Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/005,338

USER EQUIPMENT, SCHEDULING NODE, METHOD FOR USER EQUIPMENT, AND METHOD FOR SCHEDULING NODE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 12, 2023
Priority
Jul 16, 2020 — EU 20186255.4 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, STEVEN H D
Art Unit
2414
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
769 granted / 961 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
996
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/23/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 14-17, 23-25, 28-31, 33-36 and 38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102[a2] as being anticipated by Bhamri [US 2023/0284190]. As claims 14 and 24, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses a communication apparatus [Fig 1, Ref 102], comprising: a transceiver, which, in operation, receives downlink control information (DCI) signaling [Fig 5-10 discloses UE receives DCI signaling]; and circuitry, which, in operation, obtains, from the DCI signaling, an indication indicating: at least one of slot offsets for Physical Uplink Shared Channels (PUSCHs) or Physical Downlink Shared Channels (PDSCHs) in a data transmission [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row], the slot offsets indicated by one entry of entries in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list configured via Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row]; wherein different PUSCHs or PDSCHs are associated with different slot offsets [Par. 0110, Table2 disclose each PDSCH has a different K2 such as 1 and 4] in a first case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively [Fig 8 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are in non-consecutively] and a first time gap between a first second time gap have non-zero lengths [Fig 8, a first time gap, Ref 820, between a first PDSCH, Ref 814, of the PDSCHs, Ref 814, 826, 838, and a second PDSCH, Ref 826, of the PDSCHs is different from a second time gap, Ref 832, between the second PDSCH, Ref 826, of the PDSCHs and a third PDSCH, Ref 838, of the PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths, Ref 820 and 832, are zero lengths and placed between the PDSCH at different time so they are not the same]; in a second case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged consecutively [Fig 9 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are consecutively]. As claim 23, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses a scheduling device [Fig 1, Ref 104], comprising: circuitry, which, in operation, generates downlink control information (DCI) signaling and transceiver for trans the DCI signaling to the communication apparatus [Fig 5-10 discloses UE receives DCI signaling]; wherein the DCI signaling includes an indication indicating to a communication apparatus: at least one of slot offsets for Physical Uplink Shared Channels (PUSCHs) or Physical Downlink Shared Channels (PDSCHs) in a data transmission [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row], the slot offsets indicated by one entry of entries in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list configured via Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row]; wherein, different PUSCHs or PDSCHs are associated with different slot offsets [Par. 0110, Table2 disclose each PDSCH has a different K2 such as 1 and 4]; in a first case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively [Fig 8 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are in non-consecutively] and a first time gap between a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap between the second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a third PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths [Fig 8, a first time gap, Ref 820, between a first PDSCH, Ref 814, of the PDSCHs, Ref 814, 826, 838, and a second PDSCH, Ref 826, of the PDSCHs is different from a second time gap, Ref 832, between the second PDSCH, Ref 826, of the PDSCHs and a third PDSCH, Ref 838, of the PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths, Ref 820 and 832, are zero length and placed between the PDSCH at different time so they are not the same]; in a second case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged consecutively [Fig 9 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are consecutively]. As claims 15, 29 and 34, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the indication indicates at least one of: a number N of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein N is an integer greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses DCI indicates scheduling of a number N of transport blocks (TBs)], or a number M of repetitions of the data PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein M is equal to or greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses number of repetitions of data wherein number is equal to or greater than one]. As claims 15, 29 and 34, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the indication indicates at least one of: a number N of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein N is an integer greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses DCI indicates scheduling of a number N of transport blocks (TBs)], or a number M of repetitions of the data PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein M is equal to or greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses number of repetitions of data wherein number is equal to or greater than one]. As claims 16, 30 and 35, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the PUSCHs or PDSCHs carry different data, and/or each of M repetitions of the PUSCHs or PDSCH carries a same data [Par. 0071, 109 discloses N data mutually different data and each repetition carries same data]. As claims 17, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the indication jointly indicates the number N data [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses DCI indicates scheduling of a number N of transport blocks (TBs)] and at least one of: the number M repetitions [0071, 0109 discloses DCI includes number of repetitions for TB]; or a transmission gap between data the PUSCHs or PDSCHs [Par. 0110, table 2 discloses DCI indicates gap between the adjacent downlink TBs wherein gap is uplink TB]. As claims 25, 31 and 36, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is