Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/004,409

METHOD FOR PRODUCING A FERTILISER AND FERTILISER COMPOSITION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 05, 2023
Examiner
SILVA RAINBOW, HEATHER ELISE
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ccm Technologies Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
37%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 37% of cases
37%
Career Allow Rate
11 granted / 30 resolved
-28.3% vs TC avg
Strong +58% interview lift
Without
With
+58.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
81
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 30 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group 1 and Species A2, the method for producing a fertilizer composition wherein step (b)(iii) is carried out after steps (b)(i) and (b)(ii) (claims 1-10 and 12-13) in the reply filed on 11/17/2025 is acknowledged. Claims withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/. Claim Objections Claim 10 is objected to due to inappropriate spacing: “the method according to claim1which . . .” (line 1 of the claim). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Joseph (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2012/0125064 A1, hereinafter “Joseph”). Regarding claim 1, Joseph teaches a method of producing a fertilizer composition e.g., a process for making a biochar-containing composition to fertilize plants) [Joseph Para. 0072 & Claim 66], the method comprising: Providing a composition comprising ammonia (e.g., biochar treated with concentrated ammonia) [Para. 0134]; Contacting the composition provided in step (a) with (i) a composition comprising carbon dioxide (e.g., heated carbon dioxide gas may be at least partially incorporated into the mixture) [Joseph Para. 0138] (ii) a source of sulfate ion (e.g., the composition contains at least one mineral such as calcium, potassium, manganese, magnesium or their sulphates, or chloride, oxide, hydroxide, or carbonate salts and rare earth metals and sulphates) [Joseph Para. 0039], and (iii) cellulosic fibers (e.g., the biochar may contain weeds and/or green matter such as green waste or garden clippings) [Joseph Para. 0027]. Regarding claim 4, Joseph teaches the method wherein the composition comprising carbon dioxide used in step (b)(i) is a gaseous composition (e.g., heated carbon dioxide gas may be at least partially incorporated into the mixture) [Joseph Para. 0138]. Regarding claim 6, Joseph teaches the method wherein the composition comprising carbon dioxide comprises biogas (e.g., the gas may be an exhaust gas from the torrefier, or an exhaust gas from a separate process such as a combustion or pyrolysis process, and it may in particular be the exhaust gas from the production of the biochar; these are regarded as reading on biogas) [Joseph Para. 0138]. Claim(s) 1-7, 9-10, and 12-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hammond (International Patent Pub. No. 2018/127694 A1, hereinafter “Hammond”). Regarding claim 1, Hammond teaches a method of producing a fertilizer composition [Hammond Abstract], the method comprising: Providing a composition comprising ammonia (e.g., providing a first composition comprising an amino compound, and this composition also comprises ammonia) [Hammond Abstract & Page 1 lines 25-30]; Contacting the composition provided in step (a) with (i) a composition comprising carbon dioxide (e.g., the composition provided in step (a) is contacted with a composition comprising carbon dioxide) [Hammond Abstract], (ii) a source of sulfate (e.g., contacting the composition in step (a) with certain sources of gas in step (b) advantageously provides for additional nutrients in the final fertilizer composition in the form of sulfates and nitrates) [Hammond Page 3 lines 20-25], and (iii) cellulosic fibers (e.g., cellulosic fibers are added) [Hammond Abstract]. Regarding claim 2, Hamond teaches the method wherein the composition provided in step (a) comprises an anerobic digestate (e.g., the composition providing the amino compound in step (a) can be an anaerobic digestate) [Hammond Abstract & Page 2 lines 4-5]. Regarding claim 3, Hamond teaches the method wherein the composition provided in step (a) comprises an anerobic digestate (e.g., the composition providing the amino compound in step (a) can be an anaerobic digestate) [Hammond Abstract & Page 2 lines 4-5] and 30 to 40 wt. % ammonia (e.g., the composition in step (a) comprises preferably 30 to 40 wt. % ammonia) [Hammond Page 2 lines 36-37]. Regarding claim 4, Hammond teaches the method wherein the composition comprising carbon dioxide used in step (b)(i) is a gaseous composition (e.g., the composition comprising carbon dioxide may be in gaseous form) [Hammond Page 3 lines 9-12]. Regarding claim 5, Hammond teaches the method wherein the composition comprising carbon dioxide comprises the exhaust gases from the combustion of a fossil fuel (e.g., the source of carbon dioxide can be exhaust gas from the combustion of fossil fuel) [Hammond Page 3 lines 15-20]. Regarding claim 6, Hamond teaches the method wherein the composition comprising carbon dioxide comprises biogas (e.g., the source of carbon dioxide can be biogas) [Hammond Page 3 lines 25-30]. Regarding claim 7, Hammond teaches the method wherein step (b)(iii) involves adding a compost material comprising cellulosic fibers to the mixture obtained in step (a) (e.g., the cellulose composition can comprise partially decomposed organic matter such as compost) [Hammond Page 5 lines 39-40 & Page 6 lines 1-6]. Regarding claim 9, Hammond teaches the method further involving adding a source of nitrate ions (e.g., the method may further involve adding a source of nitrate ion at any stage) [Hammond Page 7 lines 10-15]. Regarding claim 10, Hammond teaches the method further involving adding a source of phosphorus (e.g., the method may further involve adding a source of phosphorus at any stage) [Hammond Page 8 lines 20-25]. Regarding claim 12, Hammond teaches the method wherein step (b)(iii) is carried out after step (b)(i) and step (b)(ii) (Hammond discloses step (c), the final step, being the addition of the cellulosic fibers to the composition obtained in step (b), which has already been contacted with the gases) [Hammond Abstract & Page 5 lines 35-36]. Regarding claim 13, Hammond teaches the method further involving a step of pelletizing the material obtained (e.g., the material obtained can be further processed and pelletized) [Hammond Page 9 lines 5-15]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hammond as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Cisneros (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2011/0283759 A1, hereinafter “Cisoneros”). Regarding claim 8, Hammond teaches the method wherein the final product can contain sulfate ions (e.g., contacting the composition in step (a) with certain sources of carbon dioxide gas in step (b) advantageously provides for additional nutrients in the final fertilizer composition in the form of sulfates and nitrates) [Hammond Page 3 lines 20-25], but does not explicitly disclose the inclusion of gypsum in the fertilizer. However, Cisneros teaches that gypsum is a standard and advantageous ingredient in pelletized fertilizers [Cisneros Abstract & Para. 0118]. Gypsum improves the physical characteristics of soil [Cisneros Para. 0005] and has advantageous solubility properties which lead to slow release of the nutrients contained therein [Cisneros Para. 0116] including calcium and sulfur [Cisneros Para. 0033 & 0034]. Further, Cisneros combines gypsum with organic waste [Cisneros Abstract], and Hammond also implements organic waste [Hammond Page 5 lines 39-40 & Page 6 lines 1-6]. As such, in performing the method of Hammond, one of ordinary skill in the art would look to Cisneros and readily appreciate the advantages of further including gypsum in order to afford a fertilizer with improved solubility and nutrient release characteristics. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention in performing the method of Hammond to include gypsum as taught by Cisneros. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HEATHER E RAINBOW whose telephone number is (571)272-0185. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7 AM - 4 PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at 571-270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /H.E.R./Examiner, Art Unit 1731 /JENNIFER A SMITH/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599069
Cocopeat Based Substrate and Its Manufacturing Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577180
Fertilizer Coating Compositions and Methods of Preparation Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565458
GRANULATED AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING MACRO- AND MICRONUTRIENTS, AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559437
AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12497343
IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO FERTILIZER COMPOSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
37%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+58.3%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 30 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month