein the configuration information is carried in an RRC release message or an RRC reconfiguration message” which is not understood. Claim 1, upon which claim 2 is dependent, recites configuration information is received in RRC Inactive state. However, RRC Release message or an RRC Reconfiguration message are known to be exchanged in RRC Connected state. Dependent claim 12 recites expression “performing an uplink feedback of downlink data, according to physical uplink control channel configuration information;”, however, it is not understood how the terminal, in Inactive state, received the physical uplink control channel configuration information. Independent Claim 27 recites expression “sending configuration information to a terminal in a Radio Resource Control (RRC) Inactive state” is not understood. It is not clear about how a network side device sends the configuration information in RRC Inactive state. According to Spec. e.g., Figs. 5-7 and corresponding paragraphs in the Spec, discloses configuration information is sent by RRC Reconfiguration message or RRC Release message, which are messages known to be exchanged in RRC Connected state, not as claimed in RRC Inactive state which is a state when there is no RRC connection between the network and the terminal. Dependent claims are subjected to the same rejection because of their dependency on the above rejected claims 1 and 27. Examiners Note Because of indefiniteness in the claims as explained above, prior art search based on the amendment will not be proper. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection under USC 112(a) and 112(b) does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHBUBUL BAR CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-0232. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 9AM-5PM EST; Friday variable. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khaled Kassim can be reached on 571-270-3770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAHBUBUL BAR CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Feb 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587955
Network Slicing Scalability Attributes
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581376
INFORMATION REPORTING METHOD, INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD, TERMINAL AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580696
RESOURCE UNIT COMBINATION INDICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581412
DOWNLINK FREQUENCY BANDWIDTH RESTRICTION MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574795
Enhanced Procedures for Transmission of Timing Information in Telecommunication Systems
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 293 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month