Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/004,795

SIMULTANEOUS LOCALIZATION AND MAPPING USING CAMERAS CAPTURING MULTIPLE SPECTRA OF LIGHT

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 09, 2023
Examiner
HERNANDEZ, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2661
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
4 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
28 granted / 37 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
55
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 37 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments The amendments to the claims filed on 01/22/2026 have been acknowledged accepted and entered. Preciously claims 1 – 30 and 33 – 55 were pending, claims 1, 27, 43, and 53 are amended. Now claims 1 – 30 and 33 – 55 are still currently pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to independent claims 1, 27, and 53 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 claim rejections of claims 1, 27, and 53 and their respective dependent claims, have been herein withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 30 and 33 – 55 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 27, and 53, the claims state “the second confidence value” in their respective claims. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims as it is the first time the term is used and has no previous explanation of structure associated with it. Therefore, the claims are rejected for lack of antecedent basis and for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter of the claimed invention. Claims 2 – 26, 28 – 30, 33 – 52, and 54 – 55 are rejected based on their dependency to claims, 1 and 27 respectively. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ whose telephone number is (703)756-1876. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am - 5 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John M Villecco can be reached at (571) 272-7319. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ/ Examiner, Art Unit 2661 /JOHN VILLECCO/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 12, 2025
Interview Requested
May 19, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 19, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 29, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Sep 09, 2025
Interview Requested
Sep 23, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 23, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 07, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 05, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597147
IMAGE CORRELATION PROCESSING BY ADDITION OF REAGGREGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573013
REGION-OF-INTEREST (ROI)-BASED IMAGE ENHANCEMENT USING A RESIDUAL NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573169
COMMON VIEW REGION IDENTIFICATION AND SCALE ALIGNMENT FOR FEATURE MATCHING IN IMAGE PAIRS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567268
AUTOMATED NANOSCOPY SYSTEM HAVING INTEGRATED ARTIFACT MINIMIZATION MODULES, INCLUDING EMBEDDED NANOMETER POSITION TRACKING BASED ON PHASOR ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12555389
APPARATUS, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ESTIMATING ROAD EDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.7%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 37 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month