Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/004,229

DENTAL ADHESIVE COMPOSITION AND DENTAL MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 04, 2023
Examiner
SALAMON, PETER A
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
702 granted / 816 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
832
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 816 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 – 4, 8 – 11 and 15 – 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20180221251 A1 to Takayuki et al. hereinafter “Takayuki”. Takayuki is directed to polymerizable compositions for dental use (Abstract). Regarding claims 1, 4, 16 and 18, Takayuki teaches a composition at Example 3 [0131] comprising Bis-GMA (bisphenol A diglycidyl methacrylate), NPG (neopentyl glycol dimethacrylate), 3G (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) , AMA (methyl alpha allyloxymethacrylate) , filler (filler treated with 6% by mass of MPTS (methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane)) and BPO (photoinitiator). AMA is the monomer capable of cyclopolymerization [0124]. Example 3 of Takayuki is silent as to a (meth)acrylate compound having acid groups. However, Takayuki teaches that in one embodiment a (meth)acrylate compound other that the (meth)acrylate compound that is able to cyclopolymerize may be substituted with a (meth)acrylate compound having an acid group [0049]. Examples include 2-(meth)acryloyloxyethyldihydrogen phosphate [0051]. The sample is cured for physical property evaluation. Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill to add or substitute 2-(meth)acryloyloxyethyldihydrogen phosphate into Example 3 as this is directly taught by Takayuki. As to claim 2, Takayuki teaches the use of cyclopolyerizable compounds (2a) at [0029] that comprise allyoxy groups and acrylic ester compound. Takayuki also uses the terminology (meth)acrylate monomer that is capable of cyclopolymerization at [0018] to teach that both methacrylate and acrylate versions of the monomer are included. Regarding claim 3, AMA meets the structural requirements for formula (2a-1a) where R = CH3. As to claims 8 – 9, Bis-GMA meets the requirement for claim 8 and UDMA [0123] for claim 9. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to include UDMA as it is directly taught by Takayuki for use in multiple examples. Regarding claim 10, Bis-GMA is produced by the reaction of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DEGEBA) with methacrylic acid (MMA). MMA is a methacrylate compound which has a hydroxyl group. As to claims 15, Takayuki show that the filler is surface treated with 6 % by mass of MPTS [0114]. With regard to applicant’s limitations regarding the concentrations of silane coupling agent, it is the position of the Examiner that one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the invention, would through routine and normal experimentation determine the optimization of these limitations to provide the best effective variable depending on the results desired. Because, Takayuki already teaches using MPTS as a treatment agent for the filler surface, the Examiner asserts that the concentrations of silane coupling agent is an art recognized result-effective variable. Thus it would be obvious in the optimization process to adjust the concentration of the silane coupling agent to achieve the desired degree of surface treatment needed. In addition, merely modifying the process conditions such as temperature and concentration is not a patentable modification absent a showing of criticality, since the applicant does not show any unusual and/or unexpected results for the limitation stated (In re Aller, 220 Fo2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Note that the prior art provides the same effect desired by the applicant, the formation of a surface treated filler. Regarding claim 17, the compositions of Takayuki are useful for dental fillers [0002] and fill a lost portion of a tooth, adhesive agent (dental bonding material), composite resin, surface bonding agent, temporary crown, resin block for denture bases [0084]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 – 7 and 11 – 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER A. SALAMON whose telephone number is 571-270-3018. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9AM - 6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duane Smith can be reached at 571-272-1166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PAS 1/24/26 /PETER A SALAMON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600862
PROTEIN POLYURETHANE ALLOYS AND LAYERED MATERIALS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600855
BIODEGRADATION ACCELERATOR FOR BIODEGRADABLE RESIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600823
Hydrogel Preparation, Method of Forming Same and Method of Coating a Fabric
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595401
ADHESIVE SET, ADHESIVE BODY, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595626
AQUEOUS BIODEGRADABLE-RESIN DISPERSION, PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR, AND FOOD-PACKAGING PAPER OBTAINED USING AQUEOUS BIODEGRADABLE-RESIN DISPERSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 816 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month