Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/004,713

PROSTHETIC SOCKET SYSTEM, AND PROSTHETIC SOCKET AND LINER

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 09, 2023
Priority
Jul 10, 2020 — DE 10 2020 118 258.9 +1 more
Examiner
SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
754 granted / 1004 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1036
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1004 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 2 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 2 claims the support element is arranged in the prosthetic liner which is true of the embodiment of figure 1, however, this embodiment fails to comprise an adjustment device. It is the examiner’s position that applicant is combining the embodiment of figure 1 with the embodiment of figure 3 comprising an adjustment device, however, the support element is 30 is not arranged in the liner 20. It is noted that claim 2 did not previously depend from incorporated claim 5. Claim 12, line 8, is objected to because of the following informalities: The end cap lacks antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Depending upon applicant’s amendment, claims 12-14 maybe allowable. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRUCE EDWARD SNOW whose telephone number is (571)272-4759. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 am - 5:00 pm Monday through Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached at 5712729062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRUCE E SNOW/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636144
TRUNCATED LEAFLET FOR PROSTHETIC HEART VALVES
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12605259
PROSTHETIC SYSTEM, JOINT PROTECTION DEVICE, AND COVER ELEMENT
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12605261
PROSTHETIC THUMB DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12594156
PROSTHESIS FOR THE LUNG AND THE USE THEREOF
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589011
PROSTHETIC HAND
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1004 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month