Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/006,325

INDICATION OF SLOT OFFSET FOR A SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL VIA TRIGGER VALUE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 20, 2023
Examiner
ABELSON, RONALD B
Art Unit
2476
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
4 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1179 granted / 1307 resolved
+32.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1338
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1307 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . D1 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED: "Enhancements on SRS flexibility, switching, coverage and capacity", 3GPP DRAFT; R1-2006795, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (8GPP), MOBILE COMPETENCE CENTRE ; 650, ROUTE DES LUCIOLES ; F-06921 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS CEDEX ; FRANCE vol. RAN WG1, no. e-Meeting; 20200817 - 20200828 8 August 2020 (2020-08-08), XP051918245, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://ftp.3gpp.org/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_102-e/Docs/ R1-2006795.zip R1-2006795 Enhancements on SRS flexibility, coverage and capacity.docx [retrieved on 2020-08-08] Form PCT/ISA/237 (Separate Sheet) (Sheet 1) (EPO-April 2005) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 16, 18, 20, and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Faxer US 20210409178 in view of Go US 20210367727. Regarding claims 1, 16, and 21, Faxer teaches a method of operating a user equipment (UE), comprising: receiving a configuration for a sounding reference signal (SRS) resource set that comprises a mapping between a set of downlink control information (DCI) codepoints to a set of slot offsets of a slot offset list (each codepoint of the SRS request field triggers one or more SRS resource set and each SRS resource set is associated with a nominal slot offset, which may be configured using an RRC field, [0169]); receiving a downlink control information DCI communication that is configured to trigger transmission of an aperiodic (AP) SRS sounding reference signal (SRS)([0087]); determining a slot offset from the DCI communication to an SRS resource set for the AP SRS based at least in part on a DCI codepoint of the DCI communication in accordance with the mapping ([0169]); and transmitting the AP SRS on the SRS resource set in accordance with the determined slot offset ([0169]), wherein the mapping is a 1:1 mapping between the set of DCI codepoints and set of slot offsets (each codepoint of the SRS request field triggers one or more SRS resource set and each SRS resource set is associated with a nominal slot offset, which may be configured using an RRC field, [0169]), or wherein the mapping, for at least one DCI codepoint, is a 1:N mapping that maps the DCI codepoint to a set of candidate slot offsets (each codepoint of the SRS request field triggers one or more SRS resource set and each SRS resource set is associated with a nominal slot offset, which may be configured using an RRC field, [0169]), or wherein the set of slot offsets numbers less than the set of DCI codepoints. Faxar is silent on wherein the value configured to trigger transmission of the AP SRS is separate from the DCI codepoint used to determine the slot offset. Go teaches wherein the value configured to trigger transmission of the AP SRS is separate from the DCI codepoint used to determine the slot offset ([0213, 0214]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the system of Faxar by wherein the value configured to trigger transmission of the AP SRS is separate from the DCI codepoint used to determine the slot offset, as shown by Go. This modification would benefit the system by providing a proven, reliable method for triggering transmission of the AP SRS. Regarding claims 3, 18, the configuration is received via radio resource control (RRC) signaling (Faxar: RRC, [0169]). Regarding claims 5, 20, receiving a command to modify the configuration (Faxar: RRC, [0169]). Regarding claim 9, the 1:1 mapping between the set of DCI codepoints and set of slot offsets (Faxar: [0169]). Regarding claim 10, the mapping, for the at least one DCI codepoint, is the 1:N mapping that maps the DCI codepoint to the set of candidate slot offsets (Faxar: [0169]). Claim(s) 4, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Faxer and Go as applied to claims 1, 16 above, and further in view of Cheng US 20190222361. Although Faxer teaches a slot offset list, the combination is silent on wherein the slot offset list supplements a slot offset field of the configuration associated with a default slot offset, or wherein the slot offset list incorporates the slot offset field associated with the default slot offset. Cheng teaches a default slot offset ([0069]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the system of the combination by wherein the slot offset list supplements a slot offset field of the configuration associated with a default slot offset, or wherein the slot offset list incorporates the slot offset field associated with the default slot offset, as suggested by Cheng. This modification would benefit the system by the UE may use a default slot offset when there is no slot offset received by the UE (Cheng ([0069]). Claim(s) 6, 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination Faxer and Go as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of D1. Regarding claim 6, the combination is silent on the command commands the UE to add or remove one or more entries to or from the slot offset list, or wherein the command commands the UE to add or remove at least one entry to or from the set of DCI codepoints, or wherein the command commands the UE to modify a mapping between the set of DCI codepoints and the slot offset list, or a combination thereof. D1 teaches the command commands the UE to add or remove one or more entries to or from the slot offset list (same MAC CE command can update number of active SRS resources associated SRS resource set, section 2.1.1), or wherein the command commands the UE to add or remove at least one entry to or from the set of DCI codepoints, or wherein the command commands the UE to modify a mapping between the set of DCI codepoints and the slot offset list, or a combination thereof. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the system of the combination by the command commands the UE to add or remove one or more entries to or from the slot offset list, as shown by D1. This modification would benefit the system by providing a proven, reliable method for updating the mapping between the set of DCI codepoints and the slot offset list. Regarding claim 8, the command corresponds to a medium access control command element (MAC-CE) (D1: section 2.1.1). Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination Faxer and Go as applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Wang US 20230079128. Regarding claim 11, the combination is silent on determining an availability of one or more candidate slot offsets among the set of candidate slot offsets, wherein the transmitting is performed on an earliest available slot based on the determination. Wang teaches determining an availability of one or more candidate slot offsets among the set of candidate slot offsets, wherein the transmitting is performed on an earliest available slot based on the determination ([0004], [0108]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the system of the combination by determining an availability of one or more candidate slot offsets among the set of candidate slot offsets, wherein the transmitting is performed on an earliest available slot based on the determination, as shown by Wang. This modification would benefit the system by minimizing transmission delay. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7, 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/30/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As shown above, Go does teach the limitations that the Applicant contends Go does not teach. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONALD B ABELSON whose telephone number is (571)272-3165. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RONALD B ABELSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 20, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 08, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 14, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604303
SIGNAL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598623
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598499
INTERFERENCE MEASUREMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, TERMINAL, AND NETWORK SIDE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598532
Session Management Function Entity Selection Method, Apparatus, and System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587309
BLIND DECODING LIMIT TECHNIQUES FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (-1.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1307 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month