Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/006,356

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DEFORMING THE CONDUCTORS OF AT LEAST ONE WINDING ASSEMBLY, PROTRUDING FROM A SIDE OF A STATOR OR ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 20, 2023
Examiner
TUGBANG, ANTHONY D
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tecnomatic Spa
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
816 granted / 1058 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1098
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1058 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicants election with traverse of the invention of Group I, Claims 1 through 13, in the reply filed on February 6, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the process contains certain limitations that are present in the apparatus and thus, both groups of inventions should be examined together. This is not found persuasive because while it may be true that certain limitations are shared between the process (Claim 14) and the apparatus (Claim 1), as noted in the previous office action, it is these shared limitations that are the basis for the lack of unity requirement. To reiterate, the technical features that are shared between the apparatus and process are disclosed by JP’011, which means that these technical features are not special as they do not make a contribution over JP’011. Pursuant to PCT Rule 13.2, the Lack of Unity requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 14 through 21 have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on February 6, 2026. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: --Apparatus for Deforming the Conductors of at Least One Winding Assembly--. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: On page 4 of the specification, “US7,480,987” (line 18) should be changed to –US 7,480,987--. On pages 13-14 of the specification, or ¶ [0047], each occurrence of “figure” should be changed to –Figure--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 through 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In Claim 1, it is unclear what is meant by the phrase of “in particular” (line 9). The phrase appears to be equivalent to “such as”, where the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). In Claim 2, it is unclear of the latter recitation of “an inner radial backing surface” (line 2) is referring to an earlier recitation of “an inner radial backing surface” (line 11 of Claim 1). How many inner radial backing surfaces are there? For purposes of examination, both recitations will be treated as the very same inner radial backing surface. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 through 11, as best understood, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Publication 2018/0375409 to Yoshida et al (hereinafter “Yoshida”). Claim 1: Yoshida discloses an apparatus for deforming conductors of at least one winding assembly (e.g. 10, Fig. 1), protruding from a side of a stator (e.g. 20, Fig. 11) of an electric machine; the at least one winding assembly comprising a plurality of conductors (e.g. 12, 14) comprising at least one leg inserted into cavities (slots) of the stator having at least one respective free end (e.g. at 12, 14, Fig. 11, ¶ [0102]); the apparatus comprising at least one twisting matrix (e.g. 100, Fig. 11) adapted to rotate about an axis (X)(e.g. centerline of 116a, Fig. 11), comprising at least one pocket (e.g. 104a) suitable for insertion of the at least one free end (e.g. Fig. 13); wherein the apparatus further comprises a radial backing member (e.g. 102a) provided close to the at least one twisting matrix and close to the at least one pocket, on an insertion side of the at least one free end (e.g. Fig. 11); the radial backing member comprising an inner radial backing surface [see annotated partial view of Yoshida’s Figure 11 below] for a portion of the at least one leg protruding from the side of the stator. PNG media_image1.png 437 454 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 2: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the radial backing member comprises the inner radial backing surface for the portion of the at least one leg protruding from the side of the stator between the stator (20, Fig. 11) and the at least one pocket (e.g. upper end of 104a, Fig. 11). Claim 3: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the inner radial backing surface is arranged between the axis (X)(of 116a) of the at least one twisting matrix and the portion of the at least one leg (at 10, Fig. 11) on which it acts. Claim 4: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the radial backing member is adapted to rotate about the axis (X) synchronously (simultaneously) with respect to the at least one twisting matrix (e.g. see all arrows in Fig. 14). Claim 5: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the radial backing member is adapted to translate along the axis (X)(e.g. Fig. 14). Claim 6: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the inner radial backing surface has a substantially cylindrical extension (e.g. as part of 102a, ¶ [0092]). Claim 7: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the