Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/005,681

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR RECONFIGURABLE HYBRID METASURFACES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2023
Priority
Jul 31, 2020 — provisional 63/059,326 +1 more
Examiner
SUMLAR, JOURNEY F
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
410 granted / 594 resolved
+1.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
631
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
80.5%
+40.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 594 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, with respect to the rejections of claim 16 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Kim (US Patent Publication Number 2020/0227632 A1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16-19 and 26-28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US Patent Publication Number 2020/0227632 A1) in view of Ahmed (US Patent Publication Number 2020/0127169 A1). Kim teaches, as in claim 16, a system comprising (100): a phase change material (120) configured to reversibly transform between a first state and a second state ((¶0011 “under electrical control of an active layer comprising a phase transition material that transitions from a semiconducting state to a semimetallic state”) upon a triggering event (¶0011 “under electrical control ”) and interfacing a dielectric material (110 , ¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of … silicon (Si)”) on a first surface of the phase change material (120) and a plasmonic material (140, ¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of …Gold”) on an opposing second surface of the phase change material (120), a dielectric material (110)on the first surface of the phase change material (120). Kim fails to teach wherein the dielectric material is arranged in an array of nano-scatterers. In a related art, Ahmed teaches a system (¶0030 “a selective mirror (also referred to as a meta-mirror”) wherein the dielectric material is arranged in an array of nano-scatterers (¶0032 “array or grid of dielectric nanoparticles 210 forms a subwavelength dielectric grating”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill of art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the system with the phase change material, as taught by Kim, with the dielectric material is arranged in an array of nano-scatterers, as taught by Ahmed, for the purpose of providing a dielectric grating that operates as selective mirror that reflects blue light wavelengths but allows other wavelengths to pass through the grid/grating (¶0032). Kim teaches, as in claim 17, wherein the array nano-scatters have a period ranging from 100 nm to 1000 nm. In a related art, Ahmed teaches wherein the array nano-scatters have a period ranging from 100 nm to 1000 nm (¶0047 “nanoparticles… period of ˜350-700 nm”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill of art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the system with the phase change material, as taught by Kim and Ahmed, with the period of the nano-scatterers, as taught by Ahmed, for the purpose of providing a dielectric grating that operates as selective mirror that reflects blue light wavelengths but allows other wavelengths to pass through the grid/grating (¶0032). Kim teaches, as in claim 18, wherein the array nano-scatters have a radius ranging from 10 nm to 500 nm. In a related art, Ahmed teaches wherein the array nano-scatters have a radius ranging from 10 nm to 500 nm1 (¶0047 “nanoparticles (e.g., dielectrics) with diameters of ˜100-200 nm”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill of art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the system with the phase change material, as taught by Kim and Ahmed, with the radius of the nano-scatterers, as taught by Ahmed, for the purpose of providing a dielectric grating that operates as selective mirror that reflects blue light wavelengths but allows other wavelengths to pass through the grid/grating (¶0032). Kim teaches, as in claim 19, wherein the phase change material (120) is selected from the group consisting of a material comprising germanium, antimony, and tellurium (¶0013 “GeSbTes (e.g., a ternary compound of germanium, antimony, and tellurium”). Kim teaches, as in claim 26, wherein the dielectric material (110) is selected from the group consisting of silicon (¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of … silicon (Si)”). Kim teaches, as in claim 27, wherein the plasmonic material (140) is a metal selected from a group consisting of gold (¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of …Gold”). Kim teaches, as in claim 28, wherein the plasmonic material (140) is a material selected from a group consisting of indium tin oxide (0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of … indium tin oxide”). Claim 44 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US Patent Publication Number 2020/0227632 A1) in view of Ahmed (US Patent Publication Number 2020/0212022 A1; Hereinafter “Ahmed 022”). Kim teaches, as in claim 44, a system (100) comprising: an array of meta-atoms positioned over a plasmonic substrate (140, ¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of …Gold”) wherein each meta-atom (see 11A) comprises a dielectric (110, ¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of … silicon (Si)”) positioned over a phase change material (120), Kim fails to teach a dielectric nanodisk. In a related art, Ahmed 022 teaches a system comprising an array of meta-atoms (880) a dielectric nanodisk (804, ¶0064 “nanoparticles composed of high refractive-index dielectric materials, e.g., Silicon”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill of art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the system with the phase change material, as taught by Kim, with the dielectric nanodisks, as taught by Ahmed 022, for the purpose of providing a way to o avoid Ohmic losses (¶0063). Claim 59 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US Patent Publication Number 2020/0227632 A1) in view of Akselrod (US Patent Publication Number 2018/0240653 A1). Kim teaches, as in claim 59, a method for manufacturing a system comprising: providing a plasmonic substrate (140, ¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of …Gold”), depositing a phase change material (120) over the plasmonic substrate (140), depositing a dielectric material (110 , ¶0031 “the layers (110) and (140) can be made of, or include, any one or a combination of … silicon (Si)”) over the phase change material (120), Kim fails to teach exposing, through etching, at least a portion of the phase change material and plasmonic substrate, and forming, through etching, the dielectric material into an array of pillars. In a related art, Akselrod teaches a method for manufacturing a system comprising exposing, through etching, at least a portion of the phase change material 2(¶0079 “move the GST from all areas except inside the pillar cores”) and plasmonic substrate (¶0091 “to expose the titanium layer”), and forming, through etching, the dielectric material into an array of pillars (¶0091 “etching the a-Si layer with the patterned hard mask to form a nano-scale gap of a high aspect ratio between the a-Si pillars in the a-Si layer”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill of art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the method for manufacturing a system, as taught by Kim, with the etching process, as taught by Akselrod, for the purpose of providing good thermal stability and environmental stability (¶0056). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 10-15 and 29-40 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter The prior art fails to simultaneously teach all the limitations of claim 1 which includes, the phase change material is further configured to transform to one or more intermediate states the first state and the second state wherein each of the one or more intermediate states comprises a refractive index different than the first and second refractive indices. Regarding claims 10-15 and 29-40 have dependency upon independent claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOURNEY F SUMLAR whose telephone number is (571)270-0656. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOURNEY F. SUMLAR Examiner Art Unit 2872 28 February 2026 /RICKY L MACK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2872 1 Therefore, the radius would be 50nm-100nm. 2 The phase change material is exposed in the areas of the pillar cores
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12625313
POLYESTER COPOLYMERS FOR USE IN OPTICAL FILMS
4y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619094
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INCREASING DISPLAY SYSTEM FILL FACTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619097
EYEWEAR
2y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12607885
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12607886
SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MODULATING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+10.4%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 594 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month