associated with a first slot offset [Table 2, K2 = 1], and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is associated with a second slot offset [Table 2, K2 = 4]. As claims 28, 33 and 38, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are scheduled by a single DCI [Par. 0076]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14-17, 23-25, 28-31, 33-36 and 38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu [US 20200267754] in view of Bhamri [US 2023/0284190]. As claims 14 and 23-24, Liu [US 2020/0267754] discloses a communication apparatus [Fig 3, Ref 120], comprising: a transceiver, which, in operation, receives downlink control information (DCI) signaling [Fig 3 discloses UE receives DCI signaling, Ref 315], in a first case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively and a first time gap between a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap between the second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a third PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths [Fig 4 discloses in first case, the PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively a first time gap “time interval” between PDSCH0 “read on first PDSCH” and PDSCH1 “read on second PDSCH” of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap “time interval” between PDSCH1 “read on second PDSCH” and PDSCH2 “read on PDSCH3” of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the interval between PDSCH0 and PDSCH1 and the interval between PDSCH1 and PDSCH2 have non-zero lengths, Fig 5 and Fig 7]. However, Liu [US 2020/0267754] fails to disclose what Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses a communication apparatus [Fig 1, Ref 102], comprising: a transceiver, which, in operation, receives downlink control information (DCI) signaling [Fig 5-10 discloses UE receives DCI signaling]; and circuitry, which, in operation, obtains, from the DCI signaling, an indication indicating: at least one of slot offsets for Physical Uplink Shared Channels (PUSCHs) or Physical Downlink Shared Channels (PDSCHs) in a data transmission [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row], the slot offsets indicated by one entry of entries in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list configured via Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row]; wherein different PUSCHs or PDSCHs are associated with different slot offsets [Par. 0110, Table2 disclose each PDSCH has a different K2 such as 1 and 4] in a first case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively [Fig 8 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are in non-consecutively]; in a second case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged consecutively [Fig 9 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are consecutively]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to apply a method and system as disclosed by Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] into the teaching of Liu [US 2020/0267754]. The motivation would have been to reduce overhead. As claims 15, 29 and 34, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the indication indicates at least one of: a number N of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein N is an integer greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses DCI indicates scheduling of a number N of transport blocks (TBs)], or a number M of repetitions of the data PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein M is equal to or greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses number of repetitions of data wherein number is equal to or greater than one]. As claims 16, 30 and 35, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the PUSCHs or PDSCHs carry different data, and/or each of M repetitions of the PUSCHs or PDSCH carries a same data [Par. 0071, 109 discloses N data mutually different data and each repetition carries same data]. As claims 17, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the indication jointly indicates the number N data [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses DCI indicates scheduling of a number N of transport blocks (TBs)] and at least one of: the number M repetitions [0071, 0109 discloses DCI includes number of repetitions for TB]; or a transmission gap between data the PUSCHs or PDSCHs [Par. 0110, table 2 discloses DCI indicates gap between the adjacent downlink TBs wherein gap is uplink TB]. As claims 25, 31 and 36, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is associated with a first slot offset [Table 2, K2 = 1], and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is associated with a second slot offset [Table 2, K2 = 4]. As claims 28, 33 and 38, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are scheduled by a single DCI [Par. 0076]. Claim(s) 14-17, 23-25, 28-31, 33-36 and 38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bae [US 20220131652] in view of Bhamri [US 2023/0284190]. As claims 14 and 23-24, Bae [US 20220131652] discloses a communication apparatus [Fig 10], comprising: a transceiver, which, in operation, receives downlink control information (DCI) signaling [Fig10 discloses UE receives DCI signaling such PDCCH]; in a first case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively and a first time gap between a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap between the second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a third PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths [Fig 10, discloses a first time gap “time interval comprises 4 symbols” between first PDSCH and second PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap “time interval comprises 7 symbols” between second PDSCH and third PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the interval between first PDSCH and second PDSCH and the interval between second PDSCH and third PDSCH have non-zero lengths]. However, Bae [US 20220131652] fails to fully disclose what Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses a communication apparatus [Fig 1, Ref 102], comprising: a transceiver, which, in operation, receives downlink control information (DCI) signaling [Fig 5-10 discloses UE receives DCI signaling]; and circuitry, which, in operation, obtains, from the DCI signaling, an indication indicating: at least one of slot offsets for Physical Uplink Shared Channels (PUSCHs) or Physical Downlink Shared