inner radial backing surface has a substantially conical extension (e.g. convex portion 112 as part of 102a, Fig. 14, ¶ [0093]). Claim 8: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the radial backing member comprises a body (e.g. 102a) and a plurality of teeth (e.g. material projecting downward around 104a, 104b, 104c, 104d, or 110a, 110b, 110c, 110d, Fig. 11) protruding from the body, the inner radial backing surface (bottom surface) being provided on the plurality of teeth. Claim 9: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the radial backing member comprises at least one tooth (e.g. material projecting downward around anyone of 104a, 104b, 104c or 104d) movable in a radial direction with respect to the axis (X) via moving means (e.g. 116a, 116b, 116c, 116d), the at least one tooth being movable between a retracted position (e.g. in Fig. 14) that defines a minimum radial dimension, and an extracted position (e.g. in Fig. 15) that defines a maximum radial dimension, the inner radial backing surface being provided on the at least one tooth (e.g. ¶¶ [0110], [0111]). Claim 10: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 9, wherein the radial backing member comprises a plurality of teeth (e.g. material projecting downward around 104c, 104d, Fig. 11) movable in the radial direction, the teeth having circumferential ends that overlap corresponding circumferential ends of adjacent teeth (e.g. material projecting downward around 104a, 104b, Figs. 14 to 15) according to a direction parallel to the axis (X). Claim 11: Yoshida discloses the apparatus of claim 9, wherein the moving means comprises: a first plate (e.g. 120a, Fig. 11) laying [horizontally] perpendicular to the [vertical] axis (X), provided with at least one radial seat (e.g. 118a) for the at least one tooth (e.g. at 104a) movable in the radial direction, adapted to constrain, at least partially, axial and circumferential movements with respect to the first plate; and a second plate (e.g. 120b) lying [horizontally] perpendicular to the [vertical] axis (X) (e.g. Figs. 11, 14), which, by moving relative to the first plate, causes a radial movement of the at least one tooth (e.g. Figs. 13 to 17, ¶¶ [0094] to [0098]). Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding Claim 12, the prior art does not teach: a second plate lying perpendicular to the axis (X), which, by moving relative to the first plate, causes the radial movement of the at least one tooth; a horizontal slot for each tooth, provided on the second plate; and at least one pin, having an extension substantially parallel to the axis (X), provided at one end of each tooth, which in use faces the second plate, the at least one pin being slidable and suitable for being guided by a respective horizontal slot. Regarding Claim 13, the prior art does not teach: a vertical slot extending in a plane passing through the axis (X) provided on the support portion of each tooth, inclined with respect to the axis (X); and at least one horizontal pin extending substantially perpendicular to the axis (X) and provided inside the corresponding radial groove crossing it perpendicularly to the radial direction, and adapted to slide inside the vertical slot. Furthermore, it would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the apparatus of Yoshida by including any of the above features, because to do so would destroy the overall structure of Yoshida. Accordingly, Claims 12 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Japanese Patent Publication, JP 2017-085775 discloses an apparatus for deforming conductors of a winding assembly (e.g. 4, Fig. 5), where the apparatus includes a twisting matrix (e.g. Fig. 6). Non-Patent Literature IEEE Publication to Glaessel et al, entitled "Manufacturing Influences on the Motor Performance of Traction Drives with Hairpin Winding", discloses an apparatus (e.g. Fig. 2) for deforming conductors of a winding assembly (e.g. Fig. 1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to A. DEXTER TUGBANG whose telephone number is (571)272-4570. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JESSICA HAN can be reached at (571) 272-2078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A. DEXTER TUGBANG/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 20, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597663
Method for Producing a High-Voltage Battery Unit and a High-Voltage Battery Unit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597593
Manufacturing Method for Traceability of Battery Electrodes with Fiducial Markers
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597834
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING STATOR FOR ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598707
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING MULTI-LAYER CIRCUIT BOARD INCLUDING EXTREME FINE VIA AND MULTI-LAYER CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597558
SPIRAL CORE CURRENT TRANSFORMER FOR ENERGY HARVESTING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.6%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1058 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month