Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 26, 2026
Application No. 18/004,637

APPARATUS AND METHOD OF TREATING SOIL

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 06, 2023
Priority
Jul 09, 2020 — FI 20205742 +1 more
Examiner
ADDIE, RAYMOND W
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Betolar OY
OA Round
3 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1287 granted / 1588 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1614
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1588 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 7-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Duffy US 2014/0270953 in view of Merritt US 5,000,789. Duffy discloses a method of soil stabilization comprising: Providing a soil treating machine (P) having: cutting edge (1) and augers (2) configured to paved and/or subgrade material (A) from a surface; a transfer device (3) configured to transfer material removed by the cutting edge; a hopper (13), configured to receive the removed material (A) from the transfer device (23). A pair of tanks/reservoirs (13a) disposed on respective sides of the hopper. See Fig. 1; [075]. A spray bar assembly (12, 14) configured to spray additives, such as binder, [0060] onto the removed material (A) as said material enters the hopper (13). Wherein the cutting edge, transfer device and spray bars can be mounted to a known paving machine, having a hopper, auger and paving screed. See [0076]. The method further including: Removing a uniform layer 100mm thick of pavement and/or subgrade from the ground. Spraying additive, such as binder onto the removed material (A) inside said hopper (13). Mixing the sprayed binder and removed material (A). Returning the sprayed material (A) back to the ground from where it was removed. Compacting said returned, sprayed material (A). What Duffy does not disclose is what binder is being used. However, Merritt teaches it is known to add alkali-activatable mixtures, such as sulfuric acid and citrus stripper oil to soil and achieve compressive strengths of 375-520psi/2.5-3.5MPA over an 11-28 day cure. See Col. 4, lns. 6-52. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the method of soil stabilization of Duffy with the step of adding an alkai-activatable mixture, as taught by Merritt in order to support vehicular traffic. With respect to claims 12, 13 Duffy teaches using industrial side-stream material, to be mixed into the soil/subgrade removed from the roadway. The “industrial side-stream material” being Recycled Asphalt Particles (RAP). And that an entirety of a roadway can thus be recycled and strengthened by said method. [0007-10]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 3/16/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 7-13 under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Merritt US ‘789. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND W ADDIE whose telephone number is (571)272-6986. The examiner can normally be reached on m-f 7:30-12:30, then 6-9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Sebesta can be reached on 571-272-0547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you need help from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND W ADDIE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671 12/10/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 16, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 09, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742300
MANHOLE LOCK SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735283
Dock Leveler With Reinforced Lip Plate
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735849
PAVER WORK MACHINE WITH A THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735904
ATTACHMENT FOR SCREEDING CONCRETE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729493
MONITOR MACHINE CONDITIONS TO IDENTIFY STICKING OR BURNING MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+8.5%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1588 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month