Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/006,101

Electrode Having Excellent Weldability Between Electrode Lead and Electrode Tab and Method of Manufacturing the Same

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 19, 2023
Examiner
YANCHUK, STEPHEN J
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 11m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
251 granted / 499 resolved
-14.7% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
515
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 499 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/10/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant argument to the definition of sides in relationship to “free side” being a distinguishing side is persuasive. Previously applied 112 rejection is overcome in view of arguments and amendment. Applicant's arguments filed 10/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argument pertaining to electrode tab having an insulating layer on one side and a weld on the other is not persuasive. The outermost electrode tab is in direct contact with the insulating layer. A weld penetrates metal layers and therefore it is interpreted the other layer of the outermost electrode tab would comprise a weld that brings the electrode tab and electrode lead to each other. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 10-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sekisui (WO 2020/067511) and further in view of Moon (PGPUB 2011/0039131) Claim 10: Sekisui teaches a battery with a short-circuiting prevention layer provided on the surface of a first electrode [Abstract]. The membrane electrode assembly comprises a positive electrode plate (10X) and a negative electrode plate (20Y) whereby a composition slurry forms the active material of the electrodes and is applied to a current collector [Membrane electrode assembly preparation step]; this teaches applicant’s electrode current collector coated with an electrode active material. The connection areas (a1, a2) of the membrane electrode assembly (5) [Membrane electrode assembly preparation step] are interpreted to read on applicant’s electrode tab as they have a free end having a side surface opposite the side surface of the electrode current collector and a pair of first side surfaces extending along corresponding side surfaces of the electrode current collector [Fig 2, 6, 8]. Applicant’s electrode lead are taught by the prior art tabs (16, 26) [Membrane electrode assembly preparation step]. The outermost electrode tab is in direct contact with the insulating layer. A weld penetrates metal layers and therefore it is interpreted the other layer of the outermost electrode tab would comprise a weld that brings the electrode tab and electrode lead to each other. The weld is taught by Sekisui to be “resistance welding, ultrasonic welding, fusion, and the like.” This type of assembly is interpreted to read on the instant claim metrics of a layer on the first side of the pair of first side surfaces and a weld on a second side surface. Additionally, the instant claim does not recite “directly” to identify the connection method and therefore claims can be met by a connection from a first side surface and additional features till the connection of the insulating film is met. Sekisui teaches a final product having a short-circuiting prevention layer (50, 51) exemplified to be an organic material of polyimide [Short-circuit prevention layer], interpreted to read on applicant’s insulating layer. Sekisui also teaches a weld step in order to form the connection between the tab and the connection areas [Membrane electrode assembly preparation step]. It appears the order of operation taught by Sekisui is exemplified to be first a weld step [Fig 8A] and then a coating step of the insulating material [Fig. 8B]. It would be obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to change the order of the prior art process steps – MPEP 2144.04 IV C. In addition, Moon teaches a secondary battery with electrical connection between electrode tabs [abstract]. The electrode tabs (110, 210) are taught to be conductively connected to electrode connection tabs (331, 332) through a weld [Fig 5A; 0071-0077]. Moon teaches applying an insulative cover layer (330) in order to enable the weld [0075-0077], which is exemplified to be polyimide [0075]. One having ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing would have found it obvious to change the sequencing of steps of Sekisui to have a coating step first and then a weld under case law and additionally because the materials of the coating are the same of Moon which is specific use in a spot weld technique. The instant claim does not lay weight to a specific type of welding, but Moon provides motivation and support for a spot weld method to connect electrical tabs and connectors of battery cells [0006-0007]. Claim 11-12: Sekisui teaches the insulating film to be formed by coating on an entirety of the sides [Fig 2, 6, 7]. The material is applied in a liquid form and will coat the sides [Short-circuiting prevention layer forming step]. Claim 13: Sekisui teaches a feature of two elements welded wherein the limitation of the end of the electrode lead proximal to the electrode tab is welded to the electrode tab [Fig 7; Membrane electrode assembly preparation step]. Claim 14: Sekisui teaches a weld location that meets the limitation of applicant’s location of the end of the electrode lead proximal to the electrode tab and the free end of the electrode tab [Fig 7; Membrane electrode assembly preparation step]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN J YANCHUK whose telephone number is (571)270-7343. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 10a-8p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nick Smith can be reached at 571-272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHEN J YANCHUK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 26, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 26, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 14, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 07, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603273
Method of Preparing Positive Electrode Active Material
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597611
CATHODE FOR AN ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL INCLUDING AT LEAST ONE CATHODE ADDITIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592459
ADAPTER COMPONENT, BATTERY CELL, BATTERY, ELECTRICAL DEVICE, AND METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING BATTERY CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592458
BATTERY CELL, BATTERY, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580198
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+40.0%)
4y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 499 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month