Channels (PDSCHs) in a data transmission [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row], the slot offsets indicated by one entry of entries in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list configured via Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling [Par. 0087-0088, 0110-0111 discloses DCI includes index of TDRA that indicates slot offsets that includes in entry of TDRA table which is configured via RRC, Table 2 discloses PDSCHs includes 2 slot offsets in a row]; wherein different PUSCHs or PDSCHs are associated with different slot offsets [Par. 0110, Table2 disclose each PDSCH has a different K2 such as 1 and 4] in a first case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively [Fig 8 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are in non-consecutively]; in a second case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged consecutively [Fig 9 discloses PUSCHs or PDSCHs are consecutively]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to apply a method and system as disclosed by Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] into the teaching of Bae [US 20220131652]. The motivation would have been to reduce overhead. As claims 15, 29 and 34, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the indication indicates at least one of: a number N of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein N is an integer greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses DCI indicates scheduling of a number N of transport blocks (TBs)], or a number M of repetitions of the data PUSCHs or PDSCHs, wherein M is equal to or greater than one [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses number of repetitions of data wherein number is equal to or greater than one]. As claims 16, 30 and 35, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the PUSCHs or PDSCHs carry different data, and/or each of M repetitions of the PUSCHs or PDSCH carries a same data [Par. 0071, 109 discloses N data mutually different data and each repetition carries same data]. As claims 17, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the indication jointly indicates the number N data [Par. 0071, 0109 discloses DCI indicates scheduling of a number N of transport blocks (TBs)] and at least one of: the number M repetitions [0071, 0109 discloses DCI includes number of repetitions for TB]; or a transmission gap between data the PUSCHs or PDSCHs [Par. 0110, table 2 discloses DCI indicates gap between the adjacent downlink TBs wherein gap is uplink TB]. As claims 25, 31 and 36, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is associated with a first slot offset [Table 2, K2 = 1], and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is associated with a second slot offset [Table 2, K2 = 4]. As claims 28, 33 and 38, Bhamri [US 2023/0284190] discloses the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are scheduled by a single DCI [Par. 0076]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/23/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to pages 7-8, the applicant states that the prior arts does not disclose a first time gap between a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap between the second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a third PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths. In reply, Bhamri discloses in Fig 8, a first time gap, Ref 820, between a first PDSCH, Ref 814, of the PDSCHs, Ref 814, 826, 838, and a second PDSCH, Ref 826, of the PDSCHs is different from a second time gap, Ref 832, between the second PDSCH, Ref 826, of the PDSCHs and a third PDSCH, Ref 838, of the PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths, Ref 820 and 832, are zero length. Liu discloses a first time gap between a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap between the second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a third PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths [Fig 4 discloses in first case, the PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively a first time gap “time interval” between PDSCH0 “read on first PDSCH” and PDSCH1 “read on second PDSCH” of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap “time interval” between PDSCH1 “read on second PDSCH” and PDSCH2 “read on PDSCH3” of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the interval between PDSCH0 and PDSCH1 and the interval between PDSCH1 and PDSCH2 have non-zero lengths, Fig 5 and Fig 7]. Bae discloses in a first case the PUSCHs or PDSCHs are arranged non-consecutively and a first time gap between a first PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap between the second PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs and a third PUSCH or PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the first time gap and the second time gap have non-zero lengths [Fig 10, discloses a first time gap “time interval comprises 4 symbols” between first PDSCH and second PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs is different from a second time gap “time interval comprises 7 symbols” between second PDSCH and third PDSCH of the PUSCHs or PDSCHs wherein the interval between first PDSCH and second PDSCH and the interval between second PDSCH and third PDSCH have non-zero lengths]. So, the prior arts disclose Fig 8c and 8d of application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN HIEU D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3159. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edan Orgad can be reached at 571-272-7884. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN HIEU D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2414
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 7 earlier events
Nov 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 09, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701466
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701630
METHOD FOR OPERATING SL DRX IN CONSIDERATION OF MODE 1 OPERATION OF TRANSMISSION TERMINAL IN NR V2X
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696195
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689453
ANTENNA COMBINING FOR PHYSICAL RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL (PRACH)
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12672134
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+12.0